AMD Ryzen 5 YD160XBCAEWOF 1600X 6 Core AM4 CPU
AMD Ryzen Master provides for up to four profiles to store custom clocks and voltage adjustments for both the Ryzen CPU and DDR4 memory. You can park cores and adjust memory timings, too. Accurate hardware status updates are vital, so AMD Ryzen Master has you covered with both real-time monitoring and a histogram of per-core clock rates and temperature, including average and peak readings. AMD introduces SenseMI technology, a set of learning and adapting features that help the AMD Ryzen processor customize its performance to you and your applications. Finally: performance that thinks. Cool and quiet processor operation using a sophisticated grid of smart sensors. Fine-tuned processor performance adjusted in real time to meet the performance demands of your game or app. Automatic extra performance boost for enthusiasts with premium systems and processor cooling. Built-in artificial intelligence that primes your processor to tackle your app workload more efficiently. Learning algorithms that predict and pre-load needed data for fast and responsive computing.
AMD Ryzen Master provides for up to four profiles to store custom clocks and voltage adjustments for both the Ryzen CPU and DDR4 memory. You can park cores and adjust memory timings, too. Accurate hardware status updates are vital, so AMD Ryzen Master has you covered with both real-time monitoring and a histogram of per-core clock rates and temperature, including average and peak readings. AMD introduces SenseMI technology, a set of learning and adapting features that help the AMD Ryzen processor customize its performance to you and your applications. Finally: performance that thinks. Cool and quiet processor operation using a sophisticated grid of smart sensors. Fine-tuned processor performance adjusted in real time to meet the performance demands of your game or app. Automatic extra performance boost for enthusiasts with premium systems and processor cooling. Built-in artificial intelligence that primes your processor to tackle your app workload more efficiently. Learning algorithms that predict and pre-load needed data for fast and responsive computing.
AMD Ryzen Master provides for up to four profiles to store custom clocks and voltage adjustments for both the Ryzen CPU and DDR4 memory. You can park cores and adjust memory timings, too. Accurate hardware status updates are vital, so AMD Ryzen Master has you covered with both real-time monitoring and a histogram of per-core clock rates and temperature, including average and peak readings. AMD introduces SenseMI technology, a set of learning and adapting features that help the AMD Ryzen processor customize its performance to you and your applications. Finally: performance that thinks. Cool and quiet processor operation using a sophisticated grid of smart sensors. Fine-tuned processor performance adjusted in real time to meet the performance demands of your game or app. Automatic extra performance boost for enthusiasts with premium systems and processor cooling. Built-in artificial intelligence that primes your processor to tackle your app workload more efficiently. Learning algorithms that predict and pre-load needed data for fast and responsive computing.
AMD Ryzen Master provides for up to four profiles to store custom clocks and voltage adjustments for both the Ryzen CPU and DDR4 memory. You can park cores and adjust memory timings, too. Accurate hardware status updates are vital, so AMD Ryzen Master has you covered with both real-time monitoring and a histogram of per-core clock rates and temperature, including average and peak readings. AMD introduces SenseMI technology, a set of learning and adapting features that help the AMD Ryzen processor customize its performance to you and your applications. Finally: performance that thinks. Cool and quiet processor operation using a sophisticated grid of smart sensors. Fine-tuned processor performance adjusted in real time to meet the performance demands of your game or app. Automatic extra performance boost for enthusiasts with premium systems and processor cooling. Built-in artificial intelligence that primes your processor to tackle your app workload more efficiently. Learning algorithms that predict and pre-load needed data for fast and responsive computing.
in 10 offers
The lowest price for AMD Ryzen 5 YD160XBCAEWOF 1600X 6 Core AM4 CPU right now is $48.26 at AliExpress.com - AliExpress-226247430, compared across 6 retailers.
The all-time low was $45.00 on 13 Feb 2026 — today's price is 7% above the lowest ever. That's a little above the best price we've seen.
Prices last updated 10 June 2026.
Last updated at 10/06/2026 10:28:04
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor (YD160XBCAEWOF)
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Ryzen 5 1600X R5 1600X 3.6 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 95W L3=16M YD160XBCM6IAE Socket
Free delivery
Amd Ryzen5 1600x R5-1600x 3.6ghz 6core12thr 95w Socket Am4 Cpu
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
AMD Ryzen5 1600X R5-1600X 3.6GHz 6Core12Thr 95W Socket AM4 CPU Processors Tested
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.60 GHz Hexa-Core (YD160XBCM6IAE) Processor
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 3.6GHz Quad-Core (YD160XBCAEWOF) Processor
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Amd Ryzen 5 1600x Processor 6-core Socket Am4 Cpu Used
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor
7-day returns
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor
60-day returns
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor (YD160XBCAEWOF)
Delivery between 14–18 June $15.52
originally posted on neweggbusiness.com
So, you may have noticed that I wrote the same thing in the Pros and Cons. Not a mistake. I was running an AMD 6300 in an Abit Mobo with SLI GTX 660's. The chip wasn't really up to the task and between the Mobo, the 6300, and the issues running SLI I had a rig that ran great one minute and crashed out the next. T-shooting the system revealed nothing so I can't blame any one component. It was a group effort that created a crazy hot girlfriend of a machine. She'd make you scream with pleasure one moment and anger the next. I was waiting for an excuse to change things up and the Ryzen chips provided that something. When building your own machine and looking for the "best" you have to look at performance per dollar even if you have unlimited funds because the "best" can ... MoreSo, you may have noticed that I wrote the same thing in the Pros and Cons. Not a mistake. I was running an AMD 6300 in an Abit Mobo with SLI GTX 660's. The chip wasn't really up to the task and between the Mobo, the 6300, and the issues running SLI I had a rig that ran great one minute and crashed out the next. T-shooting the system revealed nothing so I can't blame any one component. It was a group effort that created a crazy hot girlfriend of a machine. She'd make you scream with pleasure one moment and anger the next. I was waiting for an excuse to change things up and the Ryzen chips provided that something. When building your own machine and looking for the "best" you have to look at performance per dollar even if you have unlimited funds because the "best" can be subjective. On paper my SLI'd cards were supposed to be as good as comparable top end cards. Maybe they were, but I am guessing that the top end cards didn't crash as much as my dual power suckers. I'd failed to really appreciate the relationship of performance and compatibility. Dumb, because compatibility results in stability. Compatibility = Performance = Stability = Speed So, when I started looking for a new cpu to replace my aging 6300 I immediately looked at the "other" guys. Everyone, all the commercials and advertising that is, says that Intel is the way to go. If advertisements say they are the best then it must be true, right? To be honest, there is much more support out there for them. Also to be honest, I didn't feel like I lost much power due to my chipset compared to other chips of the day. My problem was compatibility. It wasn't AMD's fault that I put together an unstable rig. So, I did a side by side multi-week research session before upgrading my system. I compared the very best to the middle of the road. I looked at overclocking, gaming, stability, support, data processing, etc. My goal was to get a chip that would last through a couple of upgrades (maybe 3-5 years) and still perform well for the average user who games. AMD Ryzen chips exceeded all of my expectations for much less than Intel. Haters and fan boys have at it. Walk around your house "makin' it rain" with all the money you paid for a blue and silver sticker to place on your tower. Me? I bought stability and performance. Yeah, performance. AMD Ryzen, kids. This chip is BA. I only wish I would have went with the R7 1800X. I went with just less than the best because I bought into the Intel hype. Mistake...if you can afford it and it makes sense at all then run the R7. You won't regret it. Ultimately, I am more than impressed with this chip. The 6300 was good in its time. The 1600x? WOW. I'm really glad that I took the time to do the research. Here is my set-up: ATX case, Ryzen 5 1600X, AM4+ ASRock X370 Killer SLI MOBO, Team Dark Pro 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3000, Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB, and an MSI Core Frozr L cooler I plan on upgrading to 32GB of ram in the near future but this thing is STABLE AND FAST. It is more chip than I use. When/if I feel the chipset is the issue I will go with another AMD. They stepped up their game. I'm impressed.
originally posted on neweggbusiness.com
This processor and the R3 1200 exist as an inexpensive means to get into a AM4 platform where overall processor performance isn't the priority. Not really meant to go head to head against intel's lower end processors, the next gen Raven Ridge APU is meant for that task. A lot of people will point out that you have to buy a separate graphic card, but if your actually gaming on this processor your going to want an actual graphic card as the built-in gpu's that you may find on certain processors have pretty poor performance. I have extra video cards laying around so I didn't care about a built-in gpu. I built a file server with this processor. I could of used the 1200 instead, but I like leaving myself some headroom for the future and spending an extra twenty dollars ... MoreThis processor and the R3 1200 exist as an inexpensive means to get into a AM4 platform where overall processor performance isn't the priority. Not really meant to go head to head against intel's lower end processors, the next gen Raven Ridge APU is meant for that task. A lot of people will point out that you have to buy a separate graphic card, but if your actually gaming on this processor your going to want an actual graphic card as the built-in gpu's that you may find on certain processors have pretty poor performance. I have extra video cards laying around so I didn't care about a built-in gpu. I built a file server with this processor. I could of used the 1200 instead, but I like leaving myself some headroom for the future and spending an extra twenty dollars didn't matter to me so I splurged. I have a few extra AM3 compatible heatsinks laying around and used a ZALMAN CNPS9500A that had never been used. Needless to say, at stock speed with that cooler on it, there is no problem keeping it running super-cool. That stock cooler that comes with it would be perfectly fine to use at stock speed, but if you are going to overclock, do yourself, and your CPU a favor and buy a better heatsink.
originally posted on ebay.com
First gen? No problem! This will keep purring along until Zen2 comes along and you crave that as well. "Only" 6 cores? Greatest value nevertheless! No heatsink originally provided by AMD? Pfft! Stable temps all around with an itty bitty NH-D9L... (my case only fits that so that's that, go bigger if that's your cup of tea) If installed on a CH6 hero then adjust LLC to L1/instead of auto to make sure, configure core voltage from auto to offset voltage to "-" with 0.1 as reference value to keep voltage ranges below the high 1.4's that are auto conf'd by the mobo and you're gtg. If you're manually OC'ing then do your thing and read the ton of guides that are out there and find your own enlightenment.
| General | |
| Product Type | Processor |
| Processor | |
| Type / Form Factor | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
| Number of Cores | 6-core |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor (YD160XBCAEWOF)
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Ryzen 5 1600X R5 1600X 3.6 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 95W L3=16M YD160XBCM6IAE Socket
Free delivery
Amd Ryzen5 1600x R5-1600x 3.6ghz 6core12thr 95w Socket Am4 Cpu
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
AMD Ryzen5 1600X R5-1600X 3.6GHz 6Core12Thr 95W Socket AM4 CPU Processors Tested
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.60 GHz Hexa-Core (YD160XBCM6IAE) Processor
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
So, you may have noticed that I wrote the same thing in the Pros and Cons. Not a mistake. I was running an AMD 6300 in an Abit Mobo with SLI GTX 660's. The chip wasn't really up to the task and between the Mobo, the 6300, and the issues running SLI I had a rig that ran great one minute and crashed out the next. T-shooting the system revealed nothing so I can't blame any one component. It was a group effort that created a crazy hot girlfriend of a machine. She'd make you scream with pleasure one moment and anger the next. I was waiting for an excuse to change things up and the Ryzen chips provided that something. When building your own machine and looking for the "best" you have to look at performance per dollar even if you have unlimited funds because the "best" can ... MoreSo, you may have noticed that I wrote the same thing in the Pros and Cons. Not a mistake. I was running an AMD 6300 in an Abit Mobo with SLI GTX 660's. The chip wasn't really up to the task and between the Mobo, the 6300, and the issues running SLI I had a rig that ran great one minute and crashed out the next. T-shooting the system revealed nothing so I can't blame any one component. It was a group effort that created a crazy hot girlfriend of a machine. She'd make you scream with pleasure one moment and anger the next. I was waiting for an excuse to change things up and the Ryzen chips provided that something. When building your own machine and looking for the "best" you have to look at performance per dollar even if you have unlimited funds because the "best" can be subjective. On paper my SLI'd cards were supposed to be as good as comparable top end cards. Maybe they were, but I am guessing that the top end cards didn't crash as much as my dual power suckers. I'd failed to really appreciate the relationship of performance and compatibility. Dumb, because compatibility results in stability. Compatibility = Performance = Stability = Speed So, when I started looking for a new cpu to replace my aging 6300 I immediately looked at the "other" guys. Everyone, all the commercials and advertising that is, says that Intel is the way to go. If advertisements say they are the best then it must be true, right? To be honest, there is much more support out there for them. Also to be honest, I didn't feel like I lost much power due to my chipset compared to other chips of the day. My problem was compatibility. It wasn't AMD's fault that I put together an unstable rig. So, I did a side by side multi-week research session before upgrading my system. I compared the very best to the middle of the road. I looked at overclocking, gaming, stability, support, data processing, etc. My goal was to get a chip that would last through a couple of upgrades (maybe 3-5 years) and still perform well for the average user who games. AMD Ryzen chips exceeded all of my expectations for much less than Intel. Haters and fan boys have at it. Walk around your house "makin' it rain" with all the money you paid for a blue and silver sticker to place on your tower. Me? I bought stability and performance. Yeah, performance. AMD Ryzen, kids. This chip is BA. I only wish I would have went with the R7 1800X. I went with just less than the best because I bought into the Intel hype. Mistake...if you can afford it and it makes sense at all then run the R7. You won't regret it. Ultimately, I am more than impressed with this chip. The 6300 was good in its time. The 1600x? WOW. I'm really glad that I took the time to do the research. Here is my set-up: ATX case, Ryzen 5 1600X, AM4+ ASRock X370 Killer SLI MOBO, Team Dark Pro 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3000, Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB, and an MSI Core Frozr L cooler I plan on upgrading to 32GB of ram in the near future but this thing is STABLE AND FAST. It is more chip than I use. When/if I feel the chipset is the issue I will go with another AMD. They stepped up their game. I'm impressed.
This processor and the R3 1200 exist as an inexpensive means to get into a AM4 platform where overall processor performance isn't the priority. Not really meant to go head to head against intel's lower end processors, the next gen Raven Ridge APU is meant for that task. A lot of people will point out that you have to buy a separate graphic card, but if your actually gaming on this processor your going to want an actual graphic card as the built-in gpu's that you may find on certain processors have pretty poor performance. I have extra video cards laying around so I didn't care about a built-in gpu. I built a file server with this processor. I could of used the 1200 instead, but I like leaving myself some headroom for the future and spending an extra twenty dollars ... MoreThis processor and the R3 1200 exist as an inexpensive means to get into a AM4 platform where overall processor performance isn't the priority. Not really meant to go head to head against intel's lower end processors, the next gen Raven Ridge APU is meant for that task. A lot of people will point out that you have to buy a separate graphic card, but if your actually gaming on this processor your going to want an actual graphic card as the built-in gpu's that you may find on certain processors have pretty poor performance. I have extra video cards laying around so I didn't care about a built-in gpu. I built a file server with this processor. I could of used the 1200 instead, but I like leaving myself some headroom for the future and spending an extra twenty dollars didn't matter to me so I splurged. I have a few extra AM3 compatible heatsinks laying around and used a ZALMAN CNPS9500A that had never been used. Needless to say, at stock speed with that cooler on it, there is no problem keeping it running super-cool. That stock cooler that comes with it would be perfectly fine to use at stock speed, but if you are going to overclock, do yourself, and your CPU a favor and buy a better heatsink.
First gen? No problem! This will keep purring along until Zen2 comes along and you crave that as well. "Only" 6 cores? Greatest value nevertheless! No heatsink originally provided by AMD? Pfft! Stable temps all around with an itty bitty NH-D9L... (my case only fits that so that's that, go bigger if that's your cup of tea) If installed on a CH6 hero then adjust LLC to L1/instead of auto to make sure, configure core voltage from auto to offset voltage to "-" with 0.1 as reference value to keep voltage ranges below the high 1.4's that are auto conf'd by the mobo and you're gtg. If you're manually OC'ing then do your thing and read the ton of guides that are out there and find your own enlightenment.
It's been great so far. I overclocked it all the way up to 4.0 GHZ yesterday, although my particular processor needs too much extra voltage to safely do that, so I dropped it back down to 3.9 and I can leave it at that 24/7. You may get lucky and get one that can handle it better than mine did, if you're so inclined to try. I happened to get this on combo pack sale when combo'd with an ASRock AB350 Fatal1ty Gaming K4 motherboard for 50$ off, plus the Motherboard was 5$ off already AND had a 20$ rebate going on. So that's why I got this, I was originally gonna go with the 1600 model because that's a bit cheaper and has it's own CPU fan already (which is quite good from what I've read). But the discounts made it worthwhile to upgrade to the slightly higher model, and ... MoreIt's been great so far. I overclocked it all the way up to 4.0 GHZ yesterday, although my particular processor needs too much extra voltage to safely do that, so I dropped it back down to 3.9 and I can leave it at that 24/7. You may get lucky and get one that can handle it better than mine did, if you're so inclined to try. I happened to get this on combo pack sale when combo'd with an ASRock AB350 Fatal1ty Gaming K4 motherboard for 50$ off, plus the Motherboard was 5$ off already AND had a 20$ rebate going on. So that's why I got this, I was originally gonna go with the 1600 model because that's a bit cheaper and has it's own CPU fan already (which is quite good from what I've read). But the discounts made it worthwhile to upgrade to the slightly higher model, and I haven't been disappointed at all with it! With a Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO CPU fan, I've been at about 30c for base temperature and even during stress tests and overclocking, I think the highest it's gotten is 70c. So, it's worked great and I highly recommend it to everyone.
I recently have been playing with some new hardware and tested a Ryzen 7 1700, Intel Core i7 7700K and now the Ryzen R5 1600X. I use my PC for gaming at 2560x1440 and for Photoshop . I was an early adopter when I purchased the 1700 and had quite a few issues getting memory to run at 3200mhz and to be honest it spoilt the experience for me, so I sold the 1700 and moved on to the Core i7 7700K. In all fairness I bought the 7700K to play with a delidding tool and after running a few tests I sold the cpu on and have now purchased the 1600X for my personal use and I could not be happier. The current AMD code and bios’ are much more stable and I have had no issues running my ram at its stated 3200mhz in my current Ryzen motherboard (Asrock Taichi X370). At stock settings ... MoreI recently have been playing with some new hardware and tested a Ryzen 7 1700, Intel Core i7 7700K and now the Ryzen R5 1600X. I use my PC for gaming at 2560x1440 and for Photoshop . I was an early adopter when I purchased the 1700 and had quite a few issues getting memory to run at 3200mhz and to be honest it spoilt the experience for me, so I sold the 1700 and moved on to the Core i7 7700K. In all fairness I bought the 7700K to play with a delidding tool and after running a few tests I sold the cpu on and have now purchased the 1600X for my personal use and I could not be happier. The current AMD code and bios’ are much more stable and I have had no issues running my ram at its stated 3200mhz in my current Ryzen motherboard (Asrock Taichi X370). At stock settings the 1700 runs at 3.00ghz and boosts to 3.7ghz (2 cores), the 1600X runs at 3.6ghz and boosts to 4.00ghz (2 cores) and in some cases will boost to 4.10ghz (single core), the 7700K is 4 core 8 thread cpu that is clocked at 4.2ghz and will boost to 4.50ghz. In terms of pure gaming performance at stock, with most games I found the 7700K to be fastest, with the 1600X trailing by around 6-8% (at 2560x1440 with GTX 1080) and the 1700 trailing at 15%. This is not really surprising as few games take advantage currently of more than 4 cores, so the c lock speed of the 7700K and the advantage of the core architecture provides better performance in game, however this is really only noticeable at lower resolutions where games are more cpu limited, at 2560x1440 games will be gpu limited, so frame rate differences are minimal at best. Where this cpu shines is in productivity. The 6 fast cores of the 1600X and 12 threads make short work of any intensive work that I do on my computer, video rendering, photoshop creation or database analysis. At stock it feels much faster than the 7700K and the 1700, even though the 1700 has an additional 2 cores and 4 threads. When overclocked to 4.00ghz the 1700 pulls ahead of the 1600X (at 4.00ghz) due to the extra cores and threads and both scream past the i7 7700K (even when overclocked to 5.00ghz) in productivity. The i7 7700K is still faster by around 8% in games, although it is also over $100 more expensive than the 1600X. I really like this cpu, it is not far off the 7700K for gaming at stock (2560x1440) and is 3 times as fast as the 7700K rendering video and photoshop and it’s $100 cheaper. Performance of the Ryzen will only improve as more developers optimize for more cores and threads and the platform matures. I still need to shake myself every so often to remind myself that I have a 6 core 12 thread cpu that cost a little over $200. If you want to overclock and are lucky with the silicon lottery then the 1600 is an even better buy as, based on my testing most Ryzen 5 and 7’s can run at 4.00ghz on all cores. The 1600X stock speed really negates the need for me to overclock, so I’m not bothering. I’m just running this cpu at stock and enjoying the experience. I don’t really have anything negative to say about this cpu. Great value and performance. If you just want to game on your pc then Intel may still provide better overall performance at 1080 resolution, however if you want to do other things with your pc or game at higher resolutions then the Ryzen 1600X is more future proof than either the core i5 7600 or core i7 7700k (IMO)…
Yes, the R7 1800X is more powerful, yes it has that fancy cooler, but you're getting about 75% of that CPU for about 50% of the price.I picked this up about a month after the original R7 CPUs were released for a partial rebuild of my machine. As far as performance goes, it's a huge jump up from the old AMD FX-series chips. With the same GPU fitted I found FPS more or less doubled in the Rise of the Tomb Raider benchmark, everything maxed out, coming in at just a nudge under 60FPS average paired with an RX480, which I'm more than happy with.If you're looking for pure gaming performance then Intel may still be a better choice in terms of the speed you get from a single core but if you use your PC for other things, and you're looking for a more versatile machine I ... MoreYes, the R7 1800X is more powerful, yes it has that fancy cooler, but you're getting about 75% of that CPU for about 50% of the price.I picked this up about a month after the original R7 CPUs were released for a partial rebuild of my machine. As far as performance goes, it's a huge jump up from the old AMD FX-series chips. With the same GPU fitted I found FPS more or less doubled in the Rise of the Tomb Raider benchmark, everything maxed out, coming in at just a nudge under 60FPS average paired with an RX480, which I'm more than happy with.If you're looking for pure gaming performance then Intel may still be a better choice in terms of the speed you get from a single core but if you use your PC for other things, and you're looking for a more versatile machine I think this is the better chip given the higher core/thread count. It may well age better if multi-core finally takes off for gaming.The only downside to this CPU currently is that it doesn't ship with a stock cooler, unlike the other Ryzen CPUs. That means you'll need to pick up a third-party cooling option and there isn't a huge variety to choose from at the moment, given the completely novel mounting bracket.That detracts from the value of the package somewhat, making the straight R5 1600 with the Wraith cooler possibly more attractive if you don't want the fuss. On the other hand, the 1600X is probably a better binned CPU, so you pay your money and takes your choice, I suppose.I certainly have no complaints here.
I'm going to be honest: I did not like AMD CPUs (or GPUs, but I won't get into that) for the longest time. I had an older FX-6300 briefly, and that taught me "maybe I should spend a bit more and go with Intel." I continued on that train for years, trying different Intel CPUs. They were fantastic for gaming, but trying to stream (mostly with the i5s) were a travesty. A couple months ago, I decided to jump back into making a new computer. And, to be honest, I fell into the Ryzen hype-train. So I bought an Asrock X370 K4 and a R5 1600x, along with a Corsair H80iv2. After about a month (getting all the bios stuff in,) the 1600x really showed its stuff. Everything seemed a bit faster than it use to be compared to my i5 6600k, including streaming, multitasking...even ... MoreI'm going to be honest: I did not like AMD CPUs (or GPUs, but I won't get into that) for the longest time. I had an older FX-6300 briefly, and that taught me "maybe I should spend a bit more and go with Intel." I continued on that train for years, trying different Intel CPUs. They were fantastic for gaming, but trying to stream (mostly with the i5s) were a travesty. A couple months ago, I decided to jump back into making a new computer. And, to be honest, I fell into the Ryzen hype-train. So I bought an Asrock X370 K4 and a R5 1600x, along with a Corsair H80iv2. After about a month (getting all the bios stuff in,) the 1600x really showed its stuff. Everything seemed a bit faster than it use to be compared to my i5 6600k, including streaming, multitasking...even gaming to a certain degree. It was just amazing. Best part? I could just set it to 3.9Ghz with a 1.3625v and it was completely stable (though, that may not happen to everyone. That said, the 1600x is binned via voltage...so it probably will.) Because of this...my max temp was Now, some people will point out that the i7 is just better for gaming. While I agree with that to a certain extent, the difference was so small (and, sometimes, the Ryzen chip had better minimums) that I can't actually recommend any of the mainstream intel CPUs (Kaby Lake I mean) if they're doing anything more than gaming. Ryzen is just that good. Now, it isn't all roses. To get the most out of the gaming part of this CPU, you HAVE to get above 2666Mhz ram. Unfortunantely, that also costs quite a bit. So, if you're going for a budget build, you HAVE to keep that in mind. All-in-all, the R5 1600x is a fantastic CPU and I am very glad I bought it.
Can't speak to Windows usage, but on Linux using a Gnome plugin called CPUFreq, I can set my system to "Performance" and get 3.6 GHz all cores under full load (Blender renders), and single core boosts to 3.7+ GHz. This is using default automatic settings in my MSI B450M BIOS, not overclocking with MSI Game Boost nor manual multiplier adjustments. I can also choose to set "Power Saving" mode for those times I'm just web browsing. I spent some time tweaking the fan profiles in BIOS. At first the fan noise seemed to be too much at idle speeds. This has more to do with the MSI defaults than the Ryzen CPU, however. All in all, a very satisfied customer. I'll be looking to upgrade to newer Ryzen processors in the future.
- Old: I haven't gotten to play with overclocking it yet but it honestly runs like a dream at 38 degrees C in the stock config. Loads of Cache and cores means I don't have to worry about CPU bottle-necking for several years (fingers crossed). Going to update this review with my overclocking settings once I settle on a stable configuration. - Update: At stock configuration it runs AIDA64 at 3.7ghz (all cores) and boosts (with XFR) to 4.19~4.2 on a couple cores, but the voltage was reading around 1.375-1.38V in RyzenMaster which is higher than my 3.9ghz overclock (at 1.35V). This stock setting yielded a cinebench score of 1086 with my single 8GB memory stick at 2400hz. The stock Aida64 results showed full-load after an hour brought my temperatures to 52 degrees with ... More- Old: I haven't gotten to play with overclocking it yet but it honestly runs like a dream at 38 degrees C in the stock config. Loads of Cache and cores means I don't have to worry about CPU bottle-necking for several years (fingers crossed). Going to update this review with my overclocking settings once I settle on a stable configuration. - Update: At stock configuration it runs AIDA64 at 3.7ghz (all cores) and boosts (with XFR) to 4.19~4.2 on a couple cores, but the voltage was reading around 1.375-1.38V in RyzenMaster which is higher than my 3.9ghz overclock (at 1.35V). This stock setting yielded a cinebench score of 1086 with my single 8GB memory stick at 2400hz. The stock Aida64 results showed full-load after an hour brought my temperatures to 52 degrees with the XFR enabled. My 3.9 test had my 2400 Ram set to 2666 and cpu voltage set to 1.35. My cinebench score increased to 1303 WHICH IS A 17% PERFORMANCE BOOST. I still have to buy a second stick of memory but this thing is already running quite cool and has fantastic performance.
I'm glad AMD is back!! The CPU market has changed so much in the past year. AMD really shook things up. It's great to have competition again finally instead of having to pony up the dollar for an overpriced/performance ratio Intel CPU and motherboard. Six and eight core CPU's are now becoming mainstream. Thanks AMD :) Unlike Intel, these Ryzen chips are all soldered. Instead of using low quality TIM on a $300 plus chip. Really Intel!? Get it together and don't be so freaking cheap! You need to go back to soldering your processors! The last time I can remember they were soldered on mainstream processors was Sandy Bridge and that's going on almost a decade ago now! I was thinking of getting an R7 1700. But I wanted the guaranteed higher clock speed with the 1600x. At ... MoreI'm glad AMD is back!! The CPU market has changed so much in the past year. AMD really shook things up. It's great to have competition again finally instead of having to pony up the dollar for an overpriced/performance ratio Intel CPU and motherboard. Six and eight core CPU's are now becoming mainstream. Thanks AMD :) Unlike Intel, these Ryzen chips are all soldered. Instead of using low quality TIM on a $300 plus chip. Really Intel!? Get it together and don't be so freaking cheap! You need to go back to soldering your processors! The last time I can remember they were soldered on mainstream processors was Sandy Bridge and that's going on almost a decade ago now! I was thinking of getting an R7 1700. But I wanted the guaranteed higher clock speed with the 1600x. At some times I've seen this chip faster than the 1700 despite it having two less cores. It's nice to know AMD will be supporting the AM4 socket up to 2020 (unlike Intel with their sockets -_-). Maybe then I'll make the leap to an 8 core on Zen 3.
| General | |
| Product Type | Processor |
| Processor | |
| Type / Form Factor | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
| Number of Cores | 6-core |
