The fastest in the game Get the high speed gaming performance of the world's best desktop processor Testing by AMD performance labs as of 9/2/2020 based on the average FPS of 40 PC games at 1920x1080 with the High image quality preset using an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor vs. Core i9 10900K. Results may vary.
The fastest in the game Get the high speed gaming performance of the world's best desktop processor Testing by AMD performance labs as of 9/2/2020 based on the average FPS of 40 PC games at 1920x1080 with the High image quality preset using an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor vs. Core i9 10900K. Results may vary.
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X,12-Core/24 Threads, Max Freq 4.9GHz,70MB Cache Socket AM4 105W, Without Cooler
The fastest in the game Get the high speed gaming performance of the world's best desktop processor Testing by AMD performance labs as of 9/2/2020 based on the average FPS of 40 PC games at 1920x1080 with the High image quality preset using an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor vs. Core i9 10900K. Results may vary.
The fastest in the game Get the high speed gaming performance of the world's best desktop processor Testing by AMD performance labs as of 9/2/2020 based on the average FPS of 40 PC games at 1920x1080 with the High image quality preset using an AMD Ryzen 9 5900X processor vs. Core i9 10900K. Results may vary.
in 6 offers
The lowest price for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X,12-Core/24 Threads, Max Freq 4.9GHz,70MB Cache Socket AM4 105W, Without Cooler right now is $499.00 at Netplus Computers, compared across 6 retailers.
The all-time low was $350.77 on 18 Mar 2026 — today's price is 42% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 29 Sept 2026.
Last updated at 29/09/2026 04:12:46
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 3.7Ghz 12 Core 24 Thread AM4 - No Cooler
Delivery between 8–13 Oct $22
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor (Renewed)
Delivery between 6–9 Oct $29
AMD New val Ryzen 9 5900 X CPU Uned Desktop Processor with 12 Core 24 Thread Support Socket
Delivery $111.91
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12 Cores, 24 Threads 3.7GHz 64MB Unlocked Desktop Gaming Processor -
Delivery $52.51
Amd Ryzen 9 5900 X Cooler 3.7 G Hz 12 / 24 70 Mb 105 W 100 100000061 Wof []
Free delivery
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X Desktop Processor 12 Cores 4.8 GHz Socket Am4 Computer CPU
Free delivery
originally posted on newegg.com
I purchased the product due to the favorable price at the time and the need for the 3900X as a hand-me-down upgrade on a secondary system. I was expecting a more modest performance lift: 15% - 25% under most applications, 10% - 35% under highly threaded applications, perhaps as high as 50% in some standout games with most being significantly lower. Reality is the 5900X is more capable of using the thermal headroom than the 3900X. With a custom loop is the 5900X was able to boost 1-4 cores around 5.1GHz (no overclocking) on an MSI Prestige X570 Creation motherboard. The exact same setup allowed the 3900X to hit around 4.8GHz-4.9GHz for a single threaded application. Both processors were paired with the same nVidia GeForce 1080Ti, DDR4-3600 memory, custom water ... MoreI purchased the product due to the favorable price at the time and the need for the 3900X as a hand-me-down upgrade on a secondary system. I was expecting a more modest performance lift: 15% - 25% under most applications, 10% - 35% under highly threaded applications, perhaps as high as 50% in some standout games with most being significantly lower. Reality is the 5900X is more capable of using the thermal headroom than the 3900X. With a custom loop is the 5900X was able to boost 1-4 cores around 5.1GHz (no overclocking) on an MSI Prestige X570 Creation motherboard. The exact same setup allowed the 3900X to hit around 4.8GHz-4.9GHz for a single threaded application. Both processors were paired with the same nVidia GeForce 1080Ti, DDR4-3600 memory, custom water cooling loop and MSI Prestige X570 Creation motherboard. To give a best case example: the 5900X was able to boost my 3DMarks CPU score from just over 18000 to just under 36000. The overall 3DMarks score went from about 9000 to about 14000. Highly threaded applications improved closer to 50%. Moderately threaded applications (4 threads), improved by nearly 80%. Lightly threaded applications improved by around 35% on average. Keep in mind that this is not scientific. There was no clean installation of software or the likes. I just swapped out the processor and started testing. My working theory as to why the results differ somewhat (lower single threaded, higher multi-threaded) from reviews I've read is that, with my custom water loop, the difference in frequency for a single thread was less than expected (the 3900X boosted a little higher than normal) where the difference in frequency for multiple threads was higher than expected.
originally posted on ebay.com
The AMD 5900X is a top-of-the-line CPU that offers exceptional performance and power. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it's ideal for demanding applications like gaming, video editing, and virtualization. The processor has a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz, which can be boosted up to 4.8 GHz, making it one of the fastest CPUs on the market. One of the main advantages of the AMD 5900X is its performance compared to its competitors. It outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900K in most benchmarks, including single-core and multi-core performance. The price to performance ratio is also impressive, making it a great value for its cost. However, the AMD 5900X does have some drawbacks. It runs hot and has a high power draw, which may be a concern for users who want a more ... MoreThe AMD 5900X is a top-of-the-line CPU that offers exceptional performance and power. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it's ideal for demanding applications like gaming, video editing, and virtualization. The processor has a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz, which can be boosted up to 4.8 GHz, making it one of the fastest CPUs on the market. One of the main advantages of the AMD 5900X is its performance compared to its competitors. It outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900K in most benchmarks, including single-core and multi-core performance. The price to performance ratio is also impressive, making it a great value for its cost. However, the AMD 5900X does have some drawbacks. It runs hot and has a high power draw, which may be a concern for users who want a more energy-efficient system. The high power draw also means that it requires a high-quality power supply to function properly. In summary, the AMD 5900X is a powerful CPU that delivers exceptional performance and value. It outperforms its competitors in most benchmarks and offers a great price to performance ratio. However, it runs hot and has a high power draw, which may be a concern for users who want a more energy-efficient system. Overall, the AMD 5900X is a great choice for those who need a high-performance CPU for demanding applications.
originally posted on bestbuy.com
I'm going to be honest, I was not expecting huge gains coming from a Ryzen 5600x. And you are probably wondering, why would you upgrade twice in a single product cycle? Well the short answer is that the availability of the 5900x when it first came out was... lacking to say the least so I had to make due with the 5600x. At the time, the six-core processor was more than capable to fit my needs. However over the past year, my work habits have changed and thus I demanded more from my workstation. Adding a second monitor was a great addition to help increase my multi-tasking capabilities. However this made me aware of the limitations of having fewer cores in my system.So I decided to go for this beast of a cpu, doubling the number of cores in my system. I kept my ... MoreI'm going to be honest, I was not expecting huge gains coming from a Ryzen 5600x. And you are probably wondering, why would you upgrade twice in a single product cycle? Well the short answer is that the availability of the 5900x when it first came out was... lacking to say the least so I had to make due with the 5600x. At the time, the six-core processor was more than capable to fit my needs. However over the past year, my work habits have changed and thus I demanded more from my workstation. Adding a second monitor was a great addition to help increase my multi-tasking capabilities. However this made me aware of the limitations of having fewer cores in my system.So I decided to go for this beast of a cpu, doubling the number of cores in my system. I kept my expectations in check of course, double the cores does not mean "doubling performance". And to be quite frank, in terms of raw performance, it's actually not that much quicker in running normal tasks... that is, at least on paper. Of course, if you run programs that can utilize all the performance, then yes it will be significantly faster. But I do not run such programs for my workload, just a heavy multi-tasker.To get to my point, this upgrade allowed me to experience something very different when it comes to "user experience". It isn't a massive jump in performance in gaming or running normal day to day applications. But it is that buttery smooth experience that you cannot explain on paper, nor run any test programs to measure a noticeable gain. And I think far too many times, we come to compare stats on paper without considering the "user experience". Many reviews on this cpu come to the conclusion that it is not that much quicker in gaming when compared to its little brother, the 5600x. But I guarantee you, that 5600x will have the occasional micro-stutters, or it takes a few extra seconds to install a program.Basically, my point is that most people will not need this level of performance and if you are strictly on a budget, a 5600x is your best bet. For example, imagine owning a normal, economic car vs. a high end luxury car. Both will get you from point A to point B. I'd even go as far to say that they'll probably get you there in similar times. In terms of transportation, they both will do the job. However, the luxury car will just do it in comfort, and it's just nice to be in one isn't it. Similarly, the 5900x is that luxury bracket, the user experience is what you get with 12 cores :)
| Processor | 4.8 GHz ryzen_9 |
| CPU manufacturer | AMD |
| CPU model | Ryzen 9 |
| CPU speed | 4.8 GHz |
| CPU socket | Socket AM4 |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 3.7Ghz 12 Core 24 Thread AM4 - No Cooler
Delivery between 8–13 Oct $22
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-core, 24-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor (Renewed)
Delivery between 6–9 Oct $29
AMD New val Ryzen 9 5900 X CPU Uned Desktop Processor with 12 Core 24 Thread Support Socket
Delivery $111.91
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12 Cores, 24 Threads 3.7GHz 64MB Unlocked Desktop Gaming Processor -
Delivery $52.51
Amd Ryzen 9 5900 X Cooler 3.7 G Hz 12 / 24 70 Mb 105 W 100 100000061 Wof []
Free delivery
I purchased the product due to the favorable price at the time and the need for the 3900X as a hand-me-down upgrade on a secondary system. I was expecting a more modest performance lift: 15% - 25% under most applications, 10% - 35% under highly threaded applications, perhaps as high as 50% in some standout games with most being significantly lower. Reality is the 5900X is more capable of using the thermal headroom than the 3900X. With a custom loop is the 5900X was able to boost 1-4 cores around 5.1GHz (no overclocking) on an MSI Prestige X570 Creation motherboard. The exact same setup allowed the 3900X to hit around 4.8GHz-4.9GHz for a single threaded application. Both processors were paired with the same nVidia GeForce 1080Ti, DDR4-3600 memory, custom water ... MoreI purchased the product due to the favorable price at the time and the need for the 3900X as a hand-me-down upgrade on a secondary system. I was expecting a more modest performance lift: 15% - 25% under most applications, 10% - 35% under highly threaded applications, perhaps as high as 50% in some standout games with most being significantly lower. Reality is the 5900X is more capable of using the thermal headroom than the 3900X. With a custom loop is the 5900X was able to boost 1-4 cores around 5.1GHz (no overclocking) on an MSI Prestige X570 Creation motherboard. The exact same setup allowed the 3900X to hit around 4.8GHz-4.9GHz for a single threaded application. Both processors were paired with the same nVidia GeForce 1080Ti, DDR4-3600 memory, custom water cooling loop and MSI Prestige X570 Creation motherboard. To give a best case example: the 5900X was able to boost my 3DMarks CPU score from just over 18000 to just under 36000. The overall 3DMarks score went from about 9000 to about 14000. Highly threaded applications improved closer to 50%. Moderately threaded applications (4 threads), improved by nearly 80%. Lightly threaded applications improved by around 35% on average. Keep in mind that this is not scientific. There was no clean installation of software or the likes. I just swapped out the processor and started testing. My working theory as to why the results differ somewhat (lower single threaded, higher multi-threaded) from reviews I've read is that, with my custom water loop, the difference in frequency for a single thread was less than expected (the 3900X boosted a little higher than normal) where the difference in frequency for multiple threads was higher than expected.
The AMD 5900X is a top-of-the-line CPU that offers exceptional performance and power. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it's ideal for demanding applications like gaming, video editing, and virtualization. The processor has a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz, which can be boosted up to 4.8 GHz, making it one of the fastest CPUs on the market. One of the main advantages of the AMD 5900X is its performance compared to its competitors. It outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900K in most benchmarks, including single-core and multi-core performance. The price to performance ratio is also impressive, making it a great value for its cost. However, the AMD 5900X does have some drawbacks. It runs hot and has a high power draw, which may be a concern for users who want a more ... MoreThe AMD 5900X is a top-of-the-line CPU that offers exceptional performance and power. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it's ideal for demanding applications like gaming, video editing, and virtualization. The processor has a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz, which can be boosted up to 4.8 GHz, making it one of the fastest CPUs on the market. One of the main advantages of the AMD 5900X is its performance compared to its competitors. It outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900K in most benchmarks, including single-core and multi-core performance. The price to performance ratio is also impressive, making it a great value for its cost. However, the AMD 5900X does have some drawbacks. It runs hot and has a high power draw, which may be a concern for users who want a more energy-efficient system. The high power draw also means that it requires a high-quality power supply to function properly. In summary, the AMD 5900X is a powerful CPU that delivers exceptional performance and value. It outperforms its competitors in most benchmarks and offers a great price to performance ratio. However, it runs hot and has a high power draw, which may be a concern for users who want a more energy-efficient system. Overall, the AMD 5900X is a great choice for those who need a high-performance CPU for demanding applications.
I'm going to be honest, I was not expecting huge gains coming from a Ryzen 5600x. And you are probably wondering, why would you upgrade twice in a single product cycle? Well the short answer is that the availability of the 5900x when it first came out was... lacking to say the least so I had to make due with the 5600x. At the time, the six-core processor was more than capable to fit my needs. However over the past year, my work habits have changed and thus I demanded more from my workstation. Adding a second monitor was a great addition to help increase my multi-tasking capabilities. However this made me aware of the limitations of having fewer cores in my system.So I decided to go for this beast of a cpu, doubling the number of cores in my system. I kept my ... MoreI'm going to be honest, I was not expecting huge gains coming from a Ryzen 5600x. And you are probably wondering, why would you upgrade twice in a single product cycle? Well the short answer is that the availability of the 5900x when it first came out was... lacking to say the least so I had to make due with the 5600x. At the time, the six-core processor was more than capable to fit my needs. However over the past year, my work habits have changed and thus I demanded more from my workstation. Adding a second monitor was a great addition to help increase my multi-tasking capabilities. However this made me aware of the limitations of having fewer cores in my system.So I decided to go for this beast of a cpu, doubling the number of cores in my system. I kept my expectations in check of course, double the cores does not mean "doubling performance". And to be quite frank, in terms of raw performance, it's actually not that much quicker in running normal tasks... that is, at least on paper. Of course, if you run programs that can utilize all the performance, then yes it will be significantly faster. But I do not run such programs for my workload, just a heavy multi-tasker.To get to my point, this upgrade allowed me to experience something very different when it comes to "user experience". It isn't a massive jump in performance in gaming or running normal day to day applications. But it is that buttery smooth experience that you cannot explain on paper, nor run any test programs to measure a noticeable gain. And I think far too many times, we come to compare stats on paper without considering the "user experience". Many reviews on this cpu come to the conclusion that it is not that much quicker in gaming when compared to its little brother, the 5600x. But I guarantee you, that 5600x will have the occasional micro-stutters, or it takes a few extra seconds to install a program.Basically, my point is that most people will not need this level of performance and if you are strictly on a budget, a 5600x is your best bet. For example, imagine owning a normal, economic car vs. a high end luxury car. Both will get you from point A to point B. I'd even go as far to say that they'll probably get you there in similar times. In terms of transportation, they both will do the job. However, the luxury car will just do it in comfort, and it's just nice to be in one isn't it. Similarly, the 5900x is that luxury bracket, the user experience is what you get with 12 cores :)
I ordered this on a Friday, and it was scheduled to arrive on the following Tuesday, but it instead arrived on Monday - I was incredibly happy with this.I did a lot of research before buying this CPU, and it has proven to be exactly what the reviews (GamersNexus) had demonstrated it would be. Incredible for gaming, awesome for productivity, cost effective and low on the temperature range too!I buy and rip & compress Blu Ray movies - this cut the compression time in half versus the 5600x CPU that I had previously. The 5600x would average 14fps, whereas the 5900x averages 28fps. This is somewhat to be expected as the 5900x is 2 5600x CPUs on 1 package, but it is still awesome.CPU usage while gaming went from an overall usage (Guild Wars 2) of ~30% to ~40% down ... MoreI ordered this on a Friday, and it was scheduled to arrive on the following Tuesday, but it instead arrived on Monday - I was incredibly happy with this.I did a lot of research before buying this CPU, and it has proven to be exactly what the reviews (GamersNexus) had demonstrated it would be. Incredible for gaming, awesome for productivity, cost effective and low on the temperature range too!I buy and rip & compress Blu Ray movies - this cut the compression time in half versus the 5600x CPU that I had previously. The 5600x would average 14fps, whereas the 5900x averages 28fps. This is somewhat to be expected as the 5900x is 2 5600x CPUs on 1 package, but it is still awesome.CPU usage while gaming went from an overall usage (Guild Wars 2) of ~30% to ~40% down to around 15%.It should be pretty obvious, but I am incredibly happy with this CPU and would've purchased it instead of my 5600x if I had paid attention to more fact based reviews previously.With how quickly this CPU shipped & arrived, I would gladly buy again from B&H.
I was considering whether to build a new system with an Intel I5-13600K or the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X. The 5900x uses less power and has more cores and threads. Moreover, all of its cores are equal, so you won't run into issues of Windows 10/11 scheduling tasks running on Intel 12th/13th gen. that you want done on the P-cores to its E-cores. While the I5-13600K is faster on single-threaded tasks, obviously the 5900X is better on multithreaded tasks (making it more of a workstation processor). Also, I already had an AMD AM4 board compatible with the 5900X, so I was able to install it and be ready to go. It's very responsive and complete overkill for most desktop tasks. It seems about 33% faster per thread than my previous Ryzen R7 3700X. Since I do very few productivity ... MoreI was considering whether to build a new system with an Intel I5-13600K or the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X. The 5900x uses less power and has more cores and threads. Moreover, all of its cores are equal, so you won't run into issues of Windows 10/11 scheduling tasks running on Intel 12th/13th gen. that you want done on the P-cores to its E-cores. While the I5-13600K is faster on single-threaded tasks, obviously the 5900X is better on multithreaded tasks (making it more of a workstation processor). Also, I already had an AMD AM4 board compatible with the 5900X, so I was able to install it and be ready to go. It's very responsive and complete overkill for most desktop tasks. It seems about 33% faster per thread than my previous Ryzen R7 3700X. Since I do very few productivity tasks, tbh I don't know how I'm going to make use of 12 cores and 24 threads.
Went from a 3600x to this. Prior system config had a number of issues, some were known causes (5700xt + PCIe gen 4, looking at you). With new setup, there were improvements across the board. Everything is smoother and faster.Used primarily for gaming and photo editing, I was a little surprised at the improvement it brought to gaming. The fps improved noticeably, but more importantly everything also became smoother, fewer stutters and moments of lower frame count. I don't think the 3600x should have been bottlenecking anything on the prior configuration. I was able to rule out thermal paste or CPU cooler issues (and used the same on the new CPU) so whether some problems I had before were due to bad luck on the CPU lot draw, or improvements in other areas of CPU ... MoreWent from a 3600x to this. Prior system config had a number of issues, some were known causes (5700xt + PCIe gen 4, looking at you). With new setup, there were improvements across the board. Everything is smoother and faster.Used primarily for gaming and photo editing, I was a little surprised at the improvement it brought to gaming. The fps improved noticeably, but more importantly everything also became smoother, fewer stutters and moments of lower frame count. I don't think the 3600x should have been bottlenecking anything on the prior configuration. I was able to rule out thermal paste or CPU cooler issues (and used the same on the new CPU) so whether some problems I had before were due to bad luck on the CPU lot draw, or improvements in other areas of CPU tech between generations, etc. the end result was that the machine actually feels like it's now high end, especially after upgrading the GPU now as well.Bottom line is that this is a great processor. It was hard to justify at the prices when released, but once it dropped below 400 after the 5800x3d cpu came out, I couldn't pass it up. It should last me some years before I feel the need to jump to the new socket. If you're already on AM4 this is easily worth it, but if you need a full new system and can wait a bit, it might be better to get the newer gen socket when it comes out.
I used this CPU in a computer that was primarily used for software development and some gaming. Either way, this CPU crushed every workload I threw at it without much of a problem. It might not be the best CPU for gaming, but it's pretty good.The only problem I have with it (and is something I was at least partially aware of when I purchased it) is that it gets hot and takes a good cooler to keep it cool. Even then, expect to hear the fans fire up regularly when doing any kind of work or gaming. It's not the end of the world, but it can be a bit annoying when on calls or even during the course of the day to hear the fans constantly ramping up and down. It's not a problem with this CPU, it's just the reality with most modern high-end CPUs.It's a great value with ... MoreI used this CPU in a computer that was primarily used for software development and some gaming. Either way, this CPU crushed every workload I threw at it without much of a problem. It might not be the best CPU for gaming, but it's pretty good.The only problem I have with it (and is something I was at least partially aware of when I purchased it) is that it gets hot and takes a good cooler to keep it cool. Even then, expect to hear the fans fire up regularly when doing any kind of work or gaming. It's not the end of the world, but it can be a bit annoying when on calls or even during the course of the day to hear the fans constantly ramping up and down. It's not a problem with this CPU, it's just the reality with most modern high-end CPUs.It's a great value with it's current pricing at ~$350, but if I were to buy a new CPU today, I would likely go for one of the Ryzen 7000 non-X cpus which provide great performance at much lower temperatures and power usage.If you already have an AM4 motherboard and need an upgrade, this is a great CPU. Otherwise, invest in a newer platform such as AM5 and the newer, more efficient chips.
Love my Ryzen 9. I was a little curious about AMD, because in the past they had been slower, but not anymore. I think they've been pretty good since 3 series, and really good here in the 5th series. I'm not sure what more next gen processors do, but this one does all I need it to do and fast! Anything local to my drive comes up instantly. I use it to game and for productivity, whether video editing or image editing, zero issues, even though those are done in large part with the graphics card. I've had a billion windows and videos open and no stutter. It just barrels through it all. I'm can't get technical on the cores and threads, because I'm not that deep in PC language, but like I said, it handles everything I do and fast. It's probably overkill for what I use it ... MoreLove my Ryzen 9. I was a little curious about AMD, because in the past they had been slower, but not anymore. I think they've been pretty good since 3 series, and really good here in the 5th series. I'm not sure what more next gen processors do, but this one does all I need it to do and fast! Anything local to my drive comes up instantly. I use it to game and for productivity, whether video editing or image editing, zero issues, even though those are done in large part with the graphics card. I've had a billion windows and videos open and no stutter. It just barrels through it all. I'm can't get technical on the cores and threads, because I'm not that deep in PC language, but like I said, it handles everything I do and fast. It's probably overkill for what I use it for, but I don't like lag at all, so I'm happy there isn't any here. For someone who isn't that savy, building a PC isn't hard and I encourage you to try as long as you know your build specs, can find the software for your components and are at least a little mechanically inclined, you can use youtube for guidance. Don't waste money on prebuilds, use pcpartspicker dot com and build one. You get to choose the quality of all the parts in your build, not just the ones with the flashy specs the pre-builts draw you in with. It theirs is cheap, they cheaped out somewhere, like the RAM, PSU, motherboard, storage drive, case or fans. They just show you a decent processor, flashy graphics card and high amount of RAM, but a cheap foundation will rear its ugly head eventually. I'm not sure why the rant, but nevertheless, consider building your own. If anything it's cathartic and great to learn.
Great shipping time, package came fast. Great price for this CPU. I needed an upgrade because of the advancements to design programs like from Unreal Engine 4 to version 5 and also some other programs that I use as well. It does run hotter than the 2700x but it also handles more and a lot quicker too. It also doesn't get as hot as the 2700x during heavy scenes as well. So, its just hotter during normal workloads but not as hot during heavy workloads.I haven't experimented on this cpu with baking hair cards in blender yet but with the jump from the 2700x I am sure that it will shorten my times based on how fast it handles my other programs. I use the Noctua NH-D15S to cool the CPU. I grabbed an extra 140mm fan for the cooling tower and I get at least an extra 10C ... MoreGreat shipping time, package came fast. Great price for this CPU. I needed an upgrade because of the advancements to design programs like from Unreal Engine 4 to version 5 and also some other programs that I use as well. It does run hotter than the 2700x but it also handles more and a lot quicker too. It also doesn't get as hot as the 2700x during heavy scenes as well. So, its just hotter during normal workloads but not as hot during heavy workloads.I haven't experimented on this cpu with baking hair cards in blender yet but with the jump from the 2700x I am sure that it will shorten my times based on how fast it handles my other programs. I use the Noctua NH-D15S to cool the CPU. I grabbed an extra 140mm fan for the cooling tower and I get at least an extra 10C degrees cooler than just the single fan. I think the highest temp I hit in Unreal Engine 5 is about 68C. This is the same temp I hit with just a room that is AAA quality and also with a city loaded up as well. Temps stay relatively the same within a few degrees C between these scene size comparisons. Still haven't pushed my fans to 100 percent yet to keep it cool. About 70 percent is the max I have my fans pushed during heavy scenes. With the 2700x I was having to push my fans 100 percent and I was hitting 80C. I knew it was time for an upgrade because of that and this CPU(5900x) was just the right purchase.
I purchased my 5900X back in March of 2021, so not too long after its first availability. The original price was steep, but I knew that the 5900X would withstand the test of time. I am writing this review due to the current price cut of the other 5000-series processors and the phasing out of the AM4 platform.Plain and simply, this processor will be good to go for many years to come. Having 12 Zen 3 cores grants you substantial processing power. No games, including modern AAA titles that are known to be CPU-heavy, put this thing at 100% load. Sure, the more powerful Intel 12th + 13th Gen and Ryzen 7000 processors will beat the 5900X out, but most users will not even see a difference. Only in production uses will the newer processors be desirable. However, if you ... MoreI purchased my 5900X back in March of 2021, so not too long after its first availability. The original price was steep, but I knew that the 5900X would withstand the test of time. I am writing this review due to the current price cut of the other 5000-series processors and the phasing out of the AM4 platform.Plain and simply, this processor will be good to go for many years to come. Having 12 Zen 3 cores grants you substantial processing power. No games, including modern AAA titles that are known to be CPU-heavy, put this thing at 100% load. Sure, the more powerful Intel 12th + 13th Gen and Ryzen 7000 processors will beat the 5900X out, but most users will not even see a difference. Only in production uses will the newer processors be desirable. However, if you game or use not the most CPU-intensive programs, the 5900X is still overkill. When I use geographic information systems (GIS) to load up millions of points and to run spatial analyses, the 5900X provides me with smooth, stable frames and quick outputs.If you are still on AM4, or just don't wanna burn a hole in your pocket with buying the new family of motherboards+DDR5 RAM, but still want a really powerful processor, this is one of your best options. The current price is less than the 5800X at its launch, and $30 more than the 5600X when it first launched. If you still have AM4, you can probably plop this thing into your motherboard for a massive upgrade (you may need a BIOS update though). I can say for sure that I do not plan on switching to a new processor any time soon. Really, I don't need to with the 5900X in my system.
| Processor | 4.8 GHz ryzen_9 |
| CPU manufacturer | AMD |
| CPU model | Ryzen 9 |
| CPU speed | 4.8 GHz |
| CPU socket | Socket AM4 |
