The new and improved EOS C100 Mark II offers fast the ability for fast turnaround time to match existing workflows in a compact configuration. Loaded with powerful features and enhanced ergonomics, the EOS C100 Mark II is ideal for solo operations such as run-and-gun style shoot coverage as well as operation on cranes, sliders and unmanned drones. Designed to be used right-out-of-the-box, many would find the learning curve of the EOS C100 Mark II, a gradual and pleasant one.
The new and improved EOS C100 Mark II offers fast the ability for fast turnaround time to match existing workflows in a compact configuration. Loaded with powerful features and enhanced ergonomics, the EOS C100 Mark II is ideal for solo operations such as run-and-gun style shoot coverage as well as operation on cranes, sliders and unmanned drones. Designed to be used right-out-of-the-box, many would find the learning curve of the EOS C100 Mark II, a gradual and pleasant one.
in 3 offers
The lowest price for Canon EOS C100 MK II Cinema Camera Body (EF) right now is $1,103.15 at eBay.com.au, compared across 3 retailers.
The all-time low was $791.42 on 16 Apr 2026 — today's price is 39% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 18 July 2026.
Canon EOS C100 MK II Cinema Camera Body (EF)
The new and improved EOS C100 Mark II offers fast the ability for fast turnaround time to match existing workflows in a compact configuration. Loaded with powerful features and enhanced ergonomics, the EOS C100 Mark II is ideal for solo operations such as run-and-gun style shoot coverage as well as operation on cranes, sliders and unmanned drones. Designed to be used right-out-of-the-box, many would find the learning curve of the EOS C100 Mark II, a gradual and pleasant one.
The new and improved EOS C100 Mark II offers fast the ability for fast turnaround time to match existing workflows in a compact configuration. Loaded with powerful features and enhanced ergonomics, the EOS C100 Mark II is ideal for solo operations such as run-and-gun style shoot coverage as well as operation on cranes, sliders and unmanned drones. Designed to be used right-out-of-the-box, many would find the learning curve of the EOS C100 Mark II, a gradual and pleasant one.
Last updated at 18/07/2026 12:59:30
Canon EOS C100 Mark II Camera Camcorder - Black
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Canon EOS C100 Mark II Body with Dual Pixel CMOS AF
Delivery $141.83
Canon EOS C100 Mark II Cinema EOS Camera with Dual Pixel CMOS AF (Body Only) (Import)
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I have to say of all the camera's I have used, this is a logical step for people who use $15K cameras who want to minimize load and file size while still staying 100% professional... and it's a logical step up for people using DSLR or mirrorless cameras who are tired of limitations and set up issues. The camera is a work horse- reliability is key. I have filmed long interviews with the CIA, FBI, NSA, NIST and DEA whistleblower agents- the work I do can not stand for flimsy build quality or overly complicated codecs. I will say, exposure is everything, and feeding proper exposure to the AVCHD codec results in noise free images. I use custom profiles such as CinemaEX - always, I did my research as you should do for Custom Profiles. I recommend that anyone always ... MoreI have to say of all the camera's I have used, this is a logical step for people who use $15K cameras who want to minimize load and file size while still staying 100% professional... and it's a logical step up for people using DSLR or mirrorless cameras who are tired of limitations and set up issues. The camera is a work horse- reliability is key. I have filmed long interviews with the CIA, FBI, NSA, NIST and DEA whistleblower agents- the work I do can not stand for flimsy build quality or overly complicated codecs. I will say, exposure is everything, and feeding proper exposure to the AVCHD codec results in noise free images. I use custom profiles such as CinemaEX - always, I did my research as you should do for Custom Profiles. I recommend that anyone always overexpose +1 or more - use your histogram for proper exposure and you will have noise free moire free images that will jump out off the screen like a 3-d image. I do small adjustments in Premiere Pro CS6 with slight RGB s curve, use fast color corrector to dial it all in, and a small amount of sharpening. The results are stellar. Always feed this camera great glass, never just good enough glass... Use DXO ratings to see which lenses have the best sharpness ratings and this camera will resolve it for you. I paired the C100Mk2 with the Sigma Art 50mm 1.4 recently and a Rokinon 85mm cine lens and I see results that out weigh the lesser IQ of L Glass 16-35Mk2 very easily- because this 4K senor really does resolve all that the glass can and then some. I sold all the lenses that were mediocre, and look for lenses only that resolve into the 4K realm. I should mention 4K cameras are wonderful, and the ability to punch in is a plus, but with the C100Mk2 you can punch in as much as 25% without issue. The sound quality of the pre-amps is top notch, although a field recorder of over $650 will yield better results for backup, but I have connected the lapel mics directly into the camera and boom mics into recorders and vice versa and after equalization in post, I always seem to pick the C100 audio first because that's a huge plus when editing- its plain easier and it allows quicker turn over without sacrificing quality of sound. Will a sound devices resolve more information and better body? sure- but 99% time the pre-amps in this amazing work horse of a camera will yield fine results for any discerning audiophile. Always monitor your audio while recording and avoid over-modulation no matter the recorder. The not so good? the top handle- my least fav part of the camera, its always loose no matter how tight you make it without mods. I used three of these cameras and all suffer a slighly loose top handle- BAD CANON. But a simple fix such as a rubber band inside the shaft of the tightening screw will fix the issue and keep it tight without any play. I love how the camera can be stripped down and still used for 3-axis gimbals, I love how the battery lasts almost all day, I have all the sizes and always use the largest one for day shoots and never once has anyone of the camera's failed me. I will use other cameras as back ups when doing my work, BUT the pleasure and peace of mind knowing you captured everything right the first time on this workhorse of a camera is enough to just forget the hype and minimize files to a very workable size. After having this for a year, I would buy it again. I do understand the C200 or Mk3 is coming- as always improvements can be made- BUT how can you complain for improvements when file size and that magic synergy of canon color inside the camera shines through in such a small manageable file? BTW- I do use the ATMOS when I need 4:2:2 8 bit (some say its closer to 10bit in Prores HQ)- and by the way ONLY use that setting on the ATMOS other wise you are much better off with a AVCHD file from this camera- as I said it has the magic sauce for perfect image quality if properly exposed and color enhanced in premiere pro to yield optimum picture IQ. I see no benefit in external recorders for this and that is a real blessing also. Its good to have, but not really necessary as the image is so good after color correction (curves,fast color correct and sharpen). With that all said, and I do apologize for repeating- I would buy this again- and again. Even when the C200 comes out, this camera is a professional reliable camera that is ez to work with day in and day out. And the results are always pleasing to both the eye and the ears. What the heck else you want?
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
For $3999 the mk2 has improved noise reduction and color over the Mk1, plus has a much more usable eye cup which is more usable since it is extended (viewfinder) and better designed larger monitor display w/a higher def screen. The Mk2 utilizes the 4k chip better plus offers AVCHD and MP4 options for codec (only AVCHD offered in Mk1) - plus the mk2 has a built in mic in the body (the Mk1 has no built in mic in body- you have to use top handle for scratch audio which is stereo but makes camera much larger). The top handle offered in mk1 and mk2 are similar if not identical as far as I know. The picture profiles for Mk2 are much better to reduce noise. I use CinemaEX a custom profile among other profiles which are unique to the Mk2 and not really available for Mk1. I ... MoreFor $3999 the mk2 has improved noise reduction and color over the Mk1, plus has a much more usable eye cup which is more usable since it is extended (viewfinder) and better designed larger monitor display w/a higher def screen. The Mk2 utilizes the 4k chip better plus offers AVCHD and MP4 options for codec (only AVCHD offered in Mk1) - plus the mk2 has a built in mic in the body (the Mk1 has no built in mic in body- you have to use top handle for scratch audio which is stereo but makes camera much larger). The top handle offered in mk1 and mk2 are similar if not identical as far as I know. The picture profiles for Mk2 are much better to reduce noise. I use CinemaEX a custom profile among other profiles which are unique to the Mk2 and not really available for Mk1. I have to say, for the money its a great option- a work horse that will do fine video and audio in an all in one solution. Still the images off the FDR-AX100 are much more detailed BUT more camcorder like than that of the C100mk2 - If the FDR-AX100 is properly lit and a flat profile is used on the Sony it is much more detailed- I love the ability to punch in on 4K. Still the files are larger at 100mbps and the C100 looks very film like with no moire (ah thats another thing I forgot to mention the Mk1 has more Moire than the Mk2). The C100mk2 will not wow you with super awesome 4k detailed images that can be punched in, and sharpening is necessary since profiles on mk2 are generally devoid of massive color or detail which is squeezed into the small magical Canon file wrapper known as AVCHD at 28mbps (thats the best setting btw). AVCHD is vastly better than MP4 for audio too since audio is not compressed into a lossy codec (which MP4 does). MP4 may offer 35mbps but that does not mean better video or audio quality at all for video- its not as efficient as AVCHD in almost all regards. Also- some people noted more noticeable moire on mp4. Remember this is a native 8 bit camera and designed to be ez to use ready to edit files. As far as I can tell from tests I have done and seen on line- there is no benefit what so ever in getting an outside recorder such as the ATMOS recorder unless someone/a job calls for 4:2:2 PRORES HQ color space. Any other ProRes settings on any recorder other than ProRes HQ (220 Mbps) will look even worse than the AVCHD at 28mbps. Note: some ppl say the color space goes from 8 bits to 10bits- its under debate- even IF somehow it goes from true 8bits to10 bits so some say- the pier papers from Canon do not support this but some did report it does in fact do record a true10bits from the original 8bit color space- tons of videos show the AVCHD is eziest and smallest files and actually reduces noise better than a external recorder such as ATMOS since the AVCHD has noise reduction built in while the HDMI out omits such NR- (BUT the noise that some may note with ATMOS fixes ezier in post if a noise reduction program is used some say) Thee codec in the AVCHD does color magic and retains a huge amount of color details and sharpness that needs to be developed in post. The small file sizes are the C100mk2 biggest asset. Its just a real video camera that makes editing a breeze since no outside recorder is necessary really. The use of a high quality external recorder does offer more dynamic range and slightly quieter but still- that's comparing it to a $600 Tascam Dr-701D. Most people wont ever care or hear the difference. I can use the C100mk2 up to 16,000 ISO without noise if the EV is set to +1. That's the key to getting best image always set the EV to +1 on ur HUD screen. If you shoot an under-developed image and the EV is 0 or less, tons of noise sets in in dark areas. I recently wrote on a fb page for owners of C100mk2 - one bit of advice- always always always over expose to +1 and your noise will be minimized with C100mk2 - don't be afraid of using higher ISO to get there if you need too... your video will look cleaner if you always +1 on the meter on screen - See pic attached
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I used to use C100's when I was in film school, so when it was time to upgrade our church's video production I knew exactly what camera I'd be looking at.An affordable entry into cinema cameras that gives you an excellent dynamic range and the typical Canon color profile. After going a couple of years without using this camera and having used 70 and 80D's for most of our video production, I had forgotten just how good it was. I was blown away when shots that normally would have been under-exposed in the 80D came out with the wide spectrum of dynamic range from the whites to the blacks without losing an ounce of information. Crisp, clean, and beautiful. It has been a joy to use. Also still light to enough to use flexibly and still works on most rigs that we we were ... MoreI used to use C100's when I was in film school, so when it was time to upgrade our church's video production I knew exactly what camera I'd be looking at.An affordable entry into cinema cameras that gives you an excellent dynamic range and the typical Canon color profile. After going a couple of years without using this camera and having used 70 and 80D's for most of our video production, I had forgotten just how good it was. I was blown away when shots that normally would have been under-exposed in the 80D came out with the wide spectrum of dynamic range from the whites to the blacks without losing an ounce of information. Crisp, clean, and beautiful. It has been a joy to use. Also still light to enough to use flexibly and still works on most rigs that we we were using with our 80D.The lens is a shockingly good lens for a kit, that gives a nice range of zoom with a f2.8 all the way through it, instead of the cheap lenses that limit aperture the tighter you get. Really great all around lens for what we needed it for.
Canon EOS C100 Mark II Camera Camcorder - Black
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Canon EOS C100 Mark II Body with Dual Pixel CMOS AF
Delivery $141.83
Canon EOS C100 Mark II Cinema EOS Camera with Dual Pixel CMOS AF (Body Only) (Import)
I have to say of all the camera's I have used, this is a logical step for people who use $15K cameras who want to minimize load and file size while still staying 100% professional... and it's a logical step up for people using DSLR or mirrorless cameras who are tired of limitations and set up issues. The camera is a work horse- reliability is key. I have filmed long interviews with the CIA, FBI, NSA, NIST and DEA whistleblower agents- the work I do can not stand for flimsy build quality or overly complicated codecs. I will say, exposure is everything, and feeding proper exposure to the AVCHD codec results in noise free images. I use custom profiles such as CinemaEX - always, I did my research as you should do for Custom Profiles. I recommend that anyone always ... MoreI have to say of all the camera's I have used, this is a logical step for people who use $15K cameras who want to minimize load and file size while still staying 100% professional... and it's a logical step up for people using DSLR or mirrorless cameras who are tired of limitations and set up issues. The camera is a work horse- reliability is key. I have filmed long interviews with the CIA, FBI, NSA, NIST and DEA whistleblower agents- the work I do can not stand for flimsy build quality or overly complicated codecs. I will say, exposure is everything, and feeding proper exposure to the AVCHD codec results in noise free images. I use custom profiles such as CinemaEX - always, I did my research as you should do for Custom Profiles. I recommend that anyone always overexpose +1 or more - use your histogram for proper exposure and you will have noise free moire free images that will jump out off the screen like a 3-d image. I do small adjustments in Premiere Pro CS6 with slight RGB s curve, use fast color corrector to dial it all in, and a small amount of sharpening. The results are stellar. Always feed this camera great glass, never just good enough glass... Use DXO ratings to see which lenses have the best sharpness ratings and this camera will resolve it for you. I paired the C100Mk2 with the Sigma Art 50mm 1.4 recently and a Rokinon 85mm cine lens and I see results that out weigh the lesser IQ of L Glass 16-35Mk2 very easily- because this 4K senor really does resolve all that the glass can and then some. I sold all the lenses that were mediocre, and look for lenses only that resolve into the 4K realm. I should mention 4K cameras are wonderful, and the ability to punch in is a plus, but with the C100Mk2 you can punch in as much as 25% without issue. The sound quality of the pre-amps is top notch, although a field recorder of over $650 will yield better results for backup, but I have connected the lapel mics directly into the camera and boom mics into recorders and vice versa and after equalization in post, I always seem to pick the C100 audio first because that's a huge plus when editing- its plain easier and it allows quicker turn over without sacrificing quality of sound. Will a sound devices resolve more information and better body? sure- but 99% time the pre-amps in this amazing work horse of a camera will yield fine results for any discerning audiophile. Always monitor your audio while recording and avoid over-modulation no matter the recorder. The not so good? the top handle- my least fav part of the camera, its always loose no matter how tight you make it without mods. I used three of these cameras and all suffer a slighly loose top handle- BAD CANON. But a simple fix such as a rubber band inside the shaft of the tightening screw will fix the issue and keep it tight without any play. I love how the camera can be stripped down and still used for 3-axis gimbals, I love how the battery lasts almost all day, I have all the sizes and always use the largest one for day shoots and never once has anyone of the camera's failed me. I will use other cameras as back ups when doing my work, BUT the pleasure and peace of mind knowing you captured everything right the first time on this workhorse of a camera is enough to just forget the hype and minimize files to a very workable size. After having this for a year, I would buy it again. I do understand the C200 or Mk3 is coming- as always improvements can be made- BUT how can you complain for improvements when file size and that magic synergy of canon color inside the camera shines through in such a small manageable file? BTW- I do use the ATMOS when I need 4:2:2 8 bit (some say its closer to 10bit in Prores HQ)- and by the way ONLY use that setting on the ATMOS other wise you are much better off with a AVCHD file from this camera- as I said it has the magic sauce for perfect image quality if properly exposed and color enhanced in premiere pro to yield optimum picture IQ. I see no benefit in external recorders for this and that is a real blessing also. Its good to have, but not really necessary as the image is so good after color correction (curves,fast color correct and sharpen). With that all said, and I do apologize for repeating- I would buy this again- and again. Even when the C200 comes out, this camera is a professional reliable camera that is ez to work with day in and day out. And the results are always pleasing to both the eye and the ears. What the heck else you want?
For $3999 the mk2 has improved noise reduction and color over the Mk1, plus has a much more usable eye cup which is more usable since it is extended (viewfinder) and better designed larger monitor display w/a higher def screen. The Mk2 utilizes the 4k chip better plus offers AVCHD and MP4 options for codec (only AVCHD offered in Mk1) - plus the mk2 has a built in mic in the body (the Mk1 has no built in mic in body- you have to use top handle for scratch audio which is stereo but makes camera much larger). The top handle offered in mk1 and mk2 are similar if not identical as far as I know. The picture profiles for Mk2 are much better to reduce noise. I use CinemaEX a custom profile among other profiles which are unique to the Mk2 and not really available for Mk1. I ... MoreFor $3999 the mk2 has improved noise reduction and color over the Mk1, plus has a much more usable eye cup which is more usable since it is extended (viewfinder) and better designed larger monitor display w/a higher def screen. The Mk2 utilizes the 4k chip better plus offers AVCHD and MP4 options for codec (only AVCHD offered in Mk1) - plus the mk2 has a built in mic in the body (the Mk1 has no built in mic in body- you have to use top handle for scratch audio which is stereo but makes camera much larger). The top handle offered in mk1 and mk2 are similar if not identical as far as I know. The picture profiles for Mk2 are much better to reduce noise. I use CinemaEX a custom profile among other profiles which are unique to the Mk2 and not really available for Mk1. I have to say, for the money its a great option- a work horse that will do fine video and audio in an all in one solution. Still the images off the FDR-AX100 are much more detailed BUT more camcorder like than that of the C100mk2 - If the FDR-AX100 is properly lit and a flat profile is used on the Sony it is much more detailed- I love the ability to punch in on 4K. Still the files are larger at 100mbps and the C100 looks very film like with no moire (ah thats another thing I forgot to mention the Mk1 has more Moire than the Mk2). The C100mk2 will not wow you with super awesome 4k detailed images that can be punched in, and sharpening is necessary since profiles on mk2 are generally devoid of massive color or detail which is squeezed into the small magical Canon file wrapper known as AVCHD at 28mbps (thats the best setting btw). AVCHD is vastly better than MP4 for audio too since audio is not compressed into a lossy codec (which MP4 does). MP4 may offer 35mbps but that does not mean better video or audio quality at all for video- its not as efficient as AVCHD in almost all regards. Also- some people noted more noticeable moire on mp4. Remember this is a native 8 bit camera and designed to be ez to use ready to edit files. As far as I can tell from tests I have done and seen on line- there is no benefit what so ever in getting an outside recorder such as the ATMOS recorder unless someone/a job calls for 4:2:2 PRORES HQ color space. Any other ProRes settings on any recorder other than ProRes HQ (220 Mbps) will look even worse than the AVCHD at 28mbps. Note: some ppl say the color space goes from 8 bits to 10bits- its under debate- even IF somehow it goes from true 8bits to10 bits so some say- the pier papers from Canon do not support this but some did report it does in fact do record a true10bits from the original 8bit color space- tons of videos show the AVCHD is eziest and smallest files and actually reduces noise better than a external recorder such as ATMOS since the AVCHD has noise reduction built in while the HDMI out omits such NR- (BUT the noise that some may note with ATMOS fixes ezier in post if a noise reduction program is used some say) Thee codec in the AVCHD does color magic and retains a huge amount of color details and sharpness that needs to be developed in post. The small file sizes are the C100mk2 biggest asset. Its just a real video camera that makes editing a breeze since no outside recorder is necessary really. The use of a high quality external recorder does offer more dynamic range and slightly quieter but still- that's comparing it to a $600 Tascam Dr-701D. Most people wont ever care or hear the difference. I can use the C100mk2 up to 16,000 ISO without noise if the EV is set to +1. That's the key to getting best image always set the EV to +1 on ur HUD screen. If you shoot an under-developed image and the EV is 0 or less, tons of noise sets in in dark areas. I recently wrote on a fb page for owners of C100mk2 - one bit of advice- always always always over expose to +1 and your noise will be minimized with C100mk2 - don't be afraid of using higher ISO to get there if you need too... your video will look cleaner if you always +1 on the meter on screen - See pic attached
I used to use C100's when I was in film school, so when it was time to upgrade our church's video production I knew exactly what camera I'd be looking at.An affordable entry into cinema cameras that gives you an excellent dynamic range and the typical Canon color profile. After going a couple of years without using this camera and having used 70 and 80D's for most of our video production, I had forgotten just how good it was. I was blown away when shots that normally would have been under-exposed in the 80D came out with the wide spectrum of dynamic range from the whites to the blacks without losing an ounce of information. Crisp, clean, and beautiful. It has been a joy to use. Also still light to enough to use flexibly and still works on most rigs that we we were ... MoreI used to use C100's when I was in film school, so when it was time to upgrade our church's video production I knew exactly what camera I'd be looking at.An affordable entry into cinema cameras that gives you an excellent dynamic range and the typical Canon color profile. After going a couple of years without using this camera and having used 70 and 80D's for most of our video production, I had forgotten just how good it was. I was blown away when shots that normally would have been under-exposed in the 80D came out with the wide spectrum of dynamic range from the whites to the blacks without losing an ounce of information. Crisp, clean, and beautiful. It has been a joy to use. Also still light to enough to use flexibly and still works on most rigs that we we were using with our 80D.The lens is a shockingly good lens for a kit, that gives a nice range of zoom with a f2.8 all the way through it, instead of the cheap lenses that limit aperture the tighter you get. Really great all around lens for what we needed it for.
I worked as a producer for the Smithsonian and had access to some decent cameras before. I never, however, owned my own camera so I considered my budget and my options. Most importantly, I considered what I wanted to do with my videos. The C100 Mark II was the best choice! the quality of the video is great (since I'll be using it for web delivery), the learning curve is not very steep, and the option of working with high quality canon lenses is priceless. The camera is 6 years old and I am glad I did not pay 5500 (its original price). I grab one because I suspect it will become one of those very sought-after items very soon.
It's almost 2021 and I just bought a Canon C100 mark ii. Yes, there are other fantastic cameras out on the market. Yes, the specs of those cameras outperform the 8 bit, HD codec this camera only shoots. This is an outstanding camera for my needs: which are I am a one man band, who moves around from location to location, who does corporate work, greenscreen work, and the occasional wedding or two. Most of my content is delivered on the web, and the greenscreen work is done with a Blackmagic Video Assist, as I am able to record 422. Albeit only 8 bit. Still, I looked at the higher-end cameras. The fact that this camera has dual XLR inputs, ND filters, a simple, easy to use form factor, plus the ability to use cheap media. The battery life is fantastic. I don't feel ... MoreIt's almost 2021 and I just bought a Canon C100 mark ii. Yes, there are other fantastic cameras out on the market. Yes, the specs of those cameras outperform the 8 bit, HD codec this camera only shoots. This is an outstanding camera for my needs: which are I am a one man band, who moves around from location to location, who does corporate work, greenscreen work, and the occasional wedding or two. Most of my content is delivered on the web, and the greenscreen work is done with a Blackmagic Video Assist, as I am able to record 422. Albeit only 8 bit. Still, I looked at the higher-end cameras. The fact that this camera has dual XLR inputs, ND filters, a simple, easy to use form factor, plus the ability to use cheap media. The battery life is fantastic. I don't feel like switching out batteries all the time on mirrorless cameras. Nor do I have to worry about any overheating.If you need 4K, then this camera isn't for you. Keep in mind though this is a 4K sensor downsampled to a Super 35 image. Ask yourself: how many requests have you gotten to deliver 4K footage?This camera is fantastic and will suite my needs for the next 2-3 years.
I moved from a EOS 7D camera to the Canon EOS C100 Mark II and I'm quite impressed. I was hoping to achieve a more cinematic look with my shoots and all the features live up to the hype. It's very easy to learn and use. The controls are so much more convenient to use in real-time than my previous camera, and I was very surprised at how steady it is when using the side hand grip alone. It may be that it's a good bit heavier than my 7D, but it's remarkably stable and more comfortable.The auto-zoom button is great to quickly check for focus without interrupting a shoot. With just a small display screen that can wash out on a bright day, I was often shooting blind with the 7D and relying completely on auto focus that would often fail. The EV resolves that issue. The ... MoreI moved from a EOS 7D camera to the Canon EOS C100 Mark II and I'm quite impressed. I was hoping to achieve a more cinematic look with my shoots and all the features live up to the hype. It's very easy to learn and use. The controls are so much more convenient to use in real-time than my previous camera, and I was very surprised at how steady it is when using the side hand grip alone. It may be that it's a good bit heavier than my 7D, but it's remarkably stable and more comfortable.The auto-zoom button is great to quickly check for focus without interrupting a shoot. With just a small display screen that can wash out on a bright day, I was often shooting blind with the 7D and relying completely on auto focus that would often fail. The EV resolves that issue. The built in light filters are also amazing so you have more control with the camera's settings when outdoors.Besides the full range of functions at your fingertips, the picture quality is gorgeous and it picks up very subtle tones. I added two screen captures to show the difference between this camera and the 7D that struggled to pull in enough light in the same location. The contrast alone is far less pleasing than what the C100 captures. These images are both right out of the camera without any color editing. This was also my first shoot with the C100 and although I was still getting comfortable with the controls, I was able to keep up with the live action as it was happening.I could go on but I would just be repeating the sales pitch you can find anywhere. You can certainly believe what you hear about this camera.
I bought this camera as a match to one that I already have. I now have one camera for each of my two photographic endeavors, i.e., one for bird and wildlife photos (I use a 400 zoom lens for this) and landscape photography ( I use a 135 zoom lens for this). In the field this means I do not have to change lens every time a different opportunity presents itself. By not having to change lenses so often it lowers the chances of getting dust on my camera mirrors. The camera has a low shutter action count meaning the camera is almost like new. Excellent camera.
I am a cinematographer that has shot pretty much everything (features, music videos, docs, corporate) For my higher end cinematic 4k productions I use my BMD Ursa Mini Pro 4.6k paired with the Pocket 4k and record BRAW. But for all my 1080p deliverables, there is no better camera out there than the C100 MKII HANDS DOWN. It's just perfect. It's light, cheap media, shoots 60p, excellent in low light and you can even dial in color correction IN CAMERA. The autofocus is great too. I have owned several cameras in my production life, none have stayed relevant and enduring as my C100 MKII. As a person who has 5 years with this camera, ignore the naysayers. This camera is a reliable, proven workhorse.
Have been using the original C100 for about 5 years. Also have owned and used 5 different Canon DSLR models up through the 5D MkIV, along with 4 L Series lenses and 3 STM lenses. The first C100 was and still is an honest little workhorse. The features added in the C100 MkII are excellent and bring the camera up to modern standards.As the son of a photographer who made his living in photography, I have been shooting for over 50 years. I grew up in a lab and studio and only began to understand the countless lessons my father taught me about photography in the last couple of decades. For the last 20 years or so (yes, I am getting up there in years) photography and video has been part of what I did to make a living.As for the C100 MkII, the most useful features are ... MoreHave been using the original C100 for about 5 years. Also have owned and used 5 different Canon DSLR models up through the 5D MkIV, along with 4 L Series lenses and 3 STM lenses. The first C100 was and still is an honest little workhorse. The features added in the C100 MkII are excellent and bring the camera up to modern standards.As the son of a photographer who made his living in photography, I have been shooting for over 50 years. I grew up in a lab and studio and only began to understand the countless lessons my father taught me about photography in the last couple of decades. For the last 20 years or so (yes, I am getting up there in years) photography and video has been part of what I did to make a living.As for the C100 MkII, the most useful features are the dual Codecs and 60P functionality. The viewfinder, LCD and control interface are all much improved over the previous model. Yes, it's only 2K, but most of my world is not yet completely ready for 4K yet. The higher bitrates allow a fair amount of cropping and sharpening in post, and the image is very acceptable, especially compared to poorly done 4K (e.g. lower cost drones and video cameras). The wide dynamic range and cinema modes provide all the dynamic range needed for shooting in direct sunlight.I use the C100 MkII with an Atomos Shogun Inferno recorder both mounted on a larger Manfrotto tripod with fluid head, and tethered remotely via high speed HDMI cables allowing the talent to start and stop the recording and view themselves. The ability to record what appears to be the same image quality to the internal SD cards is a big plus. Have not done in-depth comparisons, but It's awfully close, and I only use the cards for hand held shooting (mostly family stuff).Ergonomics? Everything you need to adjust while shooting is right there, with knobs and buttons right where they belong.I was looking at 4K cameras before buying the C100 MkII, but could not find anything that checked all the boxes. I did not want a large camera that I could not carry around for a couple hours without suffering joint damage, not to mention the cost. The C200 looked pretty cool, but does not export the max quality to an external recorder, and I was not wild about having to buy expensive CFast cards. The EVA1 also looked cool, but it doesn't even have auto focus. Are they kidding? Canon has auto focus down, period. No other brands come close. Yes, I do use the auto focus a lot, because it works so well.I wish the DSLRs had a waveform monitor. What a wonderful tool for exposure. The center spot metering allows a quick range reading of the shadows and highlights.Enough of my blabbering. The Canon C100 MkII is the best camera in its price range, and even a bit higher price range, than anything else I could find. The color fidelity, shooting options and low light sensitivity are simply great. Add to all that, it's tough enough to easily handle a lot of outdoor shooting in not so good conditions.Yes, I am extremely happy with this camera.Best regards and happy shooting!
I've had the C100 Mark II for two years and it's the best camera I've ever used. Never had a single software glitch or hardware malfunction. I own a C200, and while it's superior when shooting high-end 12-bit and 4K projects, the C100 Mark II is a far more user-friendly and reliable camera. If Canon had simply updated the recording specs of the C100 Mark II, I'd say it's a better story-telling tool than either the C200, and here's why: 1. C100 Mark II is light enough that you can operate it handheld with a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 MK II without a shoulder rig for long periods of time. The C200 is light enough for quick handheld pops without a rig on the 24-70, but it's too heavy to operate it without a shoulder rig for long periods of time. 2. The C100 Mark II's monitor ... MoreI've had the C100 Mark II for two years and it's the best camera I've ever used. Never had a single software glitch or hardware malfunction. I own a C200, and while it's superior when shooting high-end 12-bit and 4K projects, the C100 Mark II is a far more user-friendly and reliable camera. If Canon had simply updated the recording specs of the C100 Mark II, I'd say it's a better story-telling tool than either the C200, and here's why: 1. C100 Mark II is light enough that you can operate it handheld with a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 MK II without a shoulder rig for long periods of time. The C200 is light enough for quick handheld pops without a rig on the 24-70, but it's too heavy to operate it without a shoulder rig for long periods of time. 2. The C100 Mark II's monitor is attached to the body, making it lightning fast to set-up and break-down from and to its smallest size. 3. ***THE C100 MARK II'S SET BUTTON ON THE JOYSTICK ACTS AS A FUNCTION BUTTON, ENABLING YOU TO RAPIDLY CHANGE THE CAMERA'S EXPOSURE AND WHITE BALANCE SETTINGS. YOU CANNOT DO THIS WITH THE C200; YOU MUST PRESS THE FUNC BUTTON FIRST, OR USE THE BUTTONS ON THE BODY, OR REROUTE THE GRIP'S SINGLE CUSTOM BUTTON TO ACT AS A FUNC BUTTON. I CANNOT FIGURE OUT WHY CANON HAS DISABLED THE SET AS FUNC BUTTON ON ITS HIGHER END CAMERAS. IT SIGNIFICANTLY SLOWS DOWN THE SHOOTING PROCESS ON RUN-N-GUN SHOOTS. For this seemingly minor detail, the C100 Mark II is a far superior STORY TELLING TOOL than the C200, because it functions better under fire. 4. The menu system on the C100 Mark II is faster than that of the C200, again, making it a more effective STORY TELLING TOOL UNDER FIRE. 5. The C100 Mark II has internal, super-sharp 60FPS slow-and-fast mode slow motion recording, whereas the C200 ONLY has so-soft-it's-barely-usable 120FPS slow-and-fast slow motion recording. 120FPS is nice for sports and highly dramatic moments, but 60FPS is more suitable for most other slow motion scenarios. 6. The C100 Mark II can output the LUT via HDMI. The C200 can't, for reasons unbeknownst to man. SmallHD 501 users should take special consideration of this. 7. You can remove the XLR inputs from the C100 Mark II, making it ultra light-weight. This is helpful in handheld mode, on gimbals and Glidecam and when using sliders. The XLRs are fixed to the C200, marrying that extra weight to the body. If a firmware update came out updating the C100 Mark II's recording specs to 10-bit 422 4K, I would sell my C200 immediately. The C200 has better specs and admittedly a better image with the dual DIGIC 6 image processors, but the EXCELLENT functionality of the C100 Mark II, in my opinion, makes it a much better STORY TELLING TOOL. If you prioritize TELLING GOOD STORIES over owning the best specs, strongly consider the C100 Mark II over the C200 and use that boat-load of money saved to buy whatever else you need to get your kit started (unless you really need 4K, in which case absolutely buy the C200). 8.
