Davids Whitening Toothpaste Peppermint 149 g

I tried this toothpaste on a whim. I have sensitivity to fluoride and have to be careful with it or I get a rash. Non-fluoride toothpaste are normally disgusting. This toothpaste is the solution I have been looking for for years. It taste delish, doesn’t have a weird texture, and tastes so yummy! I’m also a sucker for packaging and I really like the design and the cute little key that it comes with it to roll the tube down as you use it.I am officially a fan and will be a returning customer! If you were on the fence about this product, I can safely say that it is worth trying it. It is really great.

I had missed my regular scheduled dentist appointment and procrastinated on rescheduling. Ended up being 1 1/2 before I got back in for a cleaning. Dentist said she couldn't believe that it had been that long since I'd had a cleaning. Took me a while to get used to the taste after using the run of the mill tooth paste all my life. Hubbs still won't use it but both my boys do with no complaints. Also notice that my breath is way better and I don't get tonsil stones anymore. Had tab out and within a months time noticed bad breath returned as well as the tonsil stones.

Buyer beware! David's Sensitive Whitening Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste is playing fast and loose with their customers' trust, and it's time to shed light on their shoddy practices. I recently reached out to David's, requesting information about the percentage of nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HA) in their toothpaste, as my dentist recommended a minimum of 7%. To my dismay, they flatly refused to disclose this information, claiming it was "proprietary."Here's the problem: toothpaste, especially those that claim to be beneficial for dental health, should be upfront about their active ingredients. David's dodgy response only raises red flags. Their so-called "proprietary" formulation is nothing more than a smokescreen to obscure what is likely a subpar product.It's ... MoreBuyer beware! David's Sensitive Whitening Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste is playing fast and loose with their customers' trust, and it's time to shed light on their shoddy practices. I recently reached out to David's, requesting information about the percentage of nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HA) in their toothpaste, as my dentist recommended a minimum of 7%. To my dismay, they flatly refused to disclose this information, claiming it was "proprietary."Here's the problem: toothpaste, especially those that claim to be beneficial for dental health, should be upfront about their active ingredients. David's dodgy response only raises red flags. Their so-called "proprietary" formulation is nothing more than a smokescreen to obscure what is likely a subpar product.It's noteworthy that David's admits a toothpaste with 10% hydroxyapatite can be more effective, yet they stop short of confirming they meet this standard. This gives the impression that their formulation falls short of the recommended concentration, and they're using evasive tactics to avoid this inconvenient truth.Worse still, David's is positioning itself as an alternative to fluoride toothpastes, which are scientifically proven to reduce cavities and must disclose their fluoride concentrations by law. This insinuation seems calculated to take advantage of consumers seeking fluoride-free options. But, by failing to be transparent about their nano-HA concentration, they're flouting the principles of transparency that keep consumers safe and informed.To add insult to injury, David's mentions a third-party lab test in their favor, yet they neglect to provide any meaningful data, including the lab's name, the methods used, or a comprehensive report of their findings. This is not evidence; it's a marketing ploy. Their vagueness raises serious questions about the test's legitimacy and the toothpaste's effectiveness.Contrast David's approach with Apagard, a brand that openly declares its nano-HA concentration. This kind of transparency fosters trust, something David's evidently lacks. We must not let David's exploit those wary of fluoride and looking for alternatives. This isn't just a matter of ineffective toothpaste; it's about the harm that can come from opaque and misleading advertising.Let's vote with our wallets and reject such deceptive practices. I've returned my David's toothpaste and have reported them to the Better Business Bureau. I urge you to do the same if you've had similar experiences. It's high time that companies like David's realize that consumer trust can't be won with evasiveness and predatory tactics, but with honesty and transparency. Let's demand better!