Kodak Ultra Max 400 135/36 3-pack
Kodak Ultramax 400 is a medium speed, high quality colour film. It has an excellent range in colour, vibrant saturation and fares well in bright and dim light. It's 400 ISO means it has a fair amount of grain but it's a high quality film stock meaning it can be pushed or pulled to the user's needs. Each pack contains three rolls of film with 36 exposures each. Good for all types of shooting conditions.nnBrand new in boxes with an expiry of 10/24.
Kodak Ultramax 400 is a medium speed, high quality colour film. It has an excellent range in colour, vibrant saturation and fares well in bright and dim light. It's 400 ISO means it has a fair amount of grain but it's a high quality film stock meaning it can be pushed or pulled to the user's needs. Each pack contains three rolls of film with 36 exposures each. Good for all types of shooting conditions.nnBrand new in boxes with an expiry of 10/24.
Kodak Ultramax 400 is a medium speed, high quality colour film. It has an excellent range in colour, vibrant saturation and fares well in bright and dim light. It's 400 ISO means it has a fair amount of grain but it's a high quality film stock meaning it can be pushed or pulled to the user's needs. Each pack contains three rolls of film with 36 exposures each. Good for all types of shooting conditions.nnBrand new in boxes with an expiry of 10/24.
Kodak Ultramax 400 is a medium speed, high quality colour film. It has an excellent range in colour, vibrant saturation and fares well in bright and dim light. It's 400 ISO means it has a fair amount of grain but it's a high quality film stock meaning it can be pushed or pulled to the user's needs. Each pack contains three rolls of film with 36 exposures each. Good for all types of shooting conditions.nnBrand new in boxes with an expiry of 10/24.
in 9 offers
The lowest price for Kodak Ultra Max 400 135/36 3-pack right now is $21.95 at Everyday Rewards, compared across 8 retailers.
The all-time low was $15.36 on 18 Mar 2026 — today's price is 43% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 20 June 2026.
Last updated at 20/06/2026 21:49:55
Kodak Ultramax 400 135 36 exp X3
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak GC135-36 400 Film
Delivery between Wed – Sat $10
Kodak Ultramax 400 35mm (1 x Pack of 3 24exp, 3 rolls)
Delivery $10.95
Kodak 1x3 Kodak Ultra max 400 135/36
Free delivery
Kodak Ultramax 400 35mm Color Negative Film 36 Exposures 3-Pack
Delivery $11.54
Kodak Ultramax 400 35mm Color Negative Film 36 Exposures 3-Pack
Delivery $11.51
Ultra Max 400 135/36 High-Performance 35mm Color Film
Free delivery between 30 June – 3 July
Kodak UltraMax 400 New Color Printing 135-36 35mm Film 36 Exposures 1/2/3/5/10 Roll Kodak Film Photo
Free delivery between 29 June – 3 July
Kodak UltraMax 400 35mm Color Negative Film (36 Exposures) - Fresh Stock 08/2028
Delivery $35.05
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
I've got mixed feelings about this one. Its often called an all rounder but really its not. I wouldn't recommend this for strong, sunny light because it tends to pump up the colours so that they become really overpowering. Its quite a grainy film as well, so that makes for bad combination. Its not a subtle film at all, choosing to drill into your eyes out rather than evoke an atmosphere or feeling. Where it really comes into own though is in dull light and in ye olden dayes 400 was considered a fast film not a standard film, to be used in winter, or cloudy or shadowed light. That's when this film really helps you, with contrast on those flat days, and picking out colour that tends to otherwise blend into the surroundings, making it really pop, as well as giving you ... MoreI've got mixed feelings about this one. Its often called an all rounder but really its not. I wouldn't recommend this for strong, sunny light because it tends to pump up the colours so that they become really overpowering. Its quite a grainy film as well, so that makes for bad combination. Its not a subtle film at all, choosing to drill into your eyes out rather than evoke an atmosphere or feeling. Where it really comes into own though is in dull light and in ye olden dayes 400 was considered a fast film not a standard film, to be used in winter, or cloudy or shadowed light. That's when this film really helps you, with contrast on those flat days, and picking out colour that tends to otherwise blend into the surroundings, making it really pop, as well as giving you that all important speed and aperture option. Wil I buy it again? Absolutely. In our cloudy climate when January comes round and you despair of taking photos, this makes it possible and rather lovely.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
Have been doing photography for about 7 years now and have always loved the nostalgic look of film. By chance I was recently given a Pentax K1000 35mm camera and so needed some film. Kodak Ultramax seemed like a good entry price point and film speed, so opted for that. I’m really happy with the images I got back. It has a nice amount of grain that adds that filmic quality but is does produce quite a cool colour temperature, so a slight blue cast even on warm, sunny days. I would buy this film again but as a film newbie, I have many more to try first!
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
I’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re ... MoreI’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re careful breaking the rules. It’s really great for high contrast between shadow and light and indoor natural light.I will definitely use Ultramax again but probably a 100 or 200 next time with this camera. 400 will remain my default on my more versatile SLRs.
| Assembly required | No |
| Batteries required | No |
| Film colour | Color |
| Film format type | 135 |
| Exposures per roll | 36 |
Kodak Ultramax 400 135 36 exp X3
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak GC135-36 400 Film
Delivery between Wed – Sat $10
Kodak Ultramax 400 35mm (1 x Pack of 3 24exp, 3 rolls)
Delivery $10.95
Kodak 1x3 Kodak Ultra max 400 135/36
Free delivery
Kodak Ultramax 400 35mm Color Negative Film 36 Exposures 3-Pack
Delivery $11.54
I've got mixed feelings about this one. Its often called an all rounder but really its not. I wouldn't recommend this for strong, sunny light because it tends to pump up the colours so that they become really overpowering. Its quite a grainy film as well, so that makes for bad combination. Its not a subtle film at all, choosing to drill into your eyes out rather than evoke an atmosphere or feeling. Where it really comes into own though is in dull light and in ye olden dayes 400 was considered a fast film not a standard film, to be used in winter, or cloudy or shadowed light. That's when this film really helps you, with contrast on those flat days, and picking out colour that tends to otherwise blend into the surroundings, making it really pop, as well as giving you ... MoreI've got mixed feelings about this one. Its often called an all rounder but really its not. I wouldn't recommend this for strong, sunny light because it tends to pump up the colours so that they become really overpowering. Its quite a grainy film as well, so that makes for bad combination. Its not a subtle film at all, choosing to drill into your eyes out rather than evoke an atmosphere or feeling. Where it really comes into own though is in dull light and in ye olden dayes 400 was considered a fast film not a standard film, to be used in winter, or cloudy or shadowed light. That's when this film really helps you, with contrast on those flat days, and picking out colour that tends to otherwise blend into the surroundings, making it really pop, as well as giving you that all important speed and aperture option. Wil I buy it again? Absolutely. In our cloudy climate when January comes round and you despair of taking photos, this makes it possible and rather lovely.
Have been doing photography for about 7 years now and have always loved the nostalgic look of film. By chance I was recently given a Pentax K1000 35mm camera and so needed some film. Kodak Ultramax seemed like a good entry price point and film speed, so opted for that. I’m really happy with the images I got back. It has a nice amount of grain that adds that filmic quality but is does produce quite a cool colour temperature, so a slight blue cast even on warm, sunny days. I would buy this film again but as a film newbie, I have many more to try first!
I’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re ... MoreI’ve just started using film again after a long gap.25 years ago I invariably used 400 film - I’ve never liked flash and it was great for doing low light shadowy and indoor shots. So when I bought a 60 year old Agfa Super Silette on EBay I used a 400 film to test it without really thinking it through. I also had to use a light meter, something I’ve never had to do with any of the cameras I’ve used in the past. Inevitably I made a lot of mistakes.Anyway, all wasn’t lost. I’ve proved the camera works well (I’m not convinced about the light meter which appears to have died now). Where I got it right (for me) the colours were spot on and I was really pleased with the results.I do like my woodland shots taken into the sun. This is achievable with this film if you’re careful breaking the rules. It’s really great for high contrast between shadow and light and indoor natural light.I will definitely use Ultramax again but probably a 100 or 200 next time with this camera. 400 will remain my default on my more versatile SLRs.
It's kodak so it's got good colours. I prefer shooting this to portra because it's cheaper and so I don't end up overthinking it. It's 400 so it's suited to British weather is my figuring on it. I think I've accidentally shot at 200 and 100 and still got okay frames, so it's forgiving. It's a great, forgiving film for beginners and learning. I'd use it anywhere for anything if I could, I'm guessing it's just Gold 400 rebadged but I don't know. I've always leaned towards 400.
UltraMax is sort of a middle child, sitting between Kodak's cheaper colour-negative offerings (ColorPlus and Gold) and the high-end varieties (Ektar and Portra). But precisely for that reason, it has something to offer the film photographer who is looking for more subtle shades and colour reproduction, or simply for faster speeds without shelling out for Portra 400.I've used UltraMax for street photography in Japan, and I really like the results. ISO 400 in my book is the most versatile film speed, which makes UltraMax particularly well-suited as a travel film. In bright sunlight the colours can be a little "cold" for my liking (closer to Fuji than Kodak films which typically have warmer colours), but in the shade or on cloudy days it really shines. Under tungsten ... MoreUltraMax is sort of a middle child, sitting between Kodak's cheaper colour-negative offerings (ColorPlus and Gold) and the high-end varieties (Ektar and Portra). But precisely for that reason, it has something to offer the film photographer who is looking for more subtle shades and colour reproduction, or simply for faster speeds without shelling out for Portra 400.I've used UltraMax for street photography in Japan, and I really like the results. ISO 400 in my book is the most versatile film speed, which makes UltraMax particularly well-suited as a travel film. In bright sunlight the colours can be a little "cold" for my liking (closer to Fuji than Kodak films which typically have warmer colours), but in the shade or on cloudy days it really shines. Under tungsten light (as you can see in one of my sample photos) it exhibits strong colour cast (which all daylight-balanced films do, but UltraMax seems to cope particularly badly), so my recommendation would be to stick to natural light.(Sample photos shot on a Minolta SLR, developed and scanned by a professional lab)
My go-to budget colour film!A decent grain (do remember it's a 400 ISO film so won't be as clear as a lower ISO), surprisingly true to life colours and reasonable price makes it a no-brainer to shoot.It's surprisingly forgiving and is versatile enough to be shot in varying lights from bright day to late evening and even some indoor stuff.The colour sits slightly on the cool side and can make skin tones look a little ghostly so is not wise to use for portraits but works superbly well for street photography, especially in the UK where a lot of historical buildings are beige, black and white.Love it!
My first time using an older film camera (Yashica EZ Zoom), and this film did a great job of capturing golden and vivid colours. The blurry shots had a cinematic effect thanks to the retention of colour. Also boasts a surprisingly long range, even during falling light. Portraits are best in low lighting with flash, or on a cloudy day with sun directly overhead.
I always think of Ultramax as the big brother of ColorPlus. It's quite saturated and contrasty, which means I don't always love having it in my main camera. I think it's a good film to have in a point & shoot because ISO 400 is so versatile.The dynamic range isn't very forgiving, and in my experience it doesn't do very well when pushed - the grain is too pronounced, the shadows are murky and any colour cast gets even stronger (see my winterscape photo).What I do like about it is the way it renders blues - Gold is my favourite stock, but I never like how the sky comes out when shooting it. Ultramax on the other hand, I'm happy using it into blue hour because of the higher ISO and the way the colder tones look.
| Assembly required | No |
| Batteries required | No |
| Film colour | Color |
| Film format type | 135 |
| Exposures per roll | 36 |
