Men's Hoka Bondi x White/Evening Primrose 7 D

The back inside heel of the shoe ripped apart after less than three weeks, less than 60km of walking (both heels). Hoka called it normal wear and tear unbelievably. SVP was great with their response, but I'll trash talk Hoka every chance I get now after their response. I was so excited as I had read so much about their shoes, and they were definitely comfortable! But unusable after the back ripped out of them. Had well over $200 retail cost, I would expect shoes to last more than 3 weeks.

3rd times a charm

This was my first purchase of Hoka’s online. My husband has two pair. I normally wear a 12M in women’s shoes so a 10D should fit me perfectly. Unfortunately not. I’ve had to return these shoes twice to the store because I actually need an 11D. No matter what it takes, I want these shoes. They are so comfortable, stylish and lightweight on my feet.

Bondi X is a fantastic running shoe!

This is a fantastic shoe at this price. I run a lot of miles and this shoe is a great combination of cushion, weight, and spring. Its a great shoe for almost all of my road runs. I do prefer a lighter shoe for faster paced running but for the majority of my miles this shoe is perfect. I hope HOKA doesn't discontinue it!

First carbon shoes

These shoes provide a nice balance of a stiffer, bouncier ride, which I do feel improves running efficiency with a traditional cloud-like Hoka ride. With wide feet, I went for a half size up as they only seem to have the D width in the carbon sole shoes. I got them to help protect an injured toe and I can say that stiffness does seem to reduce the flex of the toes slightly (though I'm running pretty gently in them so far). People have complained about a very short tongue, which I will say is odd, however so far the laces haven't rubbed on my ankle or popped off the tongue, and I'm using the heel-lock extra hole. Laces are the right length, and hold snug once tied. At $190 for carbon shoes, these are a fantastic deal.

Good Shoe, but.....

I only run in Hoka. I'm I huge fan and have a few thousand miles in running different models. What I like: the carbon fiber provides a bit of a different feel. It's not a bounce but a bit of a rebound when striking the ground, and it makes a little difference when you want to pick up the pace on a speed workout. Other than this, they ride like the Hokas you've come to love. Here's what I don't like: I'm a multi-surface runner. 60% asphalt, and 40%... everything else. The sole of the shoe has 4 small openings that pick up ever sort of material, which is ok by me, until it's gravel. Little Rock's get stuck in the sole and when I get back on pavement I sound like a tap dancer, and I have to stop and remove all the rocks. No bueno. Also I really, really dislike the ... MoreI only run in Hoka. I'm I huge fan and have a few thousand miles in running different models. What I like: the carbon fiber provides a bit of a different feel. It's not a bounce but a bit of a rebound when striking the ground, and it makes a little difference when you want to pick up the pace on a speed workout. Other than this, they ride like the Hokas you've come to love. Here's what I don't like: I'm a multi-surface runner. 60% asphalt, and 40%... everything else. The sole of the shoe has 4 small openings that pick up ever sort of material, which is ok by me, until it's gravel. Little Rock's get stuck in the sole and when I get back on pavement I sound like a tap dancer, and I have to stop and remove all the rocks. No bueno. Also I really, really dislike the tongue. It's completely un-padded and very short. This matters because regardless of your method of tying the shoe if you like them snug, you WILL feel the knot on your skin. This might sound trivial but if all you notice is the knot on your ankle and resort to extra thick socks, that's no bueno. Lastly, I love shoes and my goal is not to see how many miles I can get out of them before they disintegrate. Before falling in love with the Hoka ride, I wore ASICS, Nike, and Brooks. I typically got 300 miles on a pair and maybe could have squeezed out a few more miles. I'm on my 12th pair of Hokas and average 200 miles. I've taken them to 240 miles and it was not pretty. I reorder at 180-200 miles. This is costly. I think they're worth the money. At least you don't need to worry about breaking them in; I can go right from the box to a 1/2 marathon. Hoka: if you're listening.... please change the tongue 👅

Just arrived

Broke them out of the box and they are very colorful. Not my usual style, but I wanted something different and I got it.I ordered a half size bigger and they fit well.I still have to get used to them but my first thought is that they are a bit clumsy/cloddy. They are light with good support and a nice roomy box toe. Hoping I end up loving them because even discounted they were expensive.

My review of the Hoka Running shoe

I was thoroughly surprised to get this offer for the Hoka running shoe and best of all was that the only size you offered was my size 8D. I couldn't believe it. Prior to this, I had seen some Nike tennis shoes that I really liked but could not find my size anywhere. I was exstatic to receive your offer. I love the look and feel of these shoes and look forward to making more purchases from you in the future. Thanks!!!!

Overall good shoe for long distance.

I've had the Bondi X for a few weeks and generally run between 6-15km per run 3 times a week. I consider myself a casual runner (for the past 12 years), generally fit and in my mid 40's. In addition, I have previously used the Bondi Clifton (500km plus) so I can now compare the two. I found the Clifton extremely spongy and soft and after running beyond 15km's, I get pains on the outer side of my knee area in which I couldn't figure out why until a friend suggested that perhaps my shoes did not give enough stability. I didn't have this problem with the Bondi X and the only reason I can put it on is that the carbon plate is likely stabilizing my ground contact and hence my knees are not suffering. On short fast running days, I feel the shoe becoming responsive (not as ... MoreI've had the Bondi X for a few weeks and generally run between 6-15km per run 3 times a week. I consider myself a casual runner (for the past 12 years), generally fit and in my mid 40's. In addition, I have previously used the Bondi Clifton (500km plus) so I can now compare the two. I found the Clifton extremely spongy and soft and after running beyond 15km's, I get pains on the outer side of my knee area in which I couldn't figure out why until a friend suggested that perhaps my shoes did not give enough stability. I didn't have this problem with the Bondi X and the only reason I can put it on is that the carbon plate is likely stabilizing my ground contact and hence my knees are not suffering. On short fast running days, I feel the shoe becoming responsive (not as responsive as the Clifton) as I change my running style but I feel the Bondi X at best for long distance (12km plus). The biggest negative about this shoe is that terrible tongue - its very short and I have to often stop and pull them back up. On long runs, it the tongue goes under the laces and its very annoying. Other than that it's a good neutral shoe that offers a bit of stability.

These Shoes are not for Everyone!

I have spent a lifetime, dealing with Plantar fasciitis and heard rave reviews about Hoka shoes. More specifically, the Bondi, so I had to try these. I have medium to low arches. These shoes feel like they are made for someone with a much higher arch, because I felt like I was standing with a ball under my arches. Sure, it takes the weight off your heel and reduces the heel pain that you experience with plantar fasciitis, but EVERYTHING on my feet were so achy after just a few hours of wear, I had to take these back. Also, style wise, if you have a larger foot like me (I wear a Men's 13), these shoes will make your feet look enormous. They claim these are light weight??? Not really. They feel heavier than my Brooks and On Cloud sneakers, which I find both to be more ... MoreI have spent a lifetime, dealing with Plantar fasciitis and heard rave reviews about Hoka shoes. More specifically, the Bondi, so I had to try these. I have medium to low arches. These shoes feel like they are made for someone with a much higher arch, because I felt like I was standing with a ball under my arches. Sure, it takes the weight off your heel and reduces the heel pain that you experience with plantar fasciitis, but EVERYTHING on my feet were so achy after just a few hours of wear, I had to take these back. Also, style wise, if you have a larger foot like me (I wear a Men's 13), these shoes will make your feet look enormous. They claim these are light weight??? Not really. They feel heavier than my Brooks and On Cloud sneakers, which I find both to be more comfortable than these. So sorry that Hoka shoes will not be making it in to my rotation.

This is NOT a Bondi

This is NOT a Bondi with an X. The lack of padding around the ankle caused sharp pain on the outside of my ankle. The waaay too short and too thin tongue made using the last eye hole impossible. The too bright and garish color scheme prevent them from being an option for work. Hoka, please try again and put the "X" sole into the Bondi. Fleet Feet were awesome to work with in store and online. I will definitely continue using them in the future. I'll still buy the regular Bondi which is the bomb for work and play.