Fly through the trails with the Saucony Peregrine 12. This tried and true trail shoe has everything that you love from previous versions of the Peregrine but in a lighter, more comfortable and more protective package. In our Peregrine 12 review, testers noted that ldquoIt still feels like the Peregrine that I have known and loved for the past several years, but itrsquos noticeably lighter, more nimble and grippier.rdquo Saucony added a new bendable rock plate that gives you protection and a smooth ride on rocky trails. It also allows the shoe to drain when you are running through streams, rivers or puddles. They redesigned the PWRTRAC outsole to give you better traction and allow you to dig in and take off with speed. Feel comfortable during long or short trail runs with Sauconyrsquos soft, springy PWRRUN cushioning. They even added more comfort with a new sockliner made with PWRRUN+ cushioning. The upper has been stripped down to give you a more comfortable feel. But there is now a tighter weave that keeps dirt and debris out, while still being breathable. Plus, they retooled the laces, using fabric eyelets for a tighter, more locked-down fit. Strategic overlays on the upper to protect against sticks and stones and a toe guard keeps you from stubbing your toe on roots. Take on the trails with confidence in the Saucony Peregrine 12.
Fly through the trails with the Saucony Peregrine 12. This tried and true trail shoe has everything that you love from previous versions of the Peregrine but in a lighter, more comfortable and more protective package. In our Peregrine 12 review, testers noted that ldquoIt still feels like the Peregrine that I have known and loved for the past several years, but itrsquos noticeably lighter, more nimble and grippier.rdquo Saucony added a new bendable rock plate that gives you protection and a smooth ride on rocky trails. It also allows the shoe to drain when you are running through streams, rivers or puddles. They redesigned the PWRTRAC outsole to give you better traction and allow you to dig in and take off with speed. Feel comfortable during long or short trail runs with Sauconyrsquos soft, springy PWRRUN cushioning. They even added more comfort with a new sockliner made with PWRRUN+ cushioning. The upper has been stripped down to give you a more comfortable feel. But there is now a tighter weave that keeps dirt and debris out, while still being breathable. Plus, they retooled the laces, using fabric eyelets for a tighter, more locked-down fit. Strategic overlays on the upper to protect against sticks and stones and a toe guard keeps you from stubbing your toe on roots. Take on the trails with confidence in the Saucony Peregrine 12.
Saucony Peregrine 12 Mens
Fly through the trails with the Saucony Peregrine 12. This tried and true trail shoe has everything that you love from previous versions of the Peregrine but in a lighter, more comfortable and more protective package. In our Peregrine 12 review, testers noted that ldquoIt still feels like the Peregrine that I have known and loved for the past several years, but itrsquos noticeably lighter, more nimble and grippier.rdquo Saucony added a new bendable rock plate that gives you protection and a smooth ride on rocky trails. It also allows the shoe to drain when you are running through streams, rivers or puddles. They redesigned the PWRTRAC outsole to give you better traction and allow you to dig in and take off with speed. Feel comfortable during long or short trail runs with Sauconyrsquos soft, springy PWRRUN cushioning. They even added more comfort with a new sockliner made with PWRRUN+ cushioning. The upper has been stripped down to give you a more comfortable feel. But there is now a tighter weave that keeps dirt and debris out, while still being breathable. Plus, they retooled the laces, using fabric eyelets for a tighter, more locked-down fit. Strategic overlays on the upper to protect against sticks and stones and a toe guard keeps you from stubbing your toe on roots. Take on the trails with confidence in the Saucony Peregrine 12.
Fly through the trails with the Saucony Peregrine 12. This tried and true trail shoe has everything that you love from previous versions of the Peregrine but in a lighter, more comfortable and more protective package. In our Peregrine 12 review, testers noted that ldquoIt still feels like the Peregrine that I have known and loved for the past several years, but itrsquos noticeably lighter, more nimble and grippier.rdquo Saucony added a new bendable rock plate that gives you protection and a smooth ride on rocky trails. It also allows the shoe to drain when you are running through streams, rivers or puddles. They redesigned the PWRTRAC outsole to give you better traction and allow you to dig in and take off with speed. Feel comfortable during long or short trail runs with Sauconyrsquos soft, springy PWRRUN cushioning. They even added more comfort with a new sockliner made with PWRRUN+ cushioning. The upper has been stripped down to give you a more comfortable feel. But there is now a tighter weave that keeps dirt and debris out, while still being breathable. Plus, they retooled the laces, using fabric eyelets for a tighter, more locked-down fit. Strategic overlays on the upper to protect against sticks and stones and a toe guard keeps you from stubbing your toe on roots. Take on the trails with confidence in the Saucony Peregrine 12.
originally posted on saucony.com
Run lots of trails in Colorado and have used a couple different Peregrines. This one has the best fit and feel and outsole. Lockdown is great, secure fit through midfoot and heel and just enough room in the toebox. It feels light, nimble, and fast and the grip is great in technical terrain.I have two issues that I hope constitute the only changes for version 13:1- the upper is very comfy but not durable- tears afters about 150mi2- this is more personal, but I wouldn't mind another mm or so of stack. This is a <3hr shoe for me simply because the midsole isn't the most comfortable and my feet start to get beat. For my 1.5hr midweek jaunts, it's perfect, but a little more cushion could make this more usable for meAll in all I really like the peregrine 12 and I ... MoreRun lots of trails in Colorado and have used a couple different Peregrines. This one has the best fit and feel and outsole. Lockdown is great, secure fit through midfoot and heel and just enough room in the toebox. It feels light, nimble, and fast and the grip is great in technical terrain.I have two issues that I hope constitute the only changes for version 13:1- the upper is very comfy but not durable- tears afters about 150mi2- this is more personal, but I wouldn't mind another mm or so of stack. This is a <3hr shoe for me simply because the midsole isn't the most comfortable and my feet start to get beat. For my 1.5hr midweek jaunts, it's perfect, but a little more cushion could make this more usable for meAll in all I really like the peregrine 12 and I hope they don't stray too far on the 13
originally posted on saucony.com
So I got these this last week, and let's just say that they're "fine". I mean, Vans makes "fine" shoes that you could run in too in a pinch. They look really good, and the outsole is grippy and good in the wet. And kudos for bringing the weight down through the upper revision, but it would also seem that they did this by narrowing the toe a bit too. I don't know if Saucony is trying to take up the mantle that Asics surrendered as the shoes that only fit people with narrow feet, but it sure seems like it sometimes. And that would be fine, I mean, they make a wide, but this shoes isn't good enough for me to go out of my way to get a wide in some boring color. And that's the thing, this thing is firm and still quite stiff despite reports that the rock plate is more ... MoreSo I got these this last week, and let's just say that they're "fine". I mean, Vans makes "fine" shoes that you could run in too in a pinch. They look really good, and the outsole is grippy and good in the wet. And kudos for bringing the weight down through the upper revision, but it would also seem that they did this by narrowing the toe a bit too. I don't know if Saucony is trying to take up the mantle that Asics surrendered as the shoes that only fit people with narrow feet, but it sure seems like it sometimes. And that would be fine, I mean, they make a wide, but this shoes isn't good enough for me to go out of my way to get a wide in some boring color. And that's the thing, this thing is firm and still quite stiff despite reports that the rock plate is more flexible. Pick one up and flex it, to get that rock plate to flex with your hands takes some thought, but it folds real nice in the middle of the shoe. And here's the other thing, again, what the heck is the point of this shoe? Is it for off trail scrambling or vertical K's as the outsole and rockplate might suggest? Well, if it is it should either be built up with more protection for the off trail goodness, or shaved down in weight for those veritical K's. I'm sure folks are gonna do 50ks in these, maybe longer, but the average person isn't gonna find this shoe real cushiony or real responsive (unless you think responsive shoes are what they were 10 years ago). It just kind of is. I would drop the rock plate, add a little more midsole, round out that toe box just a bit and you would have a decent shoe with a 4 mm drop that is fairly light. Heck, don't even add midsole, the lack of rockplate would significantly soften the ride. Oh, and the heel is too high, rubs on my achilles because for some goofy reason it is stiff as heck. I guess that's the trend in running shoes, stiff, vertifcal heels...but of course it's not. I sometimes wonder who the heck gets paid for the design of some of these companies shoes. I mean, sure, these things will sell, but will they sell what they could if they actually kept up with the industry trends...I would argue not. So if you like old Peregrines, maybe you'll like this one, but that heel and toe might be just too much for you. Unless you're coming from running in old Salomon's just about everything else out there in trail runnning is gonna probably appeal to you more than these will. And for the record, I'm returning these because they are too uncomfortable for a barely average performance.
originally posted on saucony.com
This is my 2nd pair of Saucony “Peregrine” I have wear… I hiked 2 sections of the PCT with them under different conditions:Peregrine 11 (400 miles - Desert):Behaved flawlessly, with my sox configuration I´ve got practically no blisters. The materials feel sturdy and strong, with a very good combination of cushion in the heel and tongue, which made them very comfortable.Peregrine 12 (250 miles – Sierra Nevada):My first impression where that this new pair was a little lighter, which overall is always good… As I wear them I notice that in this model the cushion from the heel and tongue was basically gone (I’m guessing to lose some weight). This change made at least for me a hot spot on the heel that created a big blister. The fabric overall feels thinner and ... MoreThis is my 2nd pair of Saucony “Peregrine” I have wear… I hiked 2 sections of the PCT with them under different conditions:Peregrine 11 (400 miles - Desert):Behaved flawlessly, with my sox configuration I´ve got practically no blisters. The materials feel sturdy and strong, with a very good combination of cushion in the heel and tongue, which made them very comfortable.Peregrine 12 (250 miles – Sierra Nevada):My first impression where that this new pair was a little lighter, which overall is always good… As I wear them I notice that in this model the cushion from the heel and tongue was basically gone (I’m guessing to lose some weight). This change made at least for me a hot spot on the heel that created a big blister. The fabric overall feels thinner and lighter and can definitely see some abrasion quicker than with the previous model.
| Offset | 4mm |
Run lots of trails in Colorado and have used a couple different Peregrines. This one has the best fit and feel and outsole. Lockdown is great, secure fit through midfoot and heel and just enough room in the toebox. It feels light, nimble, and fast and the grip is great in technical terrain.I have two issues that I hope constitute the only changes for version 13:1- the upper is very comfy but not durable- tears afters about 150mi2- this is more personal, but I wouldn't mind another mm or so of stack. This is a <3hr shoe for me simply because the midsole isn't the most comfortable and my feet start to get beat. For my 1.5hr midweek jaunts, it's perfect, but a little more cushion could make this more usable for meAll in all I really like the peregrine 12 and I ... MoreRun lots of trails in Colorado and have used a couple different Peregrines. This one has the best fit and feel and outsole. Lockdown is great, secure fit through midfoot and heel and just enough room in the toebox. It feels light, nimble, and fast and the grip is great in technical terrain.I have two issues that I hope constitute the only changes for version 13:1- the upper is very comfy but not durable- tears afters about 150mi2- this is more personal, but I wouldn't mind another mm or so of stack. This is a <3hr shoe for me simply because the midsole isn't the most comfortable and my feet start to get beat. For my 1.5hr midweek jaunts, it's perfect, but a little more cushion could make this more usable for meAll in all I really like the peregrine 12 and I hope they don't stray too far on the 13
So I got these this last week, and let's just say that they're "fine". I mean, Vans makes "fine" shoes that you could run in too in a pinch. They look really good, and the outsole is grippy and good in the wet. And kudos for bringing the weight down through the upper revision, but it would also seem that they did this by narrowing the toe a bit too. I don't know if Saucony is trying to take up the mantle that Asics surrendered as the shoes that only fit people with narrow feet, but it sure seems like it sometimes. And that would be fine, I mean, they make a wide, but this shoes isn't good enough for me to go out of my way to get a wide in some boring color. And that's the thing, this thing is firm and still quite stiff despite reports that the rock plate is more ... MoreSo I got these this last week, and let's just say that they're "fine". I mean, Vans makes "fine" shoes that you could run in too in a pinch. They look really good, and the outsole is grippy and good in the wet. And kudos for bringing the weight down through the upper revision, but it would also seem that they did this by narrowing the toe a bit too. I don't know if Saucony is trying to take up the mantle that Asics surrendered as the shoes that only fit people with narrow feet, but it sure seems like it sometimes. And that would be fine, I mean, they make a wide, but this shoes isn't good enough for me to go out of my way to get a wide in some boring color. And that's the thing, this thing is firm and still quite stiff despite reports that the rock plate is more flexible. Pick one up and flex it, to get that rock plate to flex with your hands takes some thought, but it folds real nice in the middle of the shoe. And here's the other thing, again, what the heck is the point of this shoe? Is it for off trail scrambling or vertical K's as the outsole and rockplate might suggest? Well, if it is it should either be built up with more protection for the off trail goodness, or shaved down in weight for those veritical K's. I'm sure folks are gonna do 50ks in these, maybe longer, but the average person isn't gonna find this shoe real cushiony or real responsive (unless you think responsive shoes are what they were 10 years ago). It just kind of is. I would drop the rock plate, add a little more midsole, round out that toe box just a bit and you would have a decent shoe with a 4 mm drop that is fairly light. Heck, don't even add midsole, the lack of rockplate would significantly soften the ride. Oh, and the heel is too high, rubs on my achilles because for some goofy reason it is stiff as heck. I guess that's the trend in running shoes, stiff, vertifcal heels...but of course it's not. I sometimes wonder who the heck gets paid for the design of some of these companies shoes. I mean, sure, these things will sell, but will they sell what they could if they actually kept up with the industry trends...I would argue not. So if you like old Peregrines, maybe you'll like this one, but that heel and toe might be just too much for you. Unless you're coming from running in old Salomon's just about everything else out there in trail runnning is gonna probably appeal to you more than these will. And for the record, I'm returning these because they are too uncomfortable for a barely average performance.
This is my 2nd pair of Saucony “Peregrine” I have wear… I hiked 2 sections of the PCT with them under different conditions:Peregrine 11 (400 miles - Desert):Behaved flawlessly, with my sox configuration I´ve got practically no blisters. The materials feel sturdy and strong, with a very good combination of cushion in the heel and tongue, which made them very comfortable.Peregrine 12 (250 miles – Sierra Nevada):My first impression where that this new pair was a little lighter, which overall is always good… As I wear them I notice that in this model the cushion from the heel and tongue was basically gone (I’m guessing to lose some weight). This change made at least for me a hot spot on the heel that created a big blister. The fabric overall feels thinner and ... MoreThis is my 2nd pair of Saucony “Peregrine” I have wear… I hiked 2 sections of the PCT with them under different conditions:Peregrine 11 (400 miles - Desert):Behaved flawlessly, with my sox configuration I´ve got practically no blisters. The materials feel sturdy and strong, with a very good combination of cushion in the heel and tongue, which made them very comfortable.Peregrine 12 (250 miles – Sierra Nevada):My first impression where that this new pair was a little lighter, which overall is always good… As I wear them I notice that in this model the cushion from the heel and tongue was basically gone (I’m guessing to lose some weight). This change made at least for me a hot spot on the heel that created a big blister. The fabric overall feels thinner and lighter and can definitely see some abrasion quicker than with the previous model.
I have been running in Peregrines for 5 or six years now. I have plowed through probably 15+ different pairs of this shoe with 1000s of miles run, and I never had a complaint. It was by far the best trail shoe on the market. Thennnnnn the Peregrine 12 comes along, and totally dismantles all faith I had in Saucony. From the moment I put them on my feet, everything was wrong and very different from past models - toe box too narrow, underfoot width seemed narrower and less stable, the upper material is much cheaper, and the tongue is not padded at all. I pushed through this disappointment, believing that Saucony knew something I didn't and I quite literally had one the worst runs of my last decade in these shoes. It was a hilly, 5 mile desert run in the Catalinas near ... MoreI have been running in Peregrines for 5 or six years now. I have plowed through probably 15+ different pairs of this shoe with 1000s of miles run, and I never had a complaint. It was by far the best trail shoe on the market. Thennnnnn the Peregrine 12 comes along, and totally dismantles all faith I had in Saucony. From the moment I put them on my feet, everything was wrong and very different from past models - toe box too narrow, underfoot width seemed narrower and less stable, the upper material is much cheaper, and the tongue is not padded at all. I pushed through this disappointment, believing that Saucony knew something I didn't and I quite literally had one the worst runs of my last decade in these shoes. It was a hilly, 5 mile desert run in the Catalinas near Tucson, and at the end of the run my legs ached and stayed that way the rest of the day. I'm no stranger to running pain and this was 100% caused by the shoes - not muscle fatigue, not variation in my strides, but instead the cheapest version of these shoes I have ever bought. They were still $130.What I can't figure out, is why every shoe company insists on chasing the dragon - making the "newest and best" model of one of their best selling shoes and inevitably they screw it up. It happens EVERY time. Stop "fixing" things that aren't broken. Just change the colors and runners who like these shoes will keep coming back. I have been a Saucony guy now for many years, and unfortunately I now have the pleasure of finding my new favorite shoe, which will not be Saucony - for road or for trail.
Disappointed with this version of the Peregrine. I bought last year's shoes as a lightweight/low cushion trail runner and was happy with them. These shoes are very stylish and are largely similar to prior version, but the interior cushioning against the Achilles wore out within the first 3 days/20 miles of walking in them. The decision to change the design on the Achilles cushioning make these shoes un-recommendable. They wore down to the plastic shoe structure within 40 miles of use. I had them on a trip as my only pair of shoes for walking/running and had to wear blister tape and ended up stuffing cotton swabs in the cushioning to try and stave off blisters. Great looking shoe, don't see myself buying another Peregrine unless the cushioning is fixed. They're at 90 ... MoreDisappointed with this version of the Peregrine. I bought last year's shoes as a lightweight/low cushion trail runner and was happy with them. These shoes are very stylish and are largely similar to prior version, but the interior cushioning against the Achilles wore out within the first 3 days/20 miles of walking in them. The decision to change the design on the Achilles cushioning make these shoes un-recommendable. They wore down to the plastic shoe structure within 40 miles of use. I had them on a trip as my only pair of shoes for walking/running and had to wear blister tape and ended up stuffing cotton swabs in the cushioning to try and stave off blisters. Great looking shoe, don't see myself buying another Peregrine unless the cushioning is fixed. They're at 90 miles and I've got tape in the heels, not sure I can continue to use them.
I absolutely loved the Peregrine 11. It was my first pair of Saucony trail shoes, and everything seemed perfect out of the box. With the Peregrine 12, there were several changes to the upper that I can't understand. The shoe has so much room that I nearly cinch the eyelets together when tying them (see photo for comparison with Peregrine 11). I do have narrow feet, but this makes the fit less comfortable. The previous eyelets felt sturdy because they were integrated firmly into the upper. Now the eyelets are flexible pieces of fabric sticking out from the upper, which feels less durable for trail running. I also preferred the previously thicker tongue. I realize this was likely a change to lower the weight, but I would sacrifice the weight to have a tongue that ... MoreI absolutely loved the Peregrine 11. It was my first pair of Saucony trail shoes, and everything seemed perfect out of the box. With the Peregrine 12, there were several changes to the upper that I can't understand. The shoe has so much room that I nearly cinch the eyelets together when tying them (see photo for comparison with Peregrine 11). I do have narrow feet, but this makes the fit less comfortable. The previous eyelets felt sturdy because they were integrated firmly into the upper. Now the eyelets are flexible pieces of fabric sticking out from the upper, which feels less durable for trail running. I also preferred the previously thicker tongue. I realize this was likely a change to lower the weight, but I would sacrifice the weight to have a tongue that stays in place above the laces. Overall, the style and color choices are great as always. I love the mint color with the black rear of the shoe. The outsole and lugs are solid. I may simply need to stack the Saucony insert with my custom insert in order to fit my foot more snuggly into the shoe. But I've never had this problem before, and I'm not sure why there was such a huge change from one version to the next. I love Saucony and I want to continue supporting this shoe. I hope the next version is a better fit for me.
Firstly, these are great shoes if you're looking for something designed to be light and grippy above all else. Unfortunately that wasn't what I was looking for.I use these shoes to go on runs over a mix of pavement, gravel, and dirt. I owned a pair of Peregrine 11s before these shoes, and they lasted about 9 months. These shoes have lasted only 3 months. The rock plate also hasn't worked nearly as well. I've had gravel just cut right through the plate. I'm a pretty heavy guy, and I doubt it'll be a problem for people under 200lbs, but I never had that issue with my last pair.So if you want a light, high performance shoe go right ahead and get these. But if you want something for casual running that's long lasting with a confidence inspiring rock plate, look ... MoreFirstly, these are great shoes if you're looking for something designed to be light and grippy above all else. Unfortunately that wasn't what I was looking for.I use these shoes to go on runs over a mix of pavement, gravel, and dirt. I owned a pair of Peregrine 11s before these shoes, and they lasted about 9 months. These shoes have lasted only 3 months. The rock plate also hasn't worked nearly as well. I've had gravel just cut right through the plate. I'm a pretty heavy guy, and I doubt it'll be a problem for people under 200lbs, but I never had that issue with my last pair.So if you want a light, high performance shoe go right ahead and get these. But if you want something for casual running that's long lasting with a confidence inspiring rock plate, look somewhere else.
Tested these babies out at a Spartan Super (10k) on a ski slope in Pennsylvania. I have to say, I was very happy with how they performed. They provided grip on the steep dirt inclines and declines. There were several areas of the course that was very rocky and full of roots, the ridged but forgiving steel bottom of the shoe protected my feet from the sharp edges with ease as well as providing cushion to keep going for miles. The spacious toebox kept my toes from ramming into one another while running down the mountain, no black toenails for this runner. Last but not least, the water obstacles. These shoes did very well keeping the water out of them. After the several feet of in and out mudslogging pits and trudging through the center of a shallow pond...these bad ... MoreTested these babies out at a Spartan Super (10k) on a ski slope in Pennsylvania. I have to say, I was very happy with how they performed. They provided grip on the steep dirt inclines and declines. There were several areas of the course that was very rocky and full of roots, the ridged but forgiving steel bottom of the shoe protected my feet from the sharp edges with ease as well as providing cushion to keep going for miles. The spacious toebox kept my toes from ramming into one another while running down the mountain, no black toenails for this runner. Last but not least, the water obstacles. These shoes did very well keeping the water out of them. After the several feet of in and out mudslogging pits and trudging through the center of a shallow pond...these bad boys sluffed off the water, no problem. Not once did my shoes make a wet farting noise from retained water or mud.The only negative i can draw from these awesome trail shoes is that the area around the ankle is a little too loose. Some small stones were found in them when i finally took them off for the day. I never felt them during the race!All in all, these are great shoes for any type of trail race in the Northeast. They can handle all the terrain a spartan race can throw at them, and do it with style.
Recently purchased on clearance sale. Long time user of HOKA shoes which are always amazing, but these caught my eye, had seen these on trail numerous times and was looking for show with some more aggressive tread needed in certain conditions. Have worn these on 2 short overnight backpacking trios and have been impressed. My biggest concern was toe spacing but am very happy with toe spacing, not cramped feeling. Tread on the shoe is excellent especially in wet, muddy and snowy trail conditions. The shoe was quite supportive and stable. The foam insole is maybe the best and really adds to the comfy but not squishy ride. This shoe will have a place for me and look forward to keeping Saucony in mind on future shoe considerations.
the 12s feel same as the 11s, very comfortable. the traction isnt as good on wet wood but feels better in the mud than the 11s. the tread ejects mud better than the 11s. the real difference is the breathability though. the 11s are uncomfortable above 65 degrees but the 12s have been great into the 80s. they also quickly clear water and dry to a comfortable level after downpours or running through creeks. the only complaint i can find is after 50 miles they started to wear a little spot where the toe bumper meets the lower overlay on the pinkie toe side. after an additional 30 miles the spot hasnt worn more. at first i was concerned but i think the shoes will still last 500 miles like the 11s although i may need to apply a patch. if the overlays came up another ... Morethe 12s feel same as the 11s, very comfortable. the traction isnt as good on wet wood but feels better in the mud than the 11s. the tread ejects mud better than the 11s. the real difference is the breathability though. the 11s are uncomfortable above 65 degrees but the 12s have been great into the 80s. they also quickly clear water and dry to a comfortable level after downpours or running through creeks. the only complaint i can find is after 50 miles they started to wear a little spot where the toe bumper meets the lower overlay on the pinkie toe side. after an additional 30 miles the spot hasnt worn more. at first i was concerned but i think the shoes will still last 500 miles like the 11s although i may need to apply a patch. if the overlays came up another centimeter they could prevent this problem
| Offset | 4mm |
