WD Green hard drives are designed for use in systems that require cool and quiet operation, as secondary drives in PCs, for external enclosures and other applications for which low noise and low heat are beneficial. These earth-friendly hard drives are ideal for use whenever energy efficiency is needed.
WD Green hard drives are designed for use in systems that require cool and quiet operation, as secondary drives in PCs, for external enclosures and other applications for which low noise and low heat are beneficial. These earth-friendly hard drives are ideal for use whenever energy efficiency is needed.
in 1 offers
The lowest price for WD Green WD15EARS - Hard Drive - 1.5 TB - Internal - 3.5" - SATA 3Gb/s - 5400 RPM - Buffer: 64 MB right now is $89.00 at PC Case Gear.
The all-time low was $35.00 on 1 Apr 2026 — today's price is 154% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 10 May 2026.
WD Green WD15EARS - Hard Drive - 1.5 TB - Internal - 3.5" - SATA 3Gb/s - 5400 RPM - Buffer: 64 MB
WD Green hard drives are designed for use in systems that require cool and quiet operation, as secondary drives in PCs, for external enclosures and other applications for which low noise and low heat are beneficial. These earth-friendly hard drives are ideal for use whenever energy efficiency is needed.
WD Green hard drives are designed for use in systems that require cool and quiet operation, as secondary drives in PCs, for external enclosures and other applications for which low noise and low heat are beneficial. These earth-friendly hard drives are ideal for use whenever energy efficiency is needed.
Last updated at 10/05/2026 18:07:14
Western Digital Green 1.5TB WD15EARS
60-day returns
originally posted on ebay.com
As an advanced technical user, I want to write a review to point a few things out and help everyone interested in WD's Caviar Green line get a better idea of what they should buy. The review written by babates2012-us contains a lot of misinformation that I will first like to address. I think what he meant to say was he didn't understand why the drive is made up of four 500GB (which he mistyped as 500MB) platters rather than one huge 2TB platter. First off, that in itself is incorrect - the WD20EARX uses three 667GB platters, rather than four 500GB platters. Secondly, the reason for multiple platters is because no 2TB platters exist. In fact, 1TB platters don't even exist yet. So to give this product a 3-star just because you don't have sufficient knowledge of hard ... MoreAs an advanced technical user, I want to write a review to point a few things out and help everyone interested in WD's Caviar Green line get a better idea of what they should buy. The review written by babates2012-us contains a lot of misinformation that I will first like to address. I think what he meant to say was he didn't understand why the drive is made up of four 500GB (which he mistyped as 500MB) platters rather than one huge 2TB platter. First off, that in itself is incorrect - the WD20EARX uses three 667GB platters, rather than four 500GB platters. Secondly, the reason for multiple platters is because no 2TB platters exist. In fact, 1TB platters don't even exist yet. So to give this product a 3-star just because you don't have sufficient knowledge of hard drive facts is very unfair. That being said, the WD20EARX is in some ways inferior to its predecessor, the WD20EARS. The WD20EARS comes in two flavors, those with the suffix 00J2GB0 and those with 00MVWB0. WD20EARS-00J2GB0 is the older model that uses four 500GB platters, while the newer WD20EARS-00MVWB0 uses three 667GB platters just like WD20EARX. The only advantage WD20EARX has over the WD20EARS-00MVWB0 is the SATA III interface, which supports up to 6.0Gbps, but that in itself is a bit misleading because a typical mechanical hard drive isn't fast enough to saturate the bandwidth of a SATA II port. So you won't be gaining any performance from the SATA III interface. Furthermore, WD20EARX actually performs a bit slower than the WD20EARS-00MVWB0 due to slightly slower spindle speed (I think a review mentioned 5200rpm rather than 5400). If you want the best performance out of a WD "Green" drive, go with the WD20EARS-00MVWB0. Buy the WD20EARX only if you want the manufacturer's warranty (pay attention to the manufacturing date in this case! WD only covers this drive for 2 years - so make sure you ask the seller beforehand for the manufacture date). Lastly, while WD's "Caviar Green" series does have the lowest power consumption and temperature compared to "Green" offerings from Samsung and Seagate, it is also the slowest in terms of performance due to its tendency to park the drive head whenever possible (I think 9 seconds after idle). This hurts the drive's access time. Just a little FYI for those looking for Green drives.
originally posted on neweggbusiness.com
I contacted WD after the second failed test and it was suggested in the reply that I use the RMA. The advanced replacement seems to be a nice option, but I have been very busy recently so I postponed the replacement. After all, despite the failed tests, the drive seems to be functioning normally. Today when I turned on the computer, well, the same thing that happened to the returned WD Blue happened to this hard drive: it showed up as unformatted. Fine, I have been doing backups everyday since I know I am using a time bomb, so it doesn't hurt that much. And after a reboot, everything came back, just as what happened to the WD blue. But imagine the heartache of having all your data on it with no backups and it suddenly shows up as unformatted and doesn't come back. ... MoreI contacted WD after the second failed test and it was suggested in the reply that I use the RMA. The advanced replacement seems to be a nice option, but I have been very busy recently so I postponed the replacement. After all, despite the failed tests, the drive seems to be functioning normally. Today when I turned on the computer, well, the same thing that happened to the returned WD Blue happened to this hard drive: it showed up as unformatted. Fine, I have been doing backups everyday since I know I am using a time bomb, so it doesn't hurt that much. And after a reboot, everything came back, just as what happened to the WD blue. But imagine the heartache of having all your data on it with no backups and it suddenly shows up as unformatted and doesn't come back. After all these, I think I have had enough with WD hard drives. Instead of RMAing it with WD for a replacement, I am going to return it while it's still under Newegg's 30 day coverage and get a different brand. Our of curiosity, I took my time to go through the reviews to see where the high ratings come from. It seems that a lot of them are written by PS3 gamers. If this is your intended use for the hard drive, and if you don't play games for a living and don't might losing everything and start all over again, go for it. Otherwise, save yourself some potential data, money and time losses and avoid this hard drive.
originally posted on ebay.com
The EADS is a great drive for its age and that is reflected in its resale value. These still hold their worth after 8 years in the field. Yes, 8 years is a long time for a drive but it's not possible to get a decent quality drive otherwise these days, and as far as finding a new drive that's not Advanced Format -- good luck. It's probably not suitable for a primary system drive as it likes to run at reduced RPMs. On the other hand this is what makes it quiet and cool running as opposed to a 7200 RPM drive. These are good old "legacy" 512 byte sector drives and they'll work on anything. No diddling with Advanced Format alignment software, no problems with multiple partitions, no wondering whether it will work with this version of Windows. The bits are bigger in the ... MoreThe EADS is a great drive for its age and that is reflected in its resale value. These still hold their worth after 8 years in the field. Yes, 8 years is a long time for a drive but it's not possible to get a decent quality drive otherwise these days, and as far as finding a new drive that's not Advanced Format -- good luck. It's probably not suitable for a primary system drive as it likes to run at reduced RPMs. On the other hand this is what makes it quiet and cool running as opposed to a 7200 RPM drive. These are good old "legacy" 512 byte sector drives and they'll work on anything. No diddling with Advanced Format alignment software, no problems with multiple partitions, no wondering whether it will work with this version of Windows. The bits are bigger in the EADS than they are in newer drives. That is literally true. The EADS has three platters rather than the later two platter and single platter drives. Thus the bits are physically bigger on the platters and the data reliability is correspondingly increased. The SMART data from WD drives seems to be more detailed than from Seagate drives, and at least in my opinion more truthful as well. These EADS drives replaced 750 GB Seagate drives that the SMART claimed was perfectly fine, but were still throwing CRC readerrors. It's WD for me from here on out as far as I'm concerned.
| General | |
| Device Type | Hard drive - internal |
| Capacity | 1.5 TB |
| Form Factor | 3.5" x 1/3H |
| Interface | SATA 3Gb/s |
Western Digital Green 1.5TB WD15EARS
60-day returns
As an advanced technical user, I want to write a review to point a few things out and help everyone interested in WD's Caviar Green line get a better idea of what they should buy. The review written by babates2012-us contains a lot of misinformation that I will first like to address. I think what he meant to say was he didn't understand why the drive is made up of four 500GB (which he mistyped as 500MB) platters rather than one huge 2TB platter. First off, that in itself is incorrect - the WD20EARX uses three 667GB platters, rather than four 500GB platters. Secondly, the reason for multiple platters is because no 2TB platters exist. In fact, 1TB platters don't even exist yet. So to give this product a 3-star just because you don't have sufficient knowledge of hard ... MoreAs an advanced technical user, I want to write a review to point a few things out and help everyone interested in WD's Caviar Green line get a better idea of what they should buy. The review written by babates2012-us contains a lot of misinformation that I will first like to address. I think what he meant to say was he didn't understand why the drive is made up of four 500GB (which he mistyped as 500MB) platters rather than one huge 2TB platter. First off, that in itself is incorrect - the WD20EARX uses three 667GB platters, rather than four 500GB platters. Secondly, the reason for multiple platters is because no 2TB platters exist. In fact, 1TB platters don't even exist yet. So to give this product a 3-star just because you don't have sufficient knowledge of hard drive facts is very unfair. That being said, the WD20EARX is in some ways inferior to its predecessor, the WD20EARS. The WD20EARS comes in two flavors, those with the suffix 00J2GB0 and those with 00MVWB0. WD20EARS-00J2GB0 is the older model that uses four 500GB platters, while the newer WD20EARS-00MVWB0 uses three 667GB platters just like WD20EARX. The only advantage WD20EARX has over the WD20EARS-00MVWB0 is the SATA III interface, which supports up to 6.0Gbps, but that in itself is a bit misleading because a typical mechanical hard drive isn't fast enough to saturate the bandwidth of a SATA II port. So you won't be gaining any performance from the SATA III interface. Furthermore, WD20EARX actually performs a bit slower than the WD20EARS-00MVWB0 due to slightly slower spindle speed (I think a review mentioned 5200rpm rather than 5400). If you want the best performance out of a WD "Green" drive, go with the WD20EARS-00MVWB0. Buy the WD20EARX only if you want the manufacturer's warranty (pay attention to the manufacturing date in this case! WD only covers this drive for 2 years - so make sure you ask the seller beforehand for the manufacture date). Lastly, while WD's "Caviar Green" series does have the lowest power consumption and temperature compared to "Green" offerings from Samsung and Seagate, it is also the slowest in terms of performance due to its tendency to park the drive head whenever possible (I think 9 seconds after idle). This hurts the drive's access time. Just a little FYI for those looking for Green drives.
I contacted WD after the second failed test and it was suggested in the reply that I use the RMA. The advanced replacement seems to be a nice option, but I have been very busy recently so I postponed the replacement. After all, despite the failed tests, the drive seems to be functioning normally. Today when I turned on the computer, well, the same thing that happened to the returned WD Blue happened to this hard drive: it showed up as unformatted. Fine, I have been doing backups everyday since I know I am using a time bomb, so it doesn't hurt that much. And after a reboot, everything came back, just as what happened to the WD blue. But imagine the heartache of having all your data on it with no backups and it suddenly shows up as unformatted and doesn't come back. ... MoreI contacted WD after the second failed test and it was suggested in the reply that I use the RMA. The advanced replacement seems to be a nice option, but I have been very busy recently so I postponed the replacement. After all, despite the failed tests, the drive seems to be functioning normally. Today when I turned on the computer, well, the same thing that happened to the returned WD Blue happened to this hard drive: it showed up as unformatted. Fine, I have been doing backups everyday since I know I am using a time bomb, so it doesn't hurt that much. And after a reboot, everything came back, just as what happened to the WD blue. But imagine the heartache of having all your data on it with no backups and it suddenly shows up as unformatted and doesn't come back. After all these, I think I have had enough with WD hard drives. Instead of RMAing it with WD for a replacement, I am going to return it while it's still under Newegg's 30 day coverage and get a different brand. Our of curiosity, I took my time to go through the reviews to see where the high ratings come from. It seems that a lot of them are written by PS3 gamers. If this is your intended use for the hard drive, and if you don't play games for a living and don't might losing everything and start all over again, go for it. Otherwise, save yourself some potential data, money and time losses and avoid this hard drive.
The EADS is a great drive for its age and that is reflected in its resale value. These still hold their worth after 8 years in the field. Yes, 8 years is a long time for a drive but it's not possible to get a decent quality drive otherwise these days, and as far as finding a new drive that's not Advanced Format -- good luck. It's probably not suitable for a primary system drive as it likes to run at reduced RPMs. On the other hand this is what makes it quiet and cool running as opposed to a 7200 RPM drive. These are good old "legacy" 512 byte sector drives and they'll work on anything. No diddling with Advanced Format alignment software, no problems with multiple partitions, no wondering whether it will work with this version of Windows. The bits are bigger in the ... MoreThe EADS is a great drive for its age and that is reflected in its resale value. These still hold their worth after 8 years in the field. Yes, 8 years is a long time for a drive but it's not possible to get a decent quality drive otherwise these days, and as far as finding a new drive that's not Advanced Format -- good luck. It's probably not suitable for a primary system drive as it likes to run at reduced RPMs. On the other hand this is what makes it quiet and cool running as opposed to a 7200 RPM drive. These are good old "legacy" 512 byte sector drives and they'll work on anything. No diddling with Advanced Format alignment software, no problems with multiple partitions, no wondering whether it will work with this version of Windows. The bits are bigger in the EADS than they are in newer drives. That is literally true. The EADS has three platters rather than the later two platter and single platter drives. Thus the bits are physically bigger on the platters and the data reliability is correspondingly increased. The SMART data from WD drives seems to be more detailed than from Seagate drives, and at least in my opinion more truthful as well. These EADS drives replaced 750 GB Seagate drives that the SMART claimed was perfectly fine, but were still throwing CRC readerrors. It's WD for me from here on out as far as I'm concerned.
Keep in mind when upgrading the HDD of a PS3, the drive will be completely empty. Therefor you will need to download the PS3's Operating System Firmware from the Sony website. You then need a flash drive. What you want to do is open your flash drive folder, and make a folder called PS3. ( MUST BE IN ALL CAPS ). Then inside the PS3 folder, you are going to make another folder called UPDATE ( MUST BE IN ALL CAPS ). Then you are going to open the UPDATE folder, and slide in the firmware you downloaded from Sony. Once you do that, put the flash drive in the PS3, and just follow the on screen prompts to get the PS3 to install the OS. As soon as you turn on the PS3 with the new drive, it's going to tell you the PS3 cannot boot because there is no operating system or ... MoreKeep in mind when upgrading the HDD of a PS3, the drive will be completely empty. Therefor you will need to download the PS3's Operating System Firmware from the Sony website. You then need a flash drive. What you want to do is open your flash drive folder, and make a folder called PS3. ( MUST BE IN ALL CAPS ). Then inside the PS3 folder, you are going to make another folder called UPDATE ( MUST BE IN ALL CAPS ). Then you are going to open the UPDATE folder, and slide in the firmware you downloaded from Sony. Once you do that, put the flash drive in the PS3, and just follow the on screen prompts to get the PS3 to install the OS. As soon as you turn on the PS3 with the new drive, it's going to tell you the PS3 cannot boot because there is no operating system or something in that nature, and all you need to do is just follow the simple on screen instructions to get going. Once the firmware is installed, you will be prompted to make a user account, and set the date, and time, and stuff like that. Once that is done, the PS3 restarts, and you're off to the races. Also, for the people out there who are hardware smart. This may be the perfect time to exchange the thermal paste on your CPU and GPU. The stock thermal paste Sony uses is very cheap, and dries out after about 2 years of normal use, leaving the chips BONE DRY which can cause strong overheating and eventually lead to the YLOD. I recently just took mine apart, cleaned off the old thermal paste, and applied Artic Silver 5, blew out the case with air duster, cleaned everything out, even the fan, put everything back together, and now my PS3 is running better than it did brand new. I also happened to do my friends last night after begging him for a week, and now hes so glad he did it. It's not hard to do, and will do your PS3 wonders. I also would like to point out that a 7200RPM drive in the PS3 doesn't seem to be creating more heat at all. My fan is always on low, and nothing seems like it's hesitating at all. Everything seems MINT. Especially after cleaning it out, and putting new paste. I honestly feel the extra 1 or 2 degrees from the faster drive is not going to phase the PS3 at all.
And it still works fine. There's a few bad sectors, as that has set off a SMART error for years but nothing mechanically wrong with it. Cheers to Western Digital. They're the only consumer hard drive I'll buy. Saw this on my order page and, hell, why not give it a review. I did a build back in October 2009 when I was in college. This drive is the only remaining thing I have in my latest build. It has space for three 3.5" drives so why not include it.
Purchased this drive new from Newegg on 8/9/2018 and installed it in my NAS. It died on 9/13/2019 so I inquired about a warranty (3 years) return/replacement. After not hering from the seller for four days, I phoned Newegg. They said the manufacturer would handle it. I called Western Digital where I was directed to it website to determine that the drive was under warranty and fill out the paperwork. Guess what? According to Western Digital, the warranty on this drive expired 01/16/2013 --five years and 7 months BEFORE I bought it! Well GOL-LEE! How does that happen. I purchased a replacement drive as soon as this one died. Needless to say (but I'm going to say it anyway), I'm going to check the warranty status of the drive I just bought to avoid future surprises.
RIP WD green drive. You will be replaced by one of your brethren soon, probably a purple drive designed for Surveillance systems. Salute to WD for making such great drives. I have many others that have lasted even longer including my first "BIG" drive I ever purchased which was a 2TB black drive back in probably 2004 or 2005 and that is still going and has been in and out of probably 4 or 5 PCs since it has been purchased. I trust WD with my data more than any other company out there. I have had way too many Seagates fail and have lost a lot of data in the past because of it. This is probably the first WD drive I use for storage that I have had fail on me. I have had smaller drives that were my OS drives fail, but their lifespan usually is shorter simply cause they ... MoreRIP WD green drive. You will be replaced by one of your brethren soon, probably a purple drive designed for Surveillance systems. Salute to WD for making such great drives. I have many others that have lasted even longer including my first "BIG" drive I ever purchased which was a 2TB black drive back in probably 2004 or 2005 and that is still going and has been in and out of probably 4 or 5 PCs since it has been purchased. I trust WD with my data more than any other company out there. I have had way too many Seagates fail and have lost a lot of data in the past because of it. This is probably the first WD drive I use for storage that I have had fail on me. I have had smaller drives that were my OS drives fail, but their lifespan usually is shorter simply cause they get used more than a storage drive. A small tip for anyone buying a storage drive, backup your data to it, for the first month, keep a copy of all the data stored on it, just to make sure you didn't get a bad drive and even afterwards, you should always have a backup of your backup, follow the 3-2-1 rule. 3 copies on 2 mediums and 1 offsite. I usually have 1 on my hard drive, 1 on a USB backup drive (get a big 4TB, they are only like $100) or you can even burn to a DVD if that is your thing and then another on the cloud, either Onedrive or google drive. The first time you lose a lot of data cause of a bad drive, you will always backup your backups. Also, if you have a drive you put data on and then disconnect from your PC, once a month you should connect it and let the drive spin up, there are oils in the mechanical drives that needs to move so it doesn't dry out. And you can buy whatever drive you want, but I always recommend WD, it seems everytime I come across a computer that is having an issue with it's hd, it is a seagate or Hitachi, or some other company. I do use different drives for my main OS drive, recently been using a Corsair 240GB SSD which has been great so far. So other companies do make good drives, but I only use them for my OS install and try not to keep many files on the main drive. This should help you not lose any important data and also if your OS drive fails and you have the majority of your programs installed to a second drive, you can just reinstall the OS and go right back to work without having to reinstall every single program you had on your PC. Good Luck!
Other reviewers have mentioned the tendency of this drive to slowly commit suicide by parking its head every 8 seconds, potentially wearing the drive out in as little as 6 months. Western Digital's official solution is to disable power management for the drive. That is a brain-dead non-solution because it is host-based. Linux users can use idle3-tools to increase head park delay in firmware or disable it completely. Do a google search to read more. I don't know what you're supposed to do if you have a mac. Buy seagate? Another very important point: this drive, like most in this size range, uses 4k sectors. That means that it is very important that your partitions are aligned to cylinder boundaries. Older partitioning tools like cfdisk do not handle this well. If you ... MoreOther reviewers have mentioned the tendency of this drive to slowly commit suicide by parking its head every 8 seconds, potentially wearing the drive out in as little as 6 months. Western Digital's official solution is to disable power management for the drive. That is a brain-dead non-solution because it is host-based. Linux users can use idle3-tools to increase head park delay in firmware or disable it completely. Do a google search to read more. I don't know what you're supposed to do if you have a mac. Buy seagate? Another very important point: this drive, like most in this size range, uses 4k sectors. That means that it is very important that your partitions are aligned to cylinder boundaries. Older partitioning tools like cfdisk do not handle this well. If you use gdisk and opt for a GPT partition table instead of MBR, gdisk will ensure that your partitions are aligned. If you just ignore the problem, your drive will perform poorly and you will lose approximately 11% of the capacity of the drive. I haven't had a hard drive this fussy since the days of jumpered PATA. The RMA for this faulty product is about $13. For that added cost, I may have been able to buy a more expensive drive with superior reviews. File this one under false economy.
"Because of the exceptional ratings on Newegg and everywhere else, and Google's research showing that hard drive quality and brand are not correlated, I decided to give WD another chance despite my previous bad experience with it. After all, I want to support an American and Californian brand in a tough market filled with foreign brands. And this is WD's high-end, elite class product. But this is what I got: countless hours spent retransfering data and troubleshooting problems and redoing all the work that wouldn't otherwise be necessary, which put me way behind my schedule, and not to mention the shoe leather cost of doing the returns. OK, I do want to give credit to WD's tech support, who promptly handled my ticket. They are doing a good job. But that is not ... More"Because of the exceptional ratings on Newegg and everywhere else, and Google's research showing that hard drive quality and brand are not correlated, I decided to give WD another chance despite my previous bad experience with it. After all, I want to support an American and Californian brand in a tough market filled with foreign brands. And this is WD's high-end, elite class product. But this is what I got: countless hours spent retransfering data and troubleshooting problems and redoing all the work that wouldn't otherwise be necessary, which put me way behind my schedule, and not to mention the shoe leather cost of doing the returns. OK, I do want to give credit to WD's tech support, who promptly handled my ticket. They are doing a good job. But that is not enough for me to change my overall impression with WD. Over the years, three hard drives (and the only three -- I am not going to try another) of different models, bought from different retailers (can't attribute it to Fedex's improper handling when I bought the hard drive from a local best buy), are all defective. 100% defect rate. The first one is a 80 GB WD passport bought several years ago at either best buy or Costco. I previously used it only once to backup data from old hard drives and then left it in a secure place, untouched for the rest of the time, and now it has bad blocks. Bad blocks after only one use. The second one is a WD Blue (WDBMYH5000ANC-NRSN) I bought last month at a local best buy. To summarize, it was unreadable in diskpart several times during the initial setup, and then frequently showed up in Win XP as unformatted (and subsequently would come back to normal). It twice caused the computer to boot into blue screen and then a quick restart, and it is louder than an electric razor--which I found out only after I took it out and ran it externally. Keep in mind that even if this is normal, it costs lots of energy to produce that kind of noise and this hard drive is for a mobile device. I have a detailed account of what happened in my best buy review -- just google by model number and look for the 1 star review. The third one is the WD black I am reviewing (WDC WD3200BEKT-75PVMT1)..." The drives disappearing isn't from the HDDs. It's most likely either a power issue or a Motherboard issue. You may want to look into that.
Been a WD customer for several years and so far any drive replacements have been smooth and have gone without a hitch, I purchased this particular model for a My Book Live DUO to replace 1 of the drives that went bad. It worked for a while but then problems arose and went to RMA the drive. In order to apply warranty the HD has to be registered in WD website, after this process the WD site said that my drive was out of region and had only a few days left of warranty even though it was 4 months old. I sent my proof of purchase and after a few days they finally updated the right warranty date and sent me a replacement which arrived DoA and was also the wrong model drive. I sent a 2nd RMA request and received a 2nd drive, this appears to be working so far. However... ... MoreBeen a WD customer for several years and so far any drive replacements have been smooth and have gone without a hitch, I purchased this particular model for a My Book Live DUO to replace 1 of the drives that went bad. It worked for a while but then problems arose and went to RMA the drive. In order to apply warranty the HD has to be registered in WD website, after this process the WD site said that my drive was out of region and had only a few days left of warranty even though it was 4 months old. I sent my proof of purchase and after a few days they finally updated the right warranty date and sent me a replacement which arrived DoA and was also the wrong model drive. I sent a 2nd RMA request and received a 2nd drive, this appears to be working so far. However... Now I received email saying: "Thank you for contacting Western Digital and we apologize for the inconvenience. Upon inspection of the drives returned under RMA, it was determined that the drives may have been altered and may not be eligible for replacement under WD’s limited warranty policy" It sounds they are trying to blame me for the faulty drive. We warned. WD Quality control and Quality Assurance are dropping several notches in a very snort period of time. They usually have had a commendable reputation but these last few weeks have been a pain.
| General | |
| Device Type | Hard drive - internal |
| Capacity | 1.5 TB |
| Form Factor | 3.5" x 1/3H |
| Interface | SATA 3Gb/s |
