PreS-Gr 2-Over the years, Hague has re-illustrated many texts that were in the public domain. A number of his books have given new life to overlooked work and have been widely appreciated. His reinterpretation of the work of Potter, however, is egregiously unnecessary. Potter wanted her books to be small enough for little hands to hold. Hague’s book is almost twice as large. Potter’s book has softly coloured spot illustrations, honing in beautifully on the drama or emotions of the facing pages of text. Hague’s art is overblown with extraneous details that threaten to overwhelm the plot. His rabbits with enormous eyes are reminiscent of those kitschy, large-eyed waifs popularised by the Keans in the 1960s. If Potter’s books were out of print, or in danger of becoming so, one might be more receptive to Hague’s version, but they are readily available and hard, if not impossible, to improve upon. Why try.-Miriam Lang Budin, Chappaqua Public Library, NYCopyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc. —This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.