Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. In making his case Ponech cogently presents the other major theoretical positions regarding documentary cinema and shows why each is incomplete. The result is a cutting-edge philosophical inquiry into purposiveness in film.
Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. In making his case Ponech cogently presents the other major theoretical positions regarding documentary cinema and shows why each is incomplete. The result is a cutting-edge philosophical inquiry into purposiveness in film.
in 3 offers
Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. In making his case Ponech cogently presents the other major theoretical positions regarding documentary cinema and shows why each is incomplete. The result is a cutting-edge philosophical inquiry into purposiveness in film.
Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. Trevor Ponech has written a serious and pathbreaking study of how to define non-fiction cinema. Working from the position that no cinematic representation is wholly factual Ponech argues that what determines whether a film is fiction or non-fiction is the filmmakers intention. Persuasively defending this unique position the author provides a philosophically rigorous analysis of the communicative practices of filmmakers. In making his case Ponech cogently presents the other major theoretical positions regarding documentary cinema and shows why each is incomplete. The result is a cutting-edge philosophical inquiry into purposiveness in film.
Year
Last updated at 30/09/2024 22:49:51
See 5 more history offers
available 6 months ago
Low stock
available about 1 year ago
Low stock
available over 1 year ago
Low stock
It Is What It IS, What Is It
$27.42 - $33.44
Compare 2 offers
Fiction - Board Game
$23.95 - $42.99
Compare 10 offers
originally posted on thatssofetch.com.au
originally posted on thatssofetch.com.au
originally posted on thatssofetch.com.au
Updated about 21 hours ago
See 5 more history offers