Kodak Pro Image 100 - 35mm - 36 Exposures
Kodak Pro Image 100 is a professional-grade 35mm colour film that delivers exceptional results for your holidays. With its fine grain and vibrant colours, this film captures the essence of your travels with stunning clarity and detail. Pro Image 35mm can cope with high heat and humidity better than the average film!
Kodak Pro Image 100 is a professional-grade 35mm colour film that delivers exceptional results for your holidays. With its fine grain and vibrant colours, this film captures the essence of your travels with stunning clarity and detail. Pro Image 35mm can cope with high heat and humidity better than the average film!
Kodak Pro Image 100 is a professional-grade 35mm colour film that delivers exceptional results for your holidays. With its fine grain and vibrant colours, this film captures the essence of your travels with stunning clarity and detail. Pro Image 35mm can cope with high heat and humidity better than the average film!
Kodak Pro Image 100 is a professional-grade 35mm colour film that delivers exceptional results for your holidays. With its fine grain and vibrant colours, this film captures the essence of your travels with stunning clarity and detail. Pro Image 35mm can cope with high heat and humidity better than the average film!
in 35 offers
The lowest price for Kodak Pro Image 100 - 35mm - 36 Exposures right now is $18.61 at pandacamera.com, compared across 26 retailers.
The all-time low was $8.00 on 31 Dec 2025 — today's price is 133% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 9 June 2026.
Last updated at 09/06/2026 20:41:38
Kodak Ektar 100 Professional ISO 100, 35mm, 36 Exposures, Colour Negative Film 2-Pack
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Professional Pro Image 100 - 36exp, 135/35mm Color Negative Film (Single Roll)
Delivery $12.43
Kodak Pro Image 100 (35mm) 36 Exp. EXPIRED 12/2025
Delivery between 16–24 June $59
Kodak Pro Image 100 35mm
Delivery $10
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 Colour Negative Film (35mm)
Delivery $9.50
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
5 Rolls Kodak Pro Image 100 Professional 35mm Film 6034466 Expires
Delivery $37.66
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Film Pro Image 100 Color Film (35mm 36 Exposures, 5-pack)
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures,
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 35mm
Delivery between 10–18 June $9.70
Kodak Pro Image 100 35mm Film
Delivery $10
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
I shot my first roll of Pro Image while back home in Cornwall. It's a gorgeous film when shot right. I think it looks more premium than Kodak Gold, but is more affordable than something like Portra. I like how the tones are quite muted; this isn't a film if you like punchy contrasts and vivid colours, more of a soft, gentle and cosy film. Using it in the evening on a beach was pretty much a perfect scenario for it. I shot these pictures on a Chinon CM-4s with 28mm Miranda lens.Overall, a solid, premium-feel film that I have bought more rolls of since shooting it for the first time.
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
In terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how ... MoreIn terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how evident the grain was at this ISO. Again, this may fit in very well if you're aiming for that particular look, but it may limit the general purpose usefulness of the film. I'd say that it's a bit too intrusive for landscapes, as it obscures some of the fine detail at large reproductions; Ektar presents a far better colour negative option for this purpose, at the same speed.The latitude seems less broad that its more pricey counterparts as well. I don't know whether it didn't benefit from the technological advances translated from the Vision3 cine films that so improved Portra, but it certainly feels that way. I found that I more readily lost highlight detail than I would using Portra 160, and so again it seems closer to Gold in this sense.I've seen it reported that the film is very robust, being able to tolerate higher temperatures for longer than other films. I didn't subject my rolls to such conditions, so I can't really comment on this, but it may present an advantage for travel if this is the case.I'm certainly not against any of the particular aspects described above; I think that the Gold aesthetic is wonderful for certain uses, and gives a very nostalgic feeling to images. However, I fear that Pro Image 100 loses out by falling in between the two price brackets. There seems to be a bigger step up in quality from this to Portra, than from Gold to this. If absolute quality is the aim, then there are certainly better choices for a bit more money. However, if you want the nostalgic Gold look, why not just shoot Gold?
originally posted on analoguewonderland.co.uk
I shot a roll of ProImage in dull light, It was nice a sunny when I left my house, but gradually got worse as my walk progressed. I was using my Minolta Dynax 500si in aperture priority with 35-70mm f4 macro lens and ended up shooting most of the roll wide open. All my shots were nicey exposed, despite the overcast sky making the light flatter than the Fens thanks to the excellent combination of camera and lens that brought the best from this film on the day.
| dimensions | 23.8 x 4.8 x 6.9 cm; 45.4 g |
Kodak Ektar 100 Professional ISO 100, 35mm, 36 Exposures, Colour Negative Film 2-Pack
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Professional Pro Image 100 - 36exp, 135/35mm Color Negative Film (Single Roll)
Delivery $12.43
Kodak Pro Image 100 (35mm) 36 Exp. EXPIRED 12/2025
Delivery between 16–24 June $59
Kodak Pro Image 100 35mm
Delivery $10
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Kodak Pro Image 100 Colour Negative Film (35mm)
Delivery $9.50
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
I shot my first roll of Pro Image while back home in Cornwall. It's a gorgeous film when shot right. I think it looks more premium than Kodak Gold, but is more affordable than something like Portra. I like how the tones are quite muted; this isn't a film if you like punchy contrasts and vivid colours, more of a soft, gentle and cosy film. Using it in the evening on a beach was pretty much a perfect scenario for it. I shot these pictures on a Chinon CM-4s with 28mm Miranda lens.Overall, a solid, premium-feel film that I have bought more rolls of since shooting it for the first time.
In terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how ... MoreIn terms of pricing, Kodak Pro Image 100 seems to occupy a position between the consumer Kodak films (ColorPlus, Gold) and the Professional line (Portra, Ektar etc.). From my experience, I'd say that the performance lies between these two categories as well.The colours are nicely saturated, but arguably lack the delicate tonal rendition of higher grade films; to my eye, it seems more on the consumer end of the spectrum in this sense. It does have the pleasing warmth of Gold, and so fits well into the "summer holiday" aesthetic, if that's what you're going for.In terms of grain, I find it to be on the heavier/more noticeable side for a 100 speed film. Perhaps my perspective has been warped by the remarkable performance of Ektar, but I was surprised to see how evident the grain was at this ISO. Again, this may fit in very well if you're aiming for that particular look, but it may limit the general purpose usefulness of the film. I'd say that it's a bit too intrusive for landscapes, as it obscures some of the fine detail at large reproductions; Ektar presents a far better colour negative option for this purpose, at the same speed.The latitude seems less broad that its more pricey counterparts as well. I don't know whether it didn't benefit from the technological advances translated from the Vision3 cine films that so improved Portra, but it certainly feels that way. I found that I more readily lost highlight detail than I would using Portra 160, and so again it seems closer to Gold in this sense.I've seen it reported that the film is very robust, being able to tolerate higher temperatures for longer than other films. I didn't subject my rolls to such conditions, so I can't really comment on this, but it may present an advantage for travel if this is the case.I'm certainly not against any of the particular aspects described above; I think that the Gold aesthetic is wonderful for certain uses, and gives a very nostalgic feeling to images. However, I fear that Pro Image 100 loses out by falling in between the two price brackets. There seems to be a bigger step up in quality from this to Portra, than from Gold to this. If absolute quality is the aim, then there are certainly better choices for a bit more money. However, if you want the nostalgic Gold look, why not just shoot Gold?
I shot a roll of ProImage in dull light, It was nice a sunny when I left my house, but gradually got worse as my walk progressed. I was using my Minolta Dynax 500si in aperture priority with 35-70mm f4 macro lens and ended up shooting most of the roll wide open. All my shots were nicey exposed, despite the overcast sky making the light flatter than the Fens thanks to the excellent combination of camera and lens that brought the best from this film on the day.
My preferred color film is Ektar that delivers those unique 'film colors' frame after frame with a grain so fine they seem digital. I now have a few rolls developed and scanned from a 5-pack of Pro Image 100. Both the Pro Image rolls have a very golden color, both shot in the hour+ directly after sunrise. The frames were scanned and edited in LR to lower the pronounced 'golden' color in the original scans. (I don't think film is 'done' just from being developed.) These Pro Image frames have very little grain and nice colors, seeming very much like digital. That lack of a distinct 'film look' might be one reason not to continue to use this film regularly. I shot a roll of Kodak Gold 200 at ISO-100 the same morning as these examples from Chicago. The results are ... MoreMy preferred color film is Ektar that delivers those unique 'film colors' frame after frame with a grain so fine they seem digital. I now have a few rolls developed and scanned from a 5-pack of Pro Image 100. Both the Pro Image rolls have a very golden color, both shot in the hour+ directly after sunrise. The frames were scanned and edited in LR to lower the pronounced 'golden' color in the original scans. (I don't think film is 'done' just from being developed.) These Pro Image frames have very little grain and nice colors, seeming very much like digital. That lack of a distinct 'film look' might be one reason not to continue to use this film regularly. I shot a roll of Kodak Gold 200 at ISO-100 the same morning as these examples from Chicago. The results are virtually identical, including the golden color. If selecting films based on results and cost, recognize the cost for the Gold buys 6 rolls for slightly less than 5 of Pro Image.B&H delivered quick and easy as always.
Great film for all round good light photography. Exceptional colours the saturation is just right. Great for landscapes, portraits and studio work. I develop myself and have got nothing but great results even when my chemicals were probably past their best. Will defiantly be buying more.
ExperienceUnlike the Kodak Color Plus 200, which, although it liked the warm lamp image, but resembles an Instagram filter, the Kodak Pro Image 100 gives a thoroughbred cinematic color. All questions about the professionalism of this film disappear as soon as you see the first photos.The Kodak Pro Image 100 gives slightly muted colors. In general, the film gives a purplish-brown tinting. If you do not like this color, take it in Photoshop to a warmer blue and get an equally impressive result.Special attention should be paid to how this emulsion beats the red color. The red fades to a cold pink, sometimes cold coral. I can't imagine how you can simulate the color of a Kodak Pro Image 100 in an editor. It seems to me that you need to do a lot of magic. And here ... MoreExperienceUnlike the Kodak Color Plus 200, which, although it liked the warm lamp image, but resembles an Instagram filter, the Kodak Pro Image 100 gives a thoroughbred cinematic color. All questions about the professionalism of this film disappear as soon as you see the first photos.The Kodak Pro Image 100 gives slightly muted colors. In general, the film gives a purplish-brown tinting. If you do not like this color, take it in Photoshop to a warmer blue and get an equally impressive result.Special attention should be paid to how this emulsion beats the red color. The red fades to a cold pink, sometimes cold coral. I can't imagine how you can simulate the color of a Kodak Pro Image 100 in an editor. It seems to me that you need to do a lot of magic. And here it comes out of the box.The Kodak Pro Image 100 is not afraid of the sun at all. The midday contrast plays out perfectly: no highlights and bottomless shadows. The dynamic range is excellent.In order to achieve such a smooth lighting on the figure in the sun-drenched areas and at the same time not lose face in the shade, I will need a Fujifilm X-T3. It is possible to programmatically extend the dynamic range. But the result, to be honest, will be disgusting to look at. Because the wider the dynamic range the Fuji pulls, the more it distorts the color.About the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II, not even necessary to say. It will either whiten the lights or lose the shadows. With Canon, you will have to glue the HDR in Photoshop. With even hands, you can achieve more or less even illumination over the area of the frame. But the color itself will not come, spend time also on toning.And the camera comes from the last century + Kodak Pro Image 100 without the slightest effort, not only give the perfect light, but also process the default cinematic photo!ConclusionThe Kodak Pro Image 100 fully justifies belonging to the family of professional photographic films. If you get your hands on shooting several Kodak Pro Image 100 videos in different conditions, you can predict the result in any scene. And play with it.I think the Kodak Pro Image 100 is best suited for you when the final photo should look like a frame from a movie. Build a scene like a movie, use suitable costumes and decorate the frame.
Need to shoot some more of this but I'm not sure what to make of it after my test roll. In some situations/exposures it ends up really warm, to the point where the classic Kodak yellow/orange tint takes away from the clarity of the shot, and in others the blacks on this are really intense and can make darker blues look a bit strange. It doesn't seem particularly sharp on my test roll, even with my Nikkor-S 50mm 1.4 which can normally cut sheet metal. However there is also a 'goldilocks zone' where this film really excells.I think the bottom line is it prefers to be slightly overexposed, but never when facing harsh light.So what to make of it? It deserves to be given more of a chance, but for now I've pigeonholed it as less versatile/more expensive/easier to get ... MoreNeed to shoot some more of this but I'm not sure what to make of it after my test roll. In some situations/exposures it ends up really warm, to the point where the classic Kodak yellow/orange tint takes away from the clarity of the shot, and in others the blacks on this are really intense and can make darker blues look a bit strange. It doesn't seem particularly sharp on my test roll, even with my Nikkor-S 50mm 1.4 which can normally cut sheet metal. However there is also a 'goldilocks zone' where this film really excells.I think the bottom line is it prefers to be slightly overexposed, but never when facing harsh light.So what to make of it? It deserves to be given more of a chance, but for now I've pigeonholed it as less versatile/more expensive/easier to get hold of than ColorPlus(my yardstick against which all other film is measured), BUT can give results similar to Portra for much less money in certain situations.
Shot my first roll of this on a grey December day using a Zeiss Icon Contaflex Super, relying on it's (ancient and quirky) metering system, so exposures were "probably within a stop or so".There's plenty of sharpness, with just enough smooth grain to say "this ain't digital" and natural rendition of the colours from the dull day without looking washed out. The one splash of red when the car passed suggests that it would cope equally well with more vibrant scenes and I look forward to trying it on something less rural when I have the chance!I was a little concerned that the 100 speed would be restrictive, but that was just the voice in my head that's got used to "faster is better" talking. For years most of us used to shoot 100 as the "standard" speed in 35mm, ... MoreShot my first roll of this on a grey December day using a Zeiss Icon Contaflex Super, relying on it's (ancient and quirky) metering system, so exposures were "probably within a stop or so".There's plenty of sharpness, with just enough smooth grain to say "this ain't digital" and natural rendition of the colours from the dull day without looking washed out. The one splash of red when the car passed suggests that it would cope equally well with more vibrant scenes and I look forward to trying it on something less rural when I have the chance!I was a little concerned that the 100 speed would be restrictive, but that was just the voice in my head that's got used to "faster is better" talking. For years most of us used to shoot 100 as the "standard" speed in 35mm, 200 was impressive and 400 was "wow!". Light, film, and chemistry haven't changed, only our expectations. Don't let "a bit slow" put you offPossibly not one for people who like technicolour dreams but, if you like your memories to match what was actually there at the time, this film is certainly worth trying out. My list of "well suited for" probably isn't complete. I can only judge by what I've shot so far with it and the overall impression of ease of use, but suspect it would be competent for pretty much anything except low light.Shot at box speed and developed in Cinestill C41 chemistry, the results were easy to scan - examples have nothing done in post .
I bought a brick of this during the pandemic along with Fuji C200, and thought it might offer an alternative to those cool tones. However, I reckon Kodak Pro Image 100 is a subtle film, with muted tones and moderate contrast. It does not like underexposure at all, and your pictures could end up very muddy. I prefer punchier films, and this is not one of them. The ISO 100 speed makes using it limited to daylight or sunny weather. In my examples it was overcast (in Manchester, shocker...) and the results are a bit grainier and on the edge of being underexposed. I would probably recommend rating at EI50 if you can, and give this film more light so you stand a chance of less grain. Overall it's not my style, but could be suited to others if you prefer its look.Example ... MoreI bought a brick of this during the pandemic along with Fuji C200, and thought it might offer an alternative to those cool tones. However, I reckon Kodak Pro Image 100 is a subtle film, with muted tones and moderate contrast. It does not like underexposure at all, and your pictures could end up very muddy. I prefer punchier films, and this is not one of them. The ISO 100 speed makes using it limited to daylight or sunny weather. In my examples it was overcast (in Manchester, shocker...) and the results are a bit grainier and on the edge of being underexposed. I would probably recommend rating at EI50 if you can, and give this film more light so you stand a chance of less grain. Overall it's not my style, but could be suited to others if you prefer its look.Example images taken on Minolta 7000i at EI100.
This film is criminally underrated. An excellent choice for someone who wants a good professional film stock that's cheaper than something like Portra. This film has very good colors and crisp photos and also handles being stored in warmer environments very well. Couldn't recommend it enough
| dimensions | 23.8 x 4.8 x 6.9 cm; 45.4 g |
