Incorporating multi-material, such as magnesium. The best balance of portability and durability required by professional photographers With 3 FLD glass elements and 1 SLD glass element, it ensures the uncompromising image quality as a member of the Sigma sports line family. Intelligent OS adopting the last algorithm enables it to deliver an image stabilization effect of 4 stops.
Incorporating multi-material, such as magnesium. The best balance of portability and durability required by professional photographers With 3 FLD glass elements and 1 SLD glass element, it ensures the uncompromising image quality as a member of the Sigma sports line family. Intelligent OS adopting the last algorithm enables it to deliver an image stabilization effect of 4 stops.
in 3 offers
The lowest price for Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports Lens For Sigma SA, Full Frame Lenses, Zoom, Telephoto Focus Autofocus, Image right now is $2,938.32 at Camera-Warehouse, compared across 3 retailers.
The all-time low was $1,491.03 on 10 Mar 2026 â today's price is 97% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before â worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 29 June 2026.
Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports Lens For Sigma SA, Full Frame Lenses, Zoom, Telephoto Focus Autofocus, Image
Incorporating multi-material, such as magnesium. The best balance of portability and durability required by professional photographers With 3 FLD glass elements and 1 SLD glass element, it ensures the uncompromising image quality as a member of the Sigma sports line family. Intelligent OS adopting the last algorithm enables it to deliver an image stabilization effect of 4 stops.
Incorporating multi-material, such as magnesium. The best balance of portability and durability required by professional photographers With 3 FLD glass elements and 1 SLD glass element, it ensures the uncompromising image quality as a member of the Sigma sports line family. Intelligent OS adopting the last algorithm enables it to deliver an image stabilization effect of 4 stops.
Last updated at 29/06/2026 23:32:51
Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports Lens for Sigma SA
Free delivery between 2â9 July
Sigma 60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports Lens (Sigma)
Delivery $43.55
Sigma 60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG DN OS for L-Mount (Renewed)
Delivery between 6â9 July $29
originally posted on adorama.com
I purchased this lens right before the safari trips to Africa and boy this lens did not disappoint me. It's a fantastic lens for someone looking to have a wide range of focal length in one body. I never needed to change my lens in the dusty environment and I was easily able to shoot both landscapes and wildlife. Skeptics will say this is a very slow lens. However, I'd argue that one mostly shoots wildlife in broad daylight. I was able to shoot at high shutter speeds and widest apertures without needing to crank up my ISO. Also, most of the wildlife is pretty far away. So the background noise regardless gets masked down, making your subject stand out pretty well. Moreover, I have a Sigma 150-600 DG DN that I used for almost 9 months now. I'd say the performance of ... MoreI purchased this lens right before the safari trips to Africa and boy this lens did not disappoint me. It's a fantastic lens for someone looking to have a wide range of focal length in one body. I never needed to change my lens in the dusty environment and I was easily able to shoot both landscapes and wildlife. Skeptics will say this is a very slow lens. However, I'd argue that one mostly shoots wildlife in broad daylight. I was able to shoot at high shutter speeds and widest apertures without needing to crank up my ISO. Also, most of the wildlife is pretty far away. So the background noise regardless gets masked down, making your subject stand out pretty well. Moreover, I have a Sigma 150-600 DG DN that I used for almost 9 months now. I'd say the performance of the new lens is equivalent if not better. The only downside is that it's a very heavy lens. You won't be able to shoot handheld for a long time and a support would be needed.
originally posted on lensrentals.com
First-timer here. The sign-up/registration and overall rental experience was excellent. I did not have to interact with customer service at all. Thus, it's hard to "grade" customer service. That being said, email updates concerning the rental process helped me stay on track. The lens itself arrived in very good condition and in a hard case. I took the lens to an airshow, but the results were not optimal. It could indeed have been "user error." This is not a review of the lens - I have seen plenty of good-quality photos, but I found the focus to be rather soft on my 90D. I did not get the USB thingamaggiga. So, maybe that was a mistake on my part. Not sure if the lens was set for a much different body - which contributed to my soft focus. This was my first experience ... MoreFirst-timer here. The sign-up/registration and overall rental experience was excellent. I did not have to interact with customer service at all. Thus, it's hard to "grade" customer service. That being said, email updates concerning the rental process helped me stay on track. The lens itself arrived in very good condition and in a hard case. I took the lens to an airshow, but the results were not optimal. It could indeed have been "user error." This is not a review of the lens - I have seen plenty of good-quality photos, but I found the focus to be rather soft on my 90D. I did not get the USB thingamaggiga. So, maybe that was a mistake on my part. Not sure if the lens was set for a much different body - which contributed to my soft focus. This was my first experience with a Sigma lens. Again, this is not a review on the lens itself. Perhaps, a recommendation for future renters is to rent the additional hardware to update/setup the lens when you get it.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
The Short - its a great lens and I do recommend it for use on the Z9 for birds and wildlife. I love shooting variable zoom and this is almost perfect.The Long - I own the Z70-200 f2.8 and it is incredible - sharp, fast and virtually every shot turns out, literally PERFECT! However it is not long enough for the majority of wildlife and bird photo opportunities I encounter around home and I did not want to wait any longer for the new fixed Z lens to ship or the desired Z200-600 to go into production.The Good - In bright light its fantastic, works great with the Z9 focus system and the images are sharp. I am a pixel peeking perfectionist who does not edit and the low light photos are good and getting better. Only owned the lens for a week and am rapidly improving ... MoreThe Short - its a great lens and I do recommend it for use on the Z9 for birds and wildlife. I love shooting variable zoom and this is almost perfect.The Long - I own the Z70-200 f2.8 and it is incredible - sharp, fast and virtually every shot turns out, literally PERFECT! However it is not long enough for the majority of wildlife and bird photo opportunities I encounter around home and I did not want to wait any longer for the new fixed Z lens to ship or the desired Z200-600 to go into production.The Good - In bright light its fantastic, works great with the Z9 focus system and the images are sharp. I am a pixel peeking perfectionist who does not edit and the low light photos are good and getting better. Only owned the lens for a week and am rapidly improving the low light photos since the Z9 higher ISO is incredible.The Bad - Comparing it to the 70-200 and my F mount 300mm f2.8 the Sigma lens is a little softer during golden hour and soft at twilight. I am confident they could easily sharpened in editing to be crystal clear. The focus is as fast as the F mount but slower the the Z mount, but all are really fast in my opinion and stick to the subject the same. The slight dip in performance should not be a shocking revelation for anyone as I'm comparing it to a Nikkor S line f2.8 lens. Also, It is every bit as heavy as advertised. I shoot RAW photos that I couldn't upload so unfortunately the examples are screenshots relay what is I just explained.The Ugly - I already own the Tamron 150-600's. The G1 version has been fantastic for me and my go to lens on the D500 the last five years but does not work with the Z9 autofocus. That being said I would give the Sigma the edge in comparison. The G2 version images have only been ok and not up to my standards on several other camera bodies and did not improve with the Z9.
| Focal Length | 60 to 600mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/4.5 to 6.3 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 to 32 |
| Lens Mount | Sigma SA |
| Lens Format Coverage | Full-Frame |
Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports Lens for Sigma SA
Free delivery between 2â9 July
Sigma 60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports Lens (Sigma)
Delivery $43.55
Sigma 60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG DN OS for L-Mount (Renewed)
Delivery between 6â9 July $29
I purchased this lens right before the safari trips to Africa and boy this lens did not disappoint me. It's a fantastic lens for someone looking to have a wide range of focal length in one body. I never needed to change my lens in the dusty environment and I was easily able to shoot both landscapes and wildlife. Skeptics will say this is a very slow lens. However, I'd argue that one mostly shoots wildlife in broad daylight. I was able to shoot at high shutter speeds and widest apertures without needing to crank up my ISO. Also, most of the wildlife is pretty far away. So the background noise regardless gets masked down, making your subject stand out pretty well. Moreover, I have a Sigma 150-600 DG DN that I used for almost 9 months now. I'd say the performance of ... MoreI purchased this lens right before the safari trips to Africa and boy this lens did not disappoint me. It's a fantastic lens for someone looking to have a wide range of focal length in one body. I never needed to change my lens in the dusty environment and I was easily able to shoot both landscapes and wildlife. Skeptics will say this is a very slow lens. However, I'd argue that one mostly shoots wildlife in broad daylight. I was able to shoot at high shutter speeds and widest apertures without needing to crank up my ISO. Also, most of the wildlife is pretty far away. So the background noise regardless gets masked down, making your subject stand out pretty well. Moreover, I have a Sigma 150-600 DG DN that I used for almost 9 months now. I'd say the performance of the new lens is equivalent if not better. The only downside is that it's a very heavy lens. You won't be able to shoot handheld for a long time and a support would be needed.
First-timer here. The sign-up/registration and overall rental experience was excellent. I did not have to interact with customer service at all. Thus, it's hard to "grade" customer service. That being said, email updates concerning the rental process helped me stay on track. The lens itself arrived in very good condition and in a hard case. I took the lens to an airshow, but the results were not optimal. It could indeed have been "user error." This is not a review of the lens - I have seen plenty of good-quality photos, but I found the focus to be rather soft on my 90D. I did not get the USB thingamaggiga. So, maybe that was a mistake on my part. Not sure if the lens was set for a much different body - which contributed to my soft focus. This was my first experience ... MoreFirst-timer here. The sign-up/registration and overall rental experience was excellent. I did not have to interact with customer service at all. Thus, it's hard to "grade" customer service. That being said, email updates concerning the rental process helped me stay on track. The lens itself arrived in very good condition and in a hard case. I took the lens to an airshow, but the results were not optimal. It could indeed have been "user error." This is not a review of the lens - I have seen plenty of good-quality photos, but I found the focus to be rather soft on my 90D. I did not get the USB thingamaggiga. So, maybe that was a mistake on my part. Not sure if the lens was set for a much different body - which contributed to my soft focus. This was my first experience with a Sigma lens. Again, this is not a review on the lens itself. Perhaps, a recommendation for future renters is to rent the additional hardware to update/setup the lens when you get it.
The Short - its a great lens and I do recommend it for use on the Z9 for birds and wildlife. I love shooting variable zoom and this is almost perfect.The Long - I own the Z70-200 f2.8 and it is incredible - sharp, fast and virtually every shot turns out, literally PERFECT! However it is not long enough for the majority of wildlife and bird photo opportunities I encounter around home and I did not want to wait any longer for the new fixed Z lens to ship or the desired Z200-600 to go into production.The Good - In bright light its fantastic, works great with the Z9 focus system and the images are sharp. I am a pixel peeking perfectionist who does not edit and the low light photos are good and getting better. Only owned the lens for a week and am rapidly improving ... MoreThe Short - its a great lens and I do recommend it for use on the Z9 for birds and wildlife. I love shooting variable zoom and this is almost perfect.The Long - I own the Z70-200 f2.8 and it is incredible - sharp, fast and virtually every shot turns out, literally PERFECT! However it is not long enough for the majority of wildlife and bird photo opportunities I encounter around home and I did not want to wait any longer for the new fixed Z lens to ship or the desired Z200-600 to go into production.The Good - In bright light its fantastic, works great with the Z9 focus system and the images are sharp. I am a pixel peeking perfectionist who does not edit and the low light photos are good and getting better. Only owned the lens for a week and am rapidly improving the low light photos since the Z9 higher ISO is incredible.The Bad - Comparing it to the 70-200 and my F mount 300mm f2.8 the Sigma lens is a little softer during golden hour and soft at twilight. I am confident they could easily sharpened in editing to be crystal clear. The focus is as fast as the F mount but slower the the Z mount, but all are really fast in my opinion and stick to the subject the same. The slight dip in performance should not be a shocking revelation for anyone as I'm comparing it to a Nikkor S line f2.8 lens. Also, It is every bit as heavy as advertised. I shoot RAW photos that I couldn't upload so unfortunately the examples are screenshots relay what is I just explained.The Ugly - I already own the Tamron 150-600's. The G1 version has been fantastic for me and my go to lens on the D500 the last five years but does not work with the Z9 autofocus. That being said I would give the Sigma the edge in comparison. The G2 version images have only been ok and not up to my standards on several other camera bodies and did not improve with the Z9.
The Sigma 60-600m for the Sony EF mount is a fantastic Swiss Army type lens. The lens is very sharp, controls are easy to operate, build quality is rock solid, focus is lighting fast, and the focal range makes it invaluable to have for sports/wild life. If you plan on shooting video with this lens remember it is varifocal. While zooming this lens will not re-acquire focus. As long as you keep that in mind, make your zoom adjustments when action is not taking place, this lens will not let you down. While it is not a fast lens (4.5 at its fastest), most of that can be overcome by the dynamic range of the Sony camera and it is much more affordable than fast aperture telephoto lenses. For me, I had to make the decision to either buy this lens and use one camera body, ... MoreThe Sigma 60-600m for the Sony EF mount is a fantastic Swiss Army type lens. The lens is very sharp, controls are easy to operate, build quality is rock solid, focus is lighting fast, and the focal range makes it invaluable to have for sports/wild life. If you plan on shooting video with this lens remember it is varifocal. While zooming this lens will not re-acquire focus. As long as you keep that in mind, make your zoom adjustments when action is not taking place, this lens will not let you down. While it is not a fast lens (4.5 at its fastest), most of that can be overcome by the dynamic range of the Sony camera and it is much more affordable than fast aperture telephoto lenses. For me, I had to make the decision to either buy this lens and use one camera body, or, buy another body and use two separate lenses. I made the decision to go for this lens, sacrifice 1 1/3 stops of light at the wide end of the lens, and keep things light and simple with just one camera body. Hope this helps.
Have used this lens for long distance bird photography with the Canon D5 Mk IV and the Canon R5, with adapter. Results at 600mm wide open were spotty, needing strong lighting, and definitely unusable with the Sigma 1.4 extender. However, stopped down to f/8, which I admit is my go-to aperture for most shooting, it produced outstanding results whatever the zoom setting. and even, if to a slightly lesser degree, with the 1.4 extender. My best shots in this 100 yd+ shooting setting are still with the Canon 300 L Mk II + 1.4 extender, but that's at a huge financial penalty, and of course I lose the zoom flexibility so vital for many outdoor and sports challenges. Fast autofocus with either camera, but especially with the R5's eye-identification focus feature. I have the ... MoreHave used this lens for long distance bird photography with the Canon D5 Mk IV and the Canon R5, with adapter. Results at 600mm wide open were spotty, needing strong lighting, and definitely unusable with the Sigma 1.4 extender. However, stopped down to f/8, which I admit is my go-to aperture for most shooting, it produced outstanding results whatever the zoom setting. and even, if to a slightly lesser degree, with the 1.4 extender. My best shots in this 100 yd+ shooting setting are still with the Canon 300 L Mk II + 1.4 extender, but that's at a huge financial penalty, and of course I lose the zoom flexibility so vital for many outdoor and sports challenges. Fast autofocus with either camera, but especially with the R5's eye-identification focus feature. I have the Canon 100-400 L Mk II, but it's packed away since I got used to this Sigma. Heavy yes, but at my age (73) I use a monopod for most mobile location shooting anyway. With the Wimberly MH-100 mono-head on a sturdy monopod, easy to carry and lock onto elusive prey.
I bought this lens after doing a photo safari in Botswana where all the guides were using Sigma's 150-600. They recommended this lens to me. Sorry sigma, it is not a good lens.I just returned from a 5 week trip to Africa. This was the only lens I took. What I am realizing from my experience:1. The lens is extremely heavy. Hand-holding this lens for any length of time requires upper body strength that I simply do not have. Holding it in position to wait for 'the shot' (the kingfisher to fly, the cheetah to pounce) is essentially impossible.2. The lens does not have sharp focus beyond about 400 mm zoom. I am having to do a lot of sharpening in lightroom and Topaz. I am the type of photographer that wants a good image from the camera, and one that does not ... MoreI bought this lens after doing a photo safari in Botswana where all the guides were using Sigma's 150-600. They recommended this lens to me. Sorry sigma, it is not a good lens.I just returned from a 5 week trip to Africa. This was the only lens I took. What I am realizing from my experience:1. The lens is extremely heavy. Hand-holding this lens for any length of time requires upper body strength that I simply do not have. Holding it in position to wait for 'the shot' (the kingfisher to fly, the cheetah to pounce) is essentially impossible.2. The lens does not have sharp focus beyond about 400 mm zoom. I am having to do a lot of sharpening in lightroom and Topaz. I am the type of photographer that wants a good image from the camera, and one that does not require a lot of artificial processing afterwards.3. The lens works only when there is a significant amount of light. Because of a strangely extended rainy season this year, there were many cloudy days on the trip. The best I could get was an ISO of 12,800. Topaz did not clean up the noise to my satisfaction. The only shots I am happy with are those that came in the mid afternoon when the sun was out. Forget about using this lens in the morning or late afternoon (which is typically when the critters are more active).I wish I did not sell my Canon 400mm lens to buy this lens. If I could, I would switch back immediately.
probaly it would be a good lens overall but i received a soft copyim testing since 5 days but my results are not as sharp as my contemporary lens.thought things will improve and they are gone worseidk why sigma does this,previously my contemporary was sharp where as other users use to complainnow my 60-600mm sports is soft af and reviews says its sharpso basically sigma is not doing good Quality test.overall BH photovideo did good time delivery ,no complains but very disappointed that i was switching to sony 200-600mm but got this insteadand now stuck with delivery options n return as i reside in middleeast.
First off, let me say I LOVE the lens, BUT, being part of the geezer brigade I maybe should have paid more attention to the mag reviews of said lens. I met the UPS driver on the street due to my excitement at receiving a new âtoyâ and it took him a bit of time to find the product on the van. When I mentioned âcamera lensâ, he was looking for a smallish to mid-size box, not one the size of a dorm room refrigerator! I signed and he handed me the box which almost dislocated my shoulders from the weight. Didnât think to bring out a hand truck. Oh wellâŠâŠ sadly, I may have to start membership at a gym or court club to âbeefâ up to pack my new lens around. I also failed to read the fine print to see if it came with âtraining wheelsâ! On the plus side, the lens cap could be ... MoreFirst off, let me say I LOVE the lens, BUT, being part of the geezer brigade I maybe should have paid more attention to the mag reviews of said lens. I met the UPS driver on the street due to my excitement at receiving a new âtoyâ and it took him a bit of time to find the product on the van. When I mentioned âcamera lensâ, he was looking for a smallish to mid-size box, not one the size of a dorm room refrigerator! I signed and he handed me the box which almost dislocated my shoulders from the weight. Didnât think to bring out a hand truck. Oh wellâŠâŠ sadly, I may have to start membership at a gym or court club to âbeefâ up to pack my new lens around. I also failed to read the fine print to see if it came with âtraining wheelsâ! On the plus side, the lens cap could be used as a salad plate at the pizza buffet or a nice rain cap in inclement weather. Sun shade comes to mind too. On the down side but by no means a deal breaker, Sigma uses just the opposite rotation for zoom as my Sony and Tamron lenses. Now this may be due to the fact that Sony has always been âout of whackâ from every other camera in the universe for settings, dials etc. Again, being a geezer with no memory it matters naught in the long run. If I am taking pictures of the sunrise, I have to start setting up at around midnight and pray that I am ready by dawns early light. Itâs tough on an old man to take two pictures, take a nap, take two pictures, nap!!! Hopefully the gym workouts will bump me up to three pics before nap time. Many thanks to Pictureline for their wonderful prices and fast shipping on great products.
I wanted to like this lens. I was hoping it may be a less expensive alternative to the Canon EF 100-400, but alas, no.. This thing is much bigger and heavier than I anticipated. I could live with that, however, I'm shooting high-school lacrosse, constantly zooming in and out and the zoom ring is incredibly stiff, in part due to the weight of the elements in the front of the lens. I found it easier to grab the enormous lens hood and push-and-pull the lens instead of using the ring. In addition, the focusing speed was noticeably slower (had far more blurry shots than I'm used to) and the highlights were completely blown out in many, many shots - no matter what I changed my settings to (I shoot in manual). I would only recommend this lens to someone shooting fairly ... MoreI wanted to like this lens. I was hoping it may be a less expensive alternative to the Canon EF 100-400, but alas, no.. This thing is much bigger and heavier than I anticipated. I could live with that, however, I'm shooting high-school lacrosse, constantly zooming in and out and the zoom ring is incredibly stiff, in part due to the weight of the elements in the front of the lens. I found it easier to grab the enormous lens hood and push-and-pull the lens instead of using the ring. In addition, the focusing speed was noticeably slower (had far more blurry shots than I'm used to) and the highlights were completely blown out in many, many shots - no matter what I changed my settings to (I shoot in manual). I would only recommend this lens to someone shooting fairly stationary objects who really needs/wants 600mm. In all fairness, I was shooting on a crop-sensor (90d), however, I virtually never ran it out to 600, that would be crazy (960mm). I would have liked to see what this lens does on a full-frame body (I don't currently have on...;-)
I usually rent the Nikkor 200-400 f/4 for Chicago's Air & Water show, but this year I wanted more reach with a little less cost because I wasn't sure how much time I'd be bale to dedicate to shooting over the weekend of my rental. For an air show, the zoom range was great. If/when the planes got too close I could zoom out from 600mm to frame them nicely. The sharpness was decent. When you're tracking jets flying 300-600+mph a tiny bit of motion blur - even with an extremely fast shutter - can masquerade as softness. The softness in a few photos did give me a good excuse to try Topaz Labs' AI sharpening software a try and I was blown away by it. Long story short, the lens is plenty sharp for Topaz Labs to make the resulting photos pin point tack sharp. But back to ... MoreI usually rent the Nikkor 200-400 f/4 for Chicago's Air & Water show, but this year I wanted more reach with a little less cost because I wasn't sure how much time I'd be bale to dedicate to shooting over the weekend of my rental. For an air show, the zoom range was great. If/when the planes got too close I could zoom out from 600mm to frame them nicely. The sharpness was decent. When you're tracking jets flying 300-600+mph a tiny bit of motion blur - even with an extremely fast shutter - can masquerade as softness. The softness in a few photos did give me a good excuse to try Topaz Labs' AI sharpening software a try and I was blown away by it. Long story short, the lens is plenty sharp for Topaz Labs to make the resulting photos pin point tack sharp. But back to the lens. For an air show the auto-focus is a bit slow. And I didn't like that it doesn't have a focus memory button. On the Nikkor I previously used, I could set a focus memory button - I'd set it to infinity - so I could easily find the airplanes farther out to continually track them as they got closer to show center before engaging the AF. With this lens, I found the the AF would hunt for focus - and if I momentarily looked away to focus on something distant it would take me a few seconds to find/lock back onto the plane which caused me to miss some shots - thankfully none of the critical ones! Overall I liked the zoom range and was pleased with the sharpness, but the AF speed and lack of a focus memory button was a con of this lens used in this application.
| Focal Length | 60 to 600mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/4.5 to 6.3 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 to 32 |
| Lens Mount | Sigma SA |
| Lens Format Coverage | Full-Frame |
