Product Description PRE-ORDER NOW! Continuing to push the boundaries of medium format, the GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera from FUJIFILM provides users utmost control and allows for capturing the finest details within a frame. Utilizing a newly developed 102MP CMOS II sensor with the X-Processor 5, wide dynamic range is ensured as well as a vast sensitivity range of ISO 80-12800. While an upgraded 5.76m-dot EVF provides bright eye-level viewing, a rear 3.2" three-way tilting touchscreen LCD opens up new perspectives to shoot from. Ultrahigh resolution, 4k video recording, and a plethora of impressive camera features establish the GFX 100S II as an all-around powerhouse primed for copious shooting applications.
Product Description PRE-ORDER NOW! Continuing to push the boundaries of medium format, the GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera from FUJIFILM provides users utmost control and allows for capturing the finest details within a frame. Utilizing a newly developed 102MP CMOS II sensor with the X-Processor 5, wide dynamic range is ensured as well as a vast sensitivity range of ISO 80-12800. While an upgraded 5.76m-dot EVF provides bright eye-level viewing, a rear 3.2" three-way tilting touchscreen LCD opens up new perspectives to shoot from. Ultrahigh resolution, 4k video recording, and a plethora of impressive camera features establish the GFX 100S II as an all-around powerhouse primed for copious shooting applications.
in 34 offers
Product Description PRE-ORDER NOW! Continuing to push the boundaries of medium format, the GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera from FUJIFILM provides users utmost control and allows for capturing the finest details within a frame. Utilizing a newly developed 102MP CMOS II sensor with the X-Processor 5, wide dynamic range is ensured as well as a vast sensitivity range of ISO 80-12800. While an upgraded 5.76m-dot EVF provides bright eye-level viewing, a rear 3.2" three-way tilting touchscreen LCD opens up new perspectives to shoot from. Ultrahigh resolution, 4k video recording, and a plethora of impressive camera features establish the GFX 100S II as an all-around powerhouse primed for copious shooting applications.
Product Description PRE-ORDER NOW! Continuing to push the boundaries of medium format, the GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera from FUJIFILM provides users utmost control and allows for capturing the finest details within a frame. Utilizing a newly developed 102MP CMOS II sensor with the X-Processor 5, wide dynamic range is ensured as well as a vast sensitivity range of ISO 80-12800. While an upgraded 5.76m-dot EVF provides bright eye-level viewing, a rear 3.2" three-way tilting touchscreen LCD opens up new perspectives to shoot from. Ultrahigh resolution, 4k video recording, and a plethora of impressive camera features establish the GFX 100S II as an all-around powerhouse primed for copious shooting applications.
Last updated at 07/06/2026 07:37:55
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera by Onestop Digital
Free delivery between 12–17 June
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera (Body only)
Free delivery between 12–19 June
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Pro Mirrorless Body
14-day returns
Fujifilm GFX 100S II + GF 20-35mm Kit
14-day returns
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera Body
Delivery $192
FUJIFILM GFX 100s II
Delivery $15
FUJIFILM GFX 100S II Medium Format Digital Camera with GF 100-200mm f/5.6 Lens
Delivery $15
FUJIFILM GFX 100S II Medium Format Digital Camera with GF 45-100mm f/4 Lens
Delivery $15
FUJIFILM GFX 100S II Medium Format Digital Camera with GF 55mm f/1.7 Lens
Delivery $15
FUJIFILM GFX 100S II Medium Format Digital Camera with GF 20-35mm f/4 Lens
Delivery $15
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
If you are thinking of jumping into Fuji medium format I would bypass the GFX 50X cameras. I owned the 50R and sold it. Image quality was ok, but stopping down was necessary. Aliasing and moire plagued images with fine detail. It was found in weathered wood, telephone poles, power lines, tree trunks, etc. Another problem with those sensors were the spots at small apertures. They showed up in even tones like veiled water, open sky, or clouds. If I had to use f16 or f22, I would be spotting hundreds of spots that could not be removed with cleaning. Test your cameras. The 50SII I purchased, but ultimately returned, had the same issues. Once you see them, you can’t unsee them.I decided to take the plunge on this camera. I tested it for the same issues and the sensor ... MoreIf you are thinking of jumping into Fuji medium format I would bypass the GFX 50X cameras. I owned the 50R and sold it. Image quality was ok, but stopping down was necessary. Aliasing and moire plagued images with fine detail. It was found in weathered wood, telephone poles, power lines, tree trunks, etc. Another problem with those sensors were the spots at small apertures. They showed up in even tones like veiled water, open sky, or clouds. If I had to use f16 or f22, I would be spotting hundreds of spots that could not be removed with cleaning. Test your cameras. The 50SII I purchased, but ultimately returned, had the same issues. Once you see them, you can’t unsee them.I decided to take the plunge on this camera. I tested it for the same issues and the sensor was clean. This camera is not free of moire and aliasing, but it is so little it is not a concern. I am pleased with the camera.Do I need 100 MP? No. I use the camera at full raw resolution and then down sample in photoshop. Storage is an issue with these beasts. It is a fact that 1.5-2 GB .psd files are the norm; and that is with how I use it. At full resolution, the files start out at 500 MB. And that is before editing begins. But as I said, I downsample and cut that file size in half. The versatility in editing with this camera is excellent. And not versatility as in a sports camera, or a video camera, versatility as a fine art camera such as cropping, image quality, and the optical quality of the glass.If you’re on the fence and the image quality is worth it, which I believe it is, go for it.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I bought this camera as a potential replacement of my 100sII. It was dead on arrival. Any camera can fail, so I can't say that the GFX100II is more prone to this kind of thing, statistically, but it seems like there are a rash of terminal lens mount issues, IBIS failures and stuck shutters on this model.Otherwise, compared to the 100SII, the biggest difference between this camera and that is the physical body. The design is more stylish and modern, the matte finish feels pleasant and the grip is deeper and more comfortable. The buttons also feel a nicer. The camera looks and feels more expensive. On the downside, this is a pretty heavy camera. With the eyepiece removed, it's not much bigger than the 100SII, but with it on the camera is also quite large.I decided ... MoreI bought this camera as a potential replacement of my 100sII. It was dead on arrival. Any camera can fail, so I can't say that the GFX100II is more prone to this kind of thing, statistically, but it seems like there are a rash of terminal lens mount issues, IBIS failures and stuck shutters on this model.Otherwise, compared to the 100SII, the biggest difference between this camera and that is the physical body. The design is more stylish and modern, the matte finish feels pleasant and the grip is deeper and more comfortable. The buttons also feel a nicer. The camera looks and feels more expensive. On the downside, this is a pretty heavy camera. With the eyepiece removed, it's not much bigger than the 100SII, but with it on the camera is also quite large.I decided against replacing the 100II - though I really liked the look and feel of the camera, the size and weight of the body was just too large compared to its competitors (the 100SII and the Hasselblad X2D). This body costs about the same as the X2D and that particular camera is much nicer in the hand.If staying in the Fuji system, I think the high value of the GFX100SII is hard to argue against - the price difference between the two comes out to the cost of a top tier lens. I'm not sure the build quality and handling of the GFX100II is worth it unless money is no object.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I was using a Fuji X-T5 Camera and I was happy. I always wanted the best pixels in a sensor and this camera is the solution for me. Pixels in the GFX100S2 are almost 2.5 times larger than in the X-T5. That means more light sensitive and better colors. Usually, you cannot use the highest ISO settings. I tried all ISO from 3200 to 102400 and processed all pictures with a noise reduction software. They are all usable, even the 102400! I will try not to use it, but will not hesitate to go to 25000, pictures are fully usable in accuracy and colors. All features (speed, IBIS, color and light sensitivity...) also are so much better than the old GFX100S. A great improvement. I will enjoy it for many years to come. With the quality of the GF lens' system, you have a perfect mix!
| Megapixels | 102MP |
| Sensor Size | 43.9 x 32.9mm |
| Image Stabilisation | Sensor Shift |
| Lens Mount | Fuji G |
| LCD Size | 3.2" |
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera by Onestop Digital
Free delivery between 12–17 June
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera (Body only)
Free delivery between 12–19 June
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Pro Mirrorless Body
14-day returns
Fujifilm GFX 100S II + GF 20-35mm Kit
14-day returns
Fujifilm GFX 100S II Medium Format Mirrorless Camera Body
Delivery $192
If you are thinking of jumping into Fuji medium format I would bypass the GFX 50X cameras. I owned the 50R and sold it. Image quality was ok, but stopping down was necessary. Aliasing and moire plagued images with fine detail. It was found in weathered wood, telephone poles, power lines, tree trunks, etc. Another problem with those sensors were the spots at small apertures. They showed up in even tones like veiled water, open sky, or clouds. If I had to use f16 or f22, I would be spotting hundreds of spots that could not be removed with cleaning. Test your cameras. The 50SII I purchased, but ultimately returned, had the same issues. Once you see them, you can’t unsee them.I decided to take the plunge on this camera. I tested it for the same issues and the sensor ... MoreIf you are thinking of jumping into Fuji medium format I would bypass the GFX 50X cameras. I owned the 50R and sold it. Image quality was ok, but stopping down was necessary. Aliasing and moire plagued images with fine detail. It was found in weathered wood, telephone poles, power lines, tree trunks, etc. Another problem with those sensors were the spots at small apertures. They showed up in even tones like veiled water, open sky, or clouds. If I had to use f16 or f22, I would be spotting hundreds of spots that could not be removed with cleaning. Test your cameras. The 50SII I purchased, but ultimately returned, had the same issues. Once you see them, you can’t unsee them.I decided to take the plunge on this camera. I tested it for the same issues and the sensor was clean. This camera is not free of moire and aliasing, but it is so little it is not a concern. I am pleased with the camera.Do I need 100 MP? No. I use the camera at full raw resolution and then down sample in photoshop. Storage is an issue with these beasts. It is a fact that 1.5-2 GB .psd files are the norm; and that is with how I use it. At full resolution, the files start out at 500 MB. And that is before editing begins. But as I said, I downsample and cut that file size in half. The versatility in editing with this camera is excellent. And not versatility as in a sports camera, or a video camera, versatility as a fine art camera such as cropping, image quality, and the optical quality of the glass.If you’re on the fence and the image quality is worth it, which I believe it is, go for it.
I bought this camera as a potential replacement of my 100sII. It was dead on arrival. Any camera can fail, so I can't say that the GFX100II is more prone to this kind of thing, statistically, but it seems like there are a rash of terminal lens mount issues, IBIS failures and stuck shutters on this model.Otherwise, compared to the 100SII, the biggest difference between this camera and that is the physical body. The design is more stylish and modern, the matte finish feels pleasant and the grip is deeper and more comfortable. The buttons also feel a nicer. The camera looks and feels more expensive. On the downside, this is a pretty heavy camera. With the eyepiece removed, it's not much bigger than the 100SII, but with it on the camera is also quite large.I decided ... MoreI bought this camera as a potential replacement of my 100sII. It was dead on arrival. Any camera can fail, so I can't say that the GFX100II is more prone to this kind of thing, statistically, but it seems like there are a rash of terminal lens mount issues, IBIS failures and stuck shutters on this model.Otherwise, compared to the 100SII, the biggest difference between this camera and that is the physical body. The design is more stylish and modern, the matte finish feels pleasant and the grip is deeper and more comfortable. The buttons also feel a nicer. The camera looks and feels more expensive. On the downside, this is a pretty heavy camera. With the eyepiece removed, it's not much bigger than the 100SII, but with it on the camera is also quite large.I decided against replacing the 100II - though I really liked the look and feel of the camera, the size and weight of the body was just too large compared to its competitors (the 100SII and the Hasselblad X2D). This body costs about the same as the X2D and that particular camera is much nicer in the hand.If staying in the Fuji system, I think the high value of the GFX100SII is hard to argue against - the price difference between the two comes out to the cost of a top tier lens. I'm not sure the build quality and handling of the GFX100II is worth it unless money is no object.
I was using a Fuji X-T5 Camera and I was happy. I always wanted the best pixels in a sensor and this camera is the solution for me. Pixels in the GFX100S2 are almost 2.5 times larger than in the X-T5. That means more light sensitive and better colors. Usually, you cannot use the highest ISO settings. I tried all ISO from 3200 to 102400 and processed all pictures with a noise reduction software. They are all usable, even the 102400! I will try not to use it, but will not hesitate to go to 25000, pictures are fully usable in accuracy and colors. All features (speed, IBIS, color and light sensitivity...) also are so much better than the old GFX100S. A great improvement. I will enjoy it for many years to come. With the quality of the GF lens' system, you have a perfect mix!
The 100sII is a gamechanger camera, as it brings MF to an affordable package with decent performing autofocus and a smaller body with high quality OOC JPEGs. It's an easy camera to use and very little effort is needed to get high quality pics from it. The cost is about the same as a Canon R5II, which is incredible for what you get. This is especially true given the fact that's in house rival costs nearly twice as much.I've compared the 100sII to the 100II and the X2D. The 100II was DOA, but in terms of handling and build, I preferred the 100II. It's just a nicer thing to hold with the downside of being bigger and heavier. The grip on the 100sII is excellent, but if you have bigger hands, it is a bit short (though better than the Canon R5, which I used to own). The ... MoreThe 100sII is a gamechanger camera, as it brings MF to an affordable package with decent performing autofocus and a smaller body with high quality OOC JPEGs. It's an easy camera to use and very little effort is needed to get high quality pics from it. The cost is about the same as a Canon R5II, which is incredible for what you get. This is especially true given the fact that's in house rival costs nearly twice as much.I've compared the 100sII to the 100II and the X2D. The 100II was DOA, but in terms of handling and build, I preferred the 100II. It's just a nicer thing to hold with the downside of being bigger and heavier. The grip on the 100sII is excellent, but if you have bigger hands, it is a bit short (though better than the Canon R5, which I used to own). The 100sII is all metal construction and is a very solid, dense object. The finish matches the 55 f/1.7 lens.I didn't love the feel of the buttons and aesthetically, this is an old fashioned looking camera - it doesn't feel or look premium. It's about the same size and weight as the Hasselblad X2D, with the exception that the Hasselblad system has much lighter, smaller lenses than Fuji.The image quality out of the Fuji is exceptional. With the 55 1.7, the pics are punchy, contrasty and full of color. The different film profiles are fun to play with. The images are absolutely tack sharp - this lens/body combo is the sharpest I've ever used.AF is fine. There are some missed shots. It's not something I'd use for sports. There is some shutter lag and blackout time that really limits its use for this. Eye detect works most of the time. Medium format is not the tool for that. Still life, portrait and landscape are what these cameras excel at.Metering and AWB are very well controlled and balanced on this body.Compared to the 100II - the latter is a nicer camera to hold but I'm not sure I can justify the price difference. The low cost of this camera is really incredible. The value is enormous.I ended up staying with the X2D, mostly because I prefer the look/feel/size of that body and Hasselblad's color science, but I could see how some my prefer the look of Fuji files, particularly if they are JPG shooters and need high quality OOC JPGs, given the much more extensive in camera, granular control over JPG output.
There's a lot of GFX100II buyers here giving defensive reviews of the camera, or first time MF folk who are amazed at the quality leap, duh. Alas, I'm not swayed (I own both original GFX100 and the 100S, and Phase One IQ4-150, and Sony III, IV, V, etc) This and the 100S have exactly the same sensor, use the same lenses and you end up with the same image quality at the end, so why pay double the 100S current price? Makes no sense.The MkII improvements are: a slightly better viewfinder, faster AF tracking, (may or may not matter to you) and a few things like optional battery grip and detachable finder. Not worth it to me, and I'm an inveterate upgrader!My guess is once Fuji have got rid of the backlog stock of 100S cameras, they'll discount this by $1000, or more. ... MoreThere's a lot of GFX100II buyers here giving defensive reviews of the camera, or first time MF folk who are amazed at the quality leap, duh. Alas, I'm not swayed (I own both original GFX100 and the 100S, and Phase One IQ4-150, and Sony III, IV, V, etc) This and the 100S have exactly the same sensor, use the same lenses and you end up with the same image quality at the end, so why pay double the 100S current price? Makes no sense.The MkII improvements are: a slightly better viewfinder, faster AF tracking, (may or may not matter to you) and a few things like optional battery grip and detachable finder. Not worth it to me, and I'm an inveterate upgrader!My guess is once Fuji have got rid of the backlog stock of 100S cameras, they'll discount this by $1000, or more. Otherwise, I'm happy with what I have.
I see reviews here and on blogs comparing this to the GFX 100S. This is not the 100S Mark II. It's the 100 Mark II. It's not a more expensive 100S it's a $2000 less expensive GFX 100 Version 1 ($7500 + $500 for the grip). You didn't have a grip option or a removable prism with the 100S so the complaint that is cost more than it should isn't rational. I'm contemplating upgrading from my 100 Mark I. Way better viewfinder resolution, total of THREE batteries with the grip (one in the body, two in the grip itself), better ergonomics, the ability to detach the grip if you want to go lighter (for location vs studio work), and the improved video specs are pretty amazing considering I paid $10K for the first iteration. Just wish people would stop comparing it to the 100S. ... MoreI see reviews here and on blogs comparing this to the GFX 100S. This is not the 100S Mark II. It's the 100 Mark II. It's not a more expensive 100S it's a $2000 less expensive GFX 100 Version 1 ($7500 + $500 for the grip). You didn't have a grip option or a removable prism with the 100S so the complaint that is cost more than it should isn't rational. I'm contemplating upgrading from my 100 Mark I. Way better viewfinder resolution, total of THREE batteries with the grip (one in the body, two in the grip itself), better ergonomics, the ability to detach the grip if you want to go lighter (for location vs studio work), and the improved video specs are pretty amazing considering I paid $10K for the first iteration. Just wish people would stop comparing it to the 100S. That's a great camera on its own, but they are two different models for different uses/users. Even if Fuji decides not to continue the S version and has merged the two into this one body design it seems like it's easily $2500 worth of improvement. IMHO.
I have been shooting Fuji gear since the original X100 era. I have also owned and shot all previous versions of this GFX - both 50 and 100, in all kinds of environments. This is an absolutely amazing device. I’ve shot it already in many flavors of light and motion. Shot race cars running more than 90 mph in night and day. Really high-contrast ocean environments. Family parties. Coyote packs. Geese in flight. This thing just nails them all. My one complaint is that my brain is not really good at setting up all the buttons on ANY modern camera, so because this camera has so many options, it has taken me longer than usual to get it running quickly in my clumsy fingers, and with a brain that is slower than the camera. After a week or two I am now settling into some ... MoreI have been shooting Fuji gear since the original X100 era. I have also owned and shot all previous versions of this GFX - both 50 and 100, in all kinds of environments. This is an absolutely amazing device. I’ve shot it already in many flavors of light and motion. Shot race cars running more than 90 mph in night and day. Really high-contrast ocean environments. Family parties. Coyote packs. Geese in flight. This thing just nails them all. My one complaint is that my brain is not really good at setting up all the buttons on ANY modern camera, so because this camera has so many options, it has taken me longer than usual to get it running quickly in my clumsy fingers, and with a brain that is slower than the camera. After a week or two I am now settling into some button control sequences that I don’t upset accidentally by pushing the wrong sequence. And the camera does amazing things if I don’t mess up. I’m still not used to a rear control dial that can do several things, but the camera is teaching me how that works. :-). And the images in a computer are like a whole new multi-dimensional universe to play in. Wonderful. My biggest problem with the camera is that there are moments I feel dumber than a rock in comparison. I’m also left-eyed, so my nose sometimes takes control of the screen and a button or two. But I have to say, my human feelings of inferiority disappear instantly when this thing pops its wonderful images on the screen. And I feel great when I finally learn a new button combination that lets me do things I could never do with any camera before. Love it. Thank you Fuji, not just for a device, but for a whole new series of imaging and learning experiences.
I've had the camera for two weeks now and there have been some improvements.Compared to the previous generation, the GFX 100S, the autofocus, and continuous shooting have noticeably improved. The lag on the screen after pressing the shutter has also been slightly reduced.Now, let me talk about the pros:1. Compared to full-frame cameras, you can notice the better bokeh.It has an excellent 16-bit dynamic range.2. The size and weight aren't much bigger or heavier than full-frame cameras.However, there are some downsides:1.The build quality still isn't great. The edges feel like they wear down and chip easily, and overall, it has a plasticky feel (even though it isn't made of plastic).2.The dual SD card design limits the burst shooting speed and the ... MoreI've had the camera for two weeks now and there have been some improvements.Compared to the previous generation, the GFX 100S, the autofocus, and continuous shooting have noticeably improved. The lag on the screen after pressing the shutter has also been slightly reduced.Now, let me talk about the pros:1. Compared to full-frame cameras, you can notice the better bokeh.It has an excellent 16-bit dynamic range.2. The size and weight aren't much bigger or heavier than full-frame cameras.However, there are some downsides:1.The build quality still isn't great. The edges feel like they wear down and chip easily, and overall, it has a plasticky feel (even though it isn't made of plastic).2.The dual SD card design limits the burst shooting speed and the camera’s buffer.3.There aren't enough customizable buttons. It would be better to have the D-pad like on the XT5 or XH2S.I've only had it briefly, but overall, despite its many flaws, I like this camera. I hope that with more time, I can provide a more detailed review.
This is my second review of camera gear ever. My first was a review of the GFX100s. I'm a pro photographer, having moved from photojournalism to the commercial world.I really liked the GFX100s. It was not perfect, but having shot medium format for years from 6x7 film to Phase One, and everything in between, I felt like it was the best balance of having a modern useable camera with a large sensor. It had its shortcomings, most notably drive and AF. I upgraded because the GFX100sII has made inroads in those areas.General Impressions: It feels like the same camera. I was hoping the more rubberized coating would add a bit more of a rugged feel, but it does not. However, that is not to say that the camera does not feel rugged, it just doesn't feel that way compared ... MoreThis is my second review of camera gear ever. My first was a review of the GFX100s. I'm a pro photographer, having moved from photojournalism to the commercial world.I really liked the GFX100s. It was not perfect, but having shot medium format for years from 6x7 film to Phase One, and everything in between, I felt like it was the best balance of having a modern useable camera with a large sensor. It had its shortcomings, most notably drive and AF. I upgraded because the GFX100sII has made inroads in those areas.General Impressions: It feels like the same camera. I was hoping the more rubberized coating would add a bit more of a rugged feel, but it does not. However, that is not to say that the camera does not feel rugged, it just doesn't feel that way compared to my previous favorite, the Pentax 645z. I wish they had upgraded the dials with a beefier rubber coating. But that's just my desire. It's generally a good feeling camera. It feels about the same in your hand as a full size full frame DSLR. Except it's probably lighter than my old Canon 5Dmk3. I note that people complain about the size of these cameras, but compared to a phase one or my old Pentax, or a Hasselblad, these are small modern cameras.This camera has all the function buttons you want which are customizable however you want. And the 6 custom settings available on the dial, just like the previous version.The EVF and display are noticeably better than the 100s.AF and Drive. The AF system is WAY better than the 100s. For that alone it's worth the upgrade. My last modern FF camera was the Sony a7r3, and this AF is better than that. So it all feels modern to me. I suspect that someone who is used to shooting the latest Sony systems with their latest AF will feel different, and might feel slowed down by this. But if like me you are used to Medium Format systems, this feels like a racecar. The AI autofocus does a pretty good job of tracking cats, dogs, birds. I'm not a wildlife photographer, so someone who knows how to do it will have an easier time than I did getting pics of birds in flight. Otherwise the Eye AF and Subject AF are miracles in the medium format world.The drive has been upgraded, and you can now choose a 7 fps option. But at that rate you go from 16 bit down to 14 bit. In practice that doesn't seem to affect me. I generally shoot in 14 bit anyway. That last little bit doesn't make a big difference to me though I suspect in situations where subtle gradations occur, you might do better in 16 bit to avoid banding.I also bought the new 500 5.6 with this, and they work well together. It is amazing to me how light they feel. The engineers did a great job balancing the weight in the center, I have been handholding shots at 1/40th and getting them sharp. I never thought that would be possible.In short, I think that this camera, especially at this price point, is a dream for pros who want a larger format sensor. I highly recommend it. I still think the Pentax raw files were the best I've ever worked with, but as far as having a modern useable camera, this is the best thing out there by far.Those who need or want the fastest AF, drive, and smaller bodies are still going to want to stick with Sony etc for Full Frame. I wouldn't shoot any of the other MF cameras again after this one.Just a note, I process my RAW files in Lightroom. I've put LR side by side with Capture One, and I can't see any major differences in the Camera profiles between them. I just really don't like the Fuji film simulations at all, and I think I get the best results starting from the Adobe Color profile. You might feel different, but to me the film sims are ham-handed and over-contrasted, over color-casted, and take away from what are great raw files.
I love my GFX 100 II.My previous camera was an GFX 100 (original, not 100S).I purchased the 100 after trying a 100S for 2 weeks due to the 100's much better EVF and availability of tilting-turning finder.I am a landscape-macro (stills only, always RAW, 16 bit lossess) hobby photographer in Florida. I usually need manual focus to control depth of field.Very quickly, the 100 II was faster to make images, and gradually requires less and less concentration on the equipment.I love the camera as a substantial step forward in functionality and ease of use.Distinct advantages of the 100 II over 100: 1) even better EVF, in resolution, and 100% view (so helpful for accurate framing!);2) even better IBIS;3) autofocus now worth using to get me in ball park (was rarely ... MoreI love my GFX 100 II.My previous camera was an GFX 100 (original, not 100S).I purchased the 100 after trying a 100S for 2 weeks due to the 100's much better EVF and availability of tilting-turning finder.I am a landscape-macro (stills only, always RAW, 16 bit lossess) hobby photographer in Florida. I usually need manual focus to control depth of field.Very quickly, the 100 II was faster to make images, and gradually requires less and less concentration on the equipment.I love the camera as a substantial step forward in functionality and ease of use.Distinct advantages of the 100 II over 100: 1) even better EVF, in resolution, and 100% view (so helpful for accurate framing!);2) even better IBIS;3) autofocus now worth using to get me in ball park (was rarely useful with 100);4) faster response in all interactions due to processor speed;5) smaller size and more hand-friendly shape and balance, not just reduced weight (balance of 100 could be awkward);Changing lenses in the field easier and faster;6) Electronic-button interface is overall better (I was fine with 100, and preferred it to 100S);7) I really like 3 buttons on front and submonitor displaying their functions.8) Tilted top plate a winner;9) Submonitor more useful;I am able to use a Kirk L bracket for a GFX 100S (not perfect, so use at your own risk).If anyone does an L bracket with a 2 point connection (like the RRS bracket for original 100) I will buy it.Problems with 100 II.1) Lack of wireless shutter release that does not require a cable and transmitter) is a big pain for field work.2) Moving the cable release connection to the left is a problem. Conflicts with L Bracket.3) Must have an L plug on shutter release to allow using an L bracket. After much searching, I found online an L plug male 3.5mm to female 2.5mm short adapter cable.4) Fragile little plastic door fouls cable to L bracket area often, and does not have a hinge.Wish list:W1) wish light brightness submonitor button was in a menu, and the (prime real estate) location were a programmable function button.W2) Q button easily bumped location, which leads to mistakes, just like on 100.W3) Q menu still puts me off. Have not learned to use it. Assume will be useful when I invest the time.W4) Please give RAW shooters histogram options and display options to accurately judge highlight clipping.Dream list:A 44x44mm sensor camera. Could still use the same lenses.A 20 or 24 bit ADC and full width data path and files.I would love to get closer to the dynamic range of professional color negative film.I worked my way through college as a photographer in the 1960's: operator and instruction manuals of heavy industrial equipment (4x5 camera), weddings (2 1/4 x 2 3/4 Koni Omega, then 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 Hasselblad), local & college newspapers, events,process camera and custom darkroom printer.Left photography to go to graduate school. Eventually set up a hobby color darkroom and printed color negatives to 16x20 paper.Last film cameras were/are Hasselblad 500C and 500EL/M + 5 lenses (40-250), tubes, bellows, grips, finders...Dropped out of photography for 20 years or so.Digital cameras were Canon G series, then Sony A7R, A7RII, A7RIII, A7RIV, before GFX100.I have the GFX 20-35, 45-100mm, 120mm, 100-200mm, 1.4TC, tilting finder adapter (always on the camera).I have a Fringer adapted Canon 100-400 II + Canon TC 2.0 II. Looking forward to the future GFX 500mm (wish it were 300-600 5.6-f/8).I predict I shall buy the GFX 100 tiltshift and sell the 120mm. I began by using my Hasselblad lenses on the GFX. Metabones adapter orKipon tiltshift with 120 mm. Wish Metabones quality tilt shift existed. Wish all GFX lenses had a tripod collar.
| Megapixels | 102MP |
| Sensor Size | 43.9 x 32.9mm |
| Image Stabilisation | Sensor Shift |
| Lens Mount | Fuji G |
| LCD Size | 3.2" |
