Intel Core i7-10700K CPU Processor
The Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel is a high-performance processor designed to elevate your computing experience. With its impressive clock speed of 3.80GHz, this processor ensures smooth and efficient multitasking, allowing you to effortlessly handle demanding tasks and applications. Powered by Intel's advanced technology, the Core i7-10700K delivers exceptional performance and responsiveness. Whether you're a gamer, content creator, or professional, this processor is capable of delivering the power you need for seamless productivity. Designed with the latest architecture, the Core i7-10700K offers improved performance and efficiency. Experience faster data transfer and reduced latency, allowing you to maximize your productivity and enjoy a smoother computing experience. Equipped with Intel's Turbo Boost technology, this processor automatically adjusts its clock speed to optimize performance based on your workload. This means you can enjoy faster processing speeds when you need it most, ensuring a seamless and responsive computing experience. Upgrade your system with the Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel and unlock new levels of performance and productivity. With its exceptional power and advanced technology, this processor is a must-have for those seeking ultimate computing performance.
The Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel is a high-performance processor designed to elevate your computing experience. With its impressive clock speed of 3.80GHz, this processor ensures smooth and efficient multitasking, allowing you to effortlessly handle demanding tasks and applications. Powered by Intel's advanced technology, the Core i7-10700K delivers exceptional performance and responsiveness. Whether you're a gamer, content creator, or professional, this processor is capable of delivering the power you need for seamless productivity. Designed with the latest architecture, the Core i7-10700K offers improved performance and efficiency. Experience faster data transfer and reduced latency, allowing you to maximize your productivity and enjoy a smoother computing experience. Equipped with Intel's Turbo Boost technology, this processor automatically adjusts its clock speed to optimize performance based on your workload. This means you can enjoy faster processing speeds when you need it most, ensuring a seamless and responsive computing experience. Upgrade your system with the Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel and unlock new levels of performance and productivity. With its exceptional power and advanced technology, this processor is a must-have for those seeking ultimate computing performance.
The Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel is a high-performance processor designed to elevate your computing experience. With its impressive clock speed of 3.80GHz, this processor ensures smooth and efficient multitasking, allowing you to effortlessly handle demanding tasks and applications. Powered by Intel's advanced technology, the Core i7-10700K delivers exceptional performance and responsiveness. Whether you're a gamer, content creator, or professional, this processor is capable of delivering the power you need for seamless productivity. Designed with the latest architecture, the Core i7-10700K offers improved performance and efficiency. Experience faster data transfer and reduced latency, allowing you to maximize your productivity and enjoy a smoother computing experience. Equipped with Intel's Turbo Boost technology, this processor automatically adjusts its clock speed to optimize performance based on your workload. This means you can enjoy faster processing speeds when you need it most, ensuring a seamless and responsive computing experience. Upgrade your system with the Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel and unlock new levels of performance and productivity. With its exceptional power and advanced technology, this processor is a must-have for those seeking ultimate computing performance.
The Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel is a high-performance processor designed to elevate your computing experience. With its impressive clock speed of 3.80GHz, this processor ensures smooth and efficient multitasking, allowing you to effortlessly handle demanding tasks and applications. Powered by Intel's advanced technology, the Core i7-10700K delivers exceptional performance and responsiveness. Whether you're a gamer, content creator, or professional, this processor is capable of delivering the power you need for seamless productivity. Designed with the latest architecture, the Core i7-10700K offers improved performance and efficiency. Experience faster data transfer and reduced latency, allowing you to maximize your productivity and enjoy a smoother computing experience. Equipped with Intel's Turbo Boost technology, this processor automatically adjusts its clock speed to optimize performance based on your workload. This means you can enjoy faster processing speeds when you need it most, ensuring a seamless and responsive computing experience. Upgrade your system with the Core i7-10700K 3.80GHz from Intel and unlock new levels of performance and productivity. With its exceptional power and advanced technology, this processor is a must-have for those seeking ultimate computing performance.
in 3 offers
The lowest price for Intel Core i7-10700K CPU Processor right now is $255.85 at eBay.com.au, compared across 3 retailers.
The all-time low was $255.85 on 23 June 2026. That's the lowest price we've ever tracked — a great time to buy.
Prices last updated 23 June 2026.
Last updated at 23/06/2026 01:22:14
Intel Core i7-10700K 3.8 GHz 8 cores socket 1200 (SRH72) 16MB
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Intel Core i7-10700K
Free delivery between 1–7 July
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked? LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W
Delivery between 29 June – 2 July $29
originally posted on microcenter.com
This was purchased with an MSI Z490 motherboard and the combination works very well. While the rated clock speed is 3.8GHz per core, monitor software shows that each core runs at 4.9GHz turbo boost whenever there's an actual load.I have not done anything special to overclock it, which the MSI board offers, because there seems to be little reason - I'm already close to the fully boosted 5.1GHz turbo speed. This is important to me since my application (long LTspice circuit simulations) does not always thread well, so I need to maximize clock speed per core, which favors processors like this i7 which offers higher turbo core speeds but a smaller thermal footprint than an i9 with a greater number of possibly slower cores.I'm using it with a Cooler Master HYPER 212X, ... MoreThis was purchased with an MSI Z490 motherboard and the combination works very well. While the rated clock speed is 3.8GHz per core, monitor software shows that each core runs at 4.9GHz turbo boost whenever there's an actual load.I have not done anything special to overclock it, which the MSI board offers, because there seems to be little reason - I'm already close to the fully boosted 5.1GHz turbo speed. This is important to me since my application (long LTspice circuit simulations) does not always thread well, so I need to maximize clock speed per core, which favors processors like this i7 which offers higher turbo core speeds but a smaller thermal footprint than an i9 with a greater number of possibly slower cores.I'm using it with a Cooler Master HYPER 212X, which is a bit fiddly to install, but once you get it attached properly, it does work really well, and helps to achieve maximum clock speeds. I did not want to mess with liquid cooling, and given the reasonably low peak temperatures I see, I don't think there's a need for any better cooling.Since this is primarily a compute machine, I am using the built in graphics, and they work quite well without the hassle, expense, and heat of an extra display card. This version of the i7-10700 provides built in graphics, but not all do so make sure you pick the right one if you need this feature.Overall, it's a great processor that works reliably with no tweaking or special setup. I may explore overclocking at some point, but for me, reliability is more important, so I will probably leave everything as stock, essentially underclocking the RAM and running the processor at its factory settings.The pricing on this processor is also very good, significantly better than I have seen online, making it a great price/performance value. I'm glad I chose this model and that I purchased it from Micro Center. No regrets at all.
originally posted on microcenter.com
As a long-time Windows user, I was notified that the new Windows 11 would soon replace Windows 10.After checking my home-built tower PC for compatibility, I discovered that I would require a newmotherboard with the TPM feature that's required to run Windows 11. Since I use my PC for business,I decided to upgrade it for compatibility with Windows 11.I visited my local Micro Center store to see what was available for a system upgrade. I describedmy current system and the salesman who was exceptionally knowledgeable. He gave me a list of components that included an MCI Z490-A Pro-ATX motherboard, a 10th generation Core I7 CPU and cooler, 16 GB of memory, and a 500 MB solid-state drive. I was able to use my existing case, graphic cards, monitors,and hard ... MoreAs a long-time Windows user, I was notified that the new Windows 11 would soon replace Windows 10.After checking my home-built tower PC for compatibility, I discovered that I would require a newmotherboard with the TPM feature that's required to run Windows 11. Since I use my PC for business,I decided to upgrade it for compatibility with Windows 11.I visited my local Micro Center store to see what was available for a system upgrade. I describedmy current system and the salesman who was exceptionally knowledgeable. He gave me a list of components that included an MCI Z490-A Pro-ATX motherboard, a 10th generation Core I7 CPU and cooler, 16 GB of memory, and a 500 MB solid-state drive. I was able to use my existing case, graphic cards, monitors,and hard drives.Although I personally bought the parts and assembled my old PC, I had Micro Center rebuild and check out my new system, which was ready for pickup after a few days. Since Windows is now on the Solid State Drive, Windows boots and is ready to use within a few seconds. Looking back, Micro Center's knowledgeable staff was exceptionally helpful in understanding my system goals, choosing the right components, and saving me money by using existing parts (SATA hard drives, case, graphic cards, etc.) to rebuild my new, Windows 11-compatible system. If your current Windows PC doesn't meet the Windows 11 specification, such as having a motherboard without the new TPM chip or an outdated CPU, go talk to the staff at Microcenter. They will definitely provide the information and assistance to provide you with a Windows 11-compatible system at a reasonablecost. And they will test your system to make sure everything is working properly before you take it home.
originally posted on newegg.com
READ FIRST: CLAIMED CINEBENCH SCORES AND TEMPERATURE ALLEGATIONS First of, i would like to call out almost EVERY major reviewer and benchmarker out on the internet for the following: LEAVING MCE ON! MCE for those who dont know the term, is Multi Core Enhancements, BUT it may have a different name depending on the MB Manufacturer, in my case MSI names it ENHANCED TURBO and it comes ON by default. What it is is basically a MB overclock, boosting all core and single core clocks as well as a horribly high voltage. Since its not tuned properly it just outputs such a high voltage to "guarantee" a safe overclock, at the expense on temps of course. This option is NOT STOCK, so naturally Cinebench scores are 510-520 single and 5100-5300 multi, but with temps up in the 90c, ... MoreREAD FIRST: CLAIMED CINEBENCH SCORES AND TEMPERATURE ALLEGATIONS First of, i would like to call out almost EVERY major reviewer and benchmarker out on the internet for the following: LEAVING MCE ON! MCE for those who dont know the term, is Multi Core Enhancements, BUT it may have a different name depending on the MB Manufacturer, in my case MSI names it ENHANCED TURBO and it comes ON by default. What it is is basically a MB overclock, boosting all core and single core clocks as well as a horribly high voltage. Since its not tuned properly it just outputs such a high voltage to "guarantee" a safe overclock, at the expense on temps of course. This option is NOT STOCK, so naturally Cinebench scores are 510-520 single and 5100-5300 multi, but with temps up in the 90c, cooking with an AIO A TRUE stock i7 10700k will do 480-490 single 4800-4950 multi but with temps as high as 75c with the same AIO. SO if you plan on running STOCK be sure to disable this feature as its basically a trash factory overclock. If you are gonna OC, then you probably know what your doing so thats that. Excellent cpu, hands down. People constantly ask me why i got this cpu if 1. there is AMD, and 2. the 10600k is better for gaming, which i do the most. The reason is that i come from an i5 4670k, which 6 years ago was a better offering for gaming than the i7 4770k. Today the 4670k is doing 100% load and bottlenecking in games like COD Warzone, while the i7 4770k is still doing ok. So in theory X years from now the i5 10600k will be struggling while the i7 with the extra 2 cores perhaps will have still some life left. And for AMD im simply not interested in what they offer, as simple as that. I mean if i buy a Ford is because i like Ford as a brand, and why should i be inclined to buy a Toyota for example? Intel is my choice, not because its better or not than AMD, just because i want it period.
| General | |
| Product Type | Processor |
| Width | 4.4 cm |
| Depth | 11.6 cm |
| Height | 10.1 cm |
Intel Core i7-10700K 3.8 GHz 8 cores socket 1200 (SRH72) 16MB
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Intel Core i7-10700K
Free delivery between 1–7 July
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked? LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W
Delivery between 29 June – 2 July $29
This was purchased with an MSI Z490 motherboard and the combination works very well. While the rated clock speed is 3.8GHz per core, monitor software shows that each core runs at 4.9GHz turbo boost whenever there's an actual load.I have not done anything special to overclock it, which the MSI board offers, because there seems to be little reason - I'm already close to the fully boosted 5.1GHz turbo speed. This is important to me since my application (long LTspice circuit simulations) does not always thread well, so I need to maximize clock speed per core, which favors processors like this i7 which offers higher turbo core speeds but a smaller thermal footprint than an i9 with a greater number of possibly slower cores.I'm using it with a Cooler Master HYPER 212X, ... MoreThis was purchased with an MSI Z490 motherboard and the combination works very well. While the rated clock speed is 3.8GHz per core, monitor software shows that each core runs at 4.9GHz turbo boost whenever there's an actual load.I have not done anything special to overclock it, which the MSI board offers, because there seems to be little reason - I'm already close to the fully boosted 5.1GHz turbo speed. This is important to me since my application (long LTspice circuit simulations) does not always thread well, so I need to maximize clock speed per core, which favors processors like this i7 which offers higher turbo core speeds but a smaller thermal footprint than an i9 with a greater number of possibly slower cores.I'm using it with a Cooler Master HYPER 212X, which is a bit fiddly to install, but once you get it attached properly, it does work really well, and helps to achieve maximum clock speeds. I did not want to mess with liquid cooling, and given the reasonably low peak temperatures I see, I don't think there's a need for any better cooling.Since this is primarily a compute machine, I am using the built in graphics, and they work quite well without the hassle, expense, and heat of an extra display card. This version of the i7-10700 provides built in graphics, but not all do so make sure you pick the right one if you need this feature.Overall, it's a great processor that works reliably with no tweaking or special setup. I may explore overclocking at some point, but for me, reliability is more important, so I will probably leave everything as stock, essentially underclocking the RAM and running the processor at its factory settings.The pricing on this processor is also very good, significantly better than I have seen online, making it a great price/performance value. I'm glad I chose this model and that I purchased it from Micro Center. No regrets at all.
As a long-time Windows user, I was notified that the new Windows 11 would soon replace Windows 10.After checking my home-built tower PC for compatibility, I discovered that I would require a newmotherboard with the TPM feature that's required to run Windows 11. Since I use my PC for business,I decided to upgrade it for compatibility with Windows 11.I visited my local Micro Center store to see what was available for a system upgrade. I describedmy current system and the salesman who was exceptionally knowledgeable. He gave me a list of components that included an MCI Z490-A Pro-ATX motherboard, a 10th generation Core I7 CPU and cooler, 16 GB of memory, and a 500 MB solid-state drive. I was able to use my existing case, graphic cards, monitors,and hard ... MoreAs a long-time Windows user, I was notified that the new Windows 11 would soon replace Windows 10.After checking my home-built tower PC for compatibility, I discovered that I would require a newmotherboard with the TPM feature that's required to run Windows 11. Since I use my PC for business,I decided to upgrade it for compatibility with Windows 11.I visited my local Micro Center store to see what was available for a system upgrade. I describedmy current system and the salesman who was exceptionally knowledgeable. He gave me a list of components that included an MCI Z490-A Pro-ATX motherboard, a 10th generation Core I7 CPU and cooler, 16 GB of memory, and a 500 MB solid-state drive. I was able to use my existing case, graphic cards, monitors,and hard drives.Although I personally bought the parts and assembled my old PC, I had Micro Center rebuild and check out my new system, which was ready for pickup after a few days. Since Windows is now on the Solid State Drive, Windows boots and is ready to use within a few seconds. Looking back, Micro Center's knowledgeable staff was exceptionally helpful in understanding my system goals, choosing the right components, and saving me money by using existing parts (SATA hard drives, case, graphic cards, etc.) to rebuild my new, Windows 11-compatible system. If your current Windows PC doesn't meet the Windows 11 specification, such as having a motherboard without the new TPM chip or an outdated CPU, go talk to the staff at Microcenter. They will definitely provide the information and assistance to provide you with a Windows 11-compatible system at a reasonablecost. And they will test your system to make sure everything is working properly before you take it home.
READ FIRST: CLAIMED CINEBENCH SCORES AND TEMPERATURE ALLEGATIONS First of, i would like to call out almost EVERY major reviewer and benchmarker out on the internet for the following: LEAVING MCE ON! MCE for those who dont know the term, is Multi Core Enhancements, BUT it may have a different name depending on the MB Manufacturer, in my case MSI names it ENHANCED TURBO and it comes ON by default. What it is is basically a MB overclock, boosting all core and single core clocks as well as a horribly high voltage. Since its not tuned properly it just outputs such a high voltage to "guarantee" a safe overclock, at the expense on temps of course. This option is NOT STOCK, so naturally Cinebench scores are 510-520 single and 5100-5300 multi, but with temps up in the 90c, ... MoreREAD FIRST: CLAIMED CINEBENCH SCORES AND TEMPERATURE ALLEGATIONS First of, i would like to call out almost EVERY major reviewer and benchmarker out on the internet for the following: LEAVING MCE ON! MCE for those who dont know the term, is Multi Core Enhancements, BUT it may have a different name depending on the MB Manufacturer, in my case MSI names it ENHANCED TURBO and it comes ON by default. What it is is basically a MB overclock, boosting all core and single core clocks as well as a horribly high voltage. Since its not tuned properly it just outputs such a high voltage to "guarantee" a safe overclock, at the expense on temps of course. This option is NOT STOCK, so naturally Cinebench scores are 510-520 single and 5100-5300 multi, but with temps up in the 90c, cooking with an AIO A TRUE stock i7 10700k will do 480-490 single 4800-4950 multi but with temps as high as 75c with the same AIO. SO if you plan on running STOCK be sure to disable this feature as its basically a trash factory overclock. If you are gonna OC, then you probably know what your doing so thats that. Excellent cpu, hands down. People constantly ask me why i got this cpu if 1. there is AMD, and 2. the 10600k is better for gaming, which i do the most. The reason is that i come from an i5 4670k, which 6 years ago was a better offering for gaming than the i7 4770k. Today the 4670k is doing 100% load and bottlenecking in games like COD Warzone, while the i7 4770k is still doing ok. So in theory X years from now the i5 10600k will be struggling while the i7 with the extra 2 cores perhaps will have still some life left. And for AMD im simply not interested in what they offer, as simple as that. I mean if i buy a Ford is because i like Ford as a brand, and why should i be inclined to buy a Toyota for example? Intel is my choice, not because its better or not than AMD, just because i want it period.
I just built a new system and included this processor in the build. I researched the i5 12600K, i7 12700K, i9 12900K, as well as AMD Ryzen 9 5900, Ryzen 7 5800X, and Ryzen 7 3800X.I have always used Intel CPUs in my prior builds, but was leaning toward the newer AMD for multi-task performance & price point.Then I saw the new Intel Alder Lake series and I just had to check it out. I researched and compared the above choices against each other, price point, and performance. I was temped to save some money and go with the i5, and felt the difference in performance between the i9 and i7 was not worth the additional cost. Same held true for the AMDs, unless you go nuts on a Threadripper, AMD has lost the edge, and pricing is not any better than Intel at this time. ... MoreI just built a new system and included this processor in the build. I researched the i5 12600K, i7 12700K, i9 12900K, as well as AMD Ryzen 9 5900, Ryzen 7 5800X, and Ryzen 7 3800X.I have always used Intel CPUs in my prior builds, but was leaning toward the newer AMD for multi-task performance & price point.Then I saw the new Intel Alder Lake series and I just had to check it out. I researched and compared the above choices against each other, price point, and performance. I was temped to save some money and go with the i5, and felt the difference in performance between the i9 and i7 was not worth the additional cost. Same held true for the AMDs, unless you go nuts on a Threadripper, AMD has lost the edge, and pricing is not any better than Intel at this time. I'm sure they both will go over and under for years to come.In the end, I decided on the i7 12700K, and am very happy with my choice.I came from a i7 2600 that served me well since about 2011, but it was getting tired and slower.This new i7 12700K is super fast for me, and does all I want it to do. The performance upgrade from the old i7 2600 is phenomenal!Love this processor, and Intel finally got back into the game!
I spent over $400 for an upgrade on 5 month old gaming computer and when geek squad gets done with it, I get back a broken gaming computer. I am very disappointed and upset. I brought my sons computer into the villages Geek Squad at Best Buy to have the processor upgraded. When purchasing the first processor, which was an i7 10th gen processor bought in store, i was advised that they needed to check with a tech to make sure the motherboard would support it. They came back and advised me that the mother board would support it. I Dropped the computer off on scheduled date and was told when I picked it up that now the motherboard would not support the processor and I needed a i7 9th gen. When advising them of what I was told the day before, the just said that was ... MoreI spent over $400 for an upgrade on 5 month old gaming computer and when geek squad gets done with it, I get back a broken gaming computer. I am very disappointed and upset. I brought my sons computer into the villages Geek Squad at Best Buy to have the processor upgraded. When purchasing the first processor, which was an i7 10th gen processor bought in store, i was advised that they needed to check with a tech to make sure the motherboard would support it. They came back and advised me that the mother board would support it. I Dropped the computer off on scheduled date and was told when I picked it up that now the motherboard would not support the processor and I needed a i7 9th gen. When advising them of what I was told the day before, the just said that was incorrect and they didn’t know who said it. Ok, no biggie, ordered a new one and scheduled another date to drop the computer off. After leaving it for a day, I go to pick it up and see the lady had a part of the computer separate. I was then advised that the computer had a yellow screen when they turned it on, after the new processor placed. and that the graphics card is bad and needs to be replaced. I am furious. My son was on that computer until the day it was dropped off and it was working fine. Now I pick it up after wanting just the i3 processor upgraded to an i7 processor, for the reason of my son wanting to play games that an i3 processor did not support and caused the computer to freeze. I was told that they could not prove the computer worked before I got there and there was nothing they could do but sell me a new graphics card (approx.$300) Why would I bring a broken computer in to have an upgrade? If the graphics card was bad and screen was yellow, I would have brought it in for that. I do plan to contact corporate about this situation.
The i7-10700K is Intel's latest Core i7 offering, filling that niche in the new 10th gen "Comet Lake" series of desktop processors. It performs exceptionally well in gaming, which favors single-threaded performance and high frequency, both of which the 10700K offers in spades, while lagging behind AMD's 3900X and 3950X in productivity workloads due to those chips having 50% and 100% more cores + threads, respectively. Intel seems to have solved the glaring thermal issues that plagued the 8th and 9th gen CPUs by thinning out the IHS material, so the dies have closer contact with the cold plate on the cooling solution. On its own, the 10700K is a 5-star chip, but in the broader context of the other 10th-gen Intel processors, it loses a star because its position amidst ... MoreThe i7-10700K is Intel's latest Core i7 offering, filling that niche in the new 10th gen "Comet Lake" series of desktop processors. It performs exceptionally well in gaming, which favors single-threaded performance and high frequency, both of which the 10700K offers in spades, while lagging behind AMD's 3900X and 3950X in productivity workloads due to those chips having 50% and 100% more cores + threads, respectively. Intel seems to have solved the glaring thermal issues that plagued the 8th and 9th gen CPUs by thinning out the IHS material, so the dies have closer contact with the cold plate on the cooling solution. On its own, the 10700K is a 5-star chip, but in the broader context of the other 10th-gen Intel processors, it loses a star because its position amidst the rest of the 10th gen lineup essentially serves no purpose, as I'll discuss.Why do I say this? Well, the i5-10600K can easily be OC'ed to exceed the stock frequencies that the 10700K brings to the table. This means you can get essentially equal gaming performance compared to a stock 10700K, from a chip that costs half as much, because the reduction in core count has basically zero impact on FPS. I'm not saying the 10700K clock speeds can't be tuned up as well, but I'm stressing that its intended place in the gaming performance hierarchy can be usurped by a chip that retails for less than 250 bucks. The 10600K is also a more OC'able CPU in its own right, and can be pushed harder relative to its base specs than the 10700K can relative to its own stock speeds.On the other side of the equation, the i9-10900K represents peak Comet Lake, offering the best performance for any type of workload that 10th gen has to offer, while only retailing for ~$100 more than the 10700K. The 10900K is the undisputed performance king of this generation, beating the 10700K soundly both in terms of gaming (both single-core and all-core turbo are significantly faster) and productivity (aforementioned frequency advantage + an additional 2 cores / 4 threads to play with).Does my criticism become slightly clearer in light of the role that the 10600K and the 10900K play? The 10700k is either a slightly better 10600K that costs ~100% more, or a much worse 10900K that costs only ~$100 less. The 10700K doesn't know what it wants to be, and the rest of 10th gen definitely does, which is why this chip is not the best purchase in the context of its generation.
I was building my custom pc and I was having a hard time deciding between the i5-11600K and the i7-10700K. I ultimately chose the i7 because it has more cores and would be better for what I need it for.With it, I built a really solid and powerful system that is able to quickly edit videos and graphics. It boots up fast and is the most powerful computer I've had to date.The CPU works like a charm and I am happy with my choice. I also liked the fact that I was able to pick it up locally, without having to wait for it to be shipped.The only thing I don't like is what I had to pay to get it. It was significantly higher in price than the i5 despite having comparable specs and being an older CPU. I think it's possible to find it cheaper elsewhere, but I needed it ... MoreI was building my custom pc and I was having a hard time deciding between the i5-11600K and the i7-10700K. I ultimately chose the i7 because it has more cores and would be better for what I need it for.With it, I built a really solid and powerful system that is able to quickly edit videos and graphics. It boots up fast and is the most powerful computer I've had to date.The CPU works like a charm and I am happy with my choice. I also liked the fact that I was able to pick it up locally, without having to wait for it to be shipped.The only thing I don't like is what I had to pay to get it. It was significantly higher in price than the i5 despite having comparable specs and being an older CPU. I think it's possible to find it cheaper elsewhere, but I needed it right away so I basically had to pay for the convenience... not ideal but it is what it is. It's hard to get CPUs during a chip shortage after all.
As a power user, I always find it beneficial to run both a mean production/workstation rig and a gaming rig, if budget allows it. When I finally got my Certs. for Digital Media, I had both a Devil's Canyon 4790K Z97 setup for gaming, and a Broadwell-E X99 rig for workstation projects. The experience was excellent. Then enter the Ryzen line of products... and what I was doing on two systems, was now magically achievable in one.With their 3000 series, the gap closed even more on gaming, all while staying within range of it's TDP. Intel then answers with the 10th gen, touting it as the gaming king, but that's where it ends. In many situations, the 10700k comparatively does worse in my use case. When comparing it to it's 8 core rival, the 3700x or even the 3800x, the ... MoreAs a power user, I always find it beneficial to run both a mean production/workstation rig and a gaming rig, if budget allows it. When I finally got my Certs. for Digital Media, I had both a Devil's Canyon 4790K Z97 setup for gaming, and a Broadwell-E X99 rig for workstation projects. The experience was excellent. Then enter the Ryzen line of products... and what I was doing on two systems, was now magically achievable in one.With their 3000 series, the gap closed even more on gaming, all while staying within range of it's TDP. Intel then answers with the 10th gen, touting it as the gaming king, but that's where it ends. In many situations, the 10700k comparatively does worse in my use case. When comparing it to it's 8 core rival, the 3700x or even the 3800x, the actual computational horsepower found in the Ryzen line begins to heavily outweigh the value of the 10700k. Sure, the Intel side of things comes with Z490 where overclocking the CPU and RAM to oblivion is possible, your frametimes and overall experience improves, but what does it cost you?The 14nm+++ that Intel baked the 10th Gen with is solid, still competing despite it essentially being a 6700K from late 2015 with 5-10% IPC uplift, and a few extra cores plopped on. The CPU finds itself needing to be cooled by beefy heatsinks, and AIO liquid coolers. Anything less and you'll the 10700k thermal throttling, making any clock speed gains virtually null. So now you've got a heat issue, but now lets talk about that 125w TDP... When you've got this thing running a stock settings, not edits to your bios, total system power consumption nearly doubles that of the 3800x. You've got a beefy cooling setup, so you decide to tack on a slight overclock to say... 5ghz all core. That bump pushes you north of 245w for just your CPU for a 2-5% increase in your frames.When you've got a 10700k drawing more than 245w, and lets say you've got deep pockets so you also own a 2080 Ti... you're going to find yourself having to spend more on a stronger PSU. So with that in mind, let's bring this around full circle, and why this CPU is good, but isn't something I'd personally recommend to a friend building a new rig. With Intel's 10th Gen, you're paying for fundamentally the same architecture from 2015. You're paying the K series CPU and Z chipset motherboard tax for overclocking, now add on the fact that you will more than likely need to drop another $70-150 on a good cooler, when you are already looking at $450 for the CPU, $180-$250 for a motherboard... that to me sounds like a deal breaker for the average consumer/gamer.The TL;DR here is: Unless you're chasing 240hz at 1080p, I strongly suggest you save a few bucks going with a 3700x or a 3800x. You can drop it into a B450/X470 motherboard, should the B550/X570 boards be unavailable or too high in price for you. The include stock cooler is impressive, and does an excellent job at keeping the big Ryzen chips cool, and your PC quiet too. You could then put those savings into other places in your rig. To further prove my point when it comes to this generation from Intel being a bit of a mess... A recent (review date, 9/18/20) analysis of sales data shows that the 10th Gen isn't selling nearly as much as the Ryzen series of products.On the other side of the camp, you've got products like the Ryzen 3300X that have been nearly impossible to purchase because of their insane value. For $120 MSRP, that quad core was pulling some numbers a lot higher than most would expect. Add on the fact that it's also got higher quality silicone binning, so now you can push a Ryzen chip to 4.6Ghz reliably... It's self explanatory.Why pay more, when you're not getting that much of a lead? I ended up returning this CPU, here's hoping 11th Gen can bring something to the table for someone who does workstation and gaming workloads like I do. I'd only really recommend this CPU if you're gaming, and even then I'd skip the 10700k and stick it out with a 10600k.
I was initially looking at the Ryzen Gen 3 chipsets. With the market demand for those chips, going with Intel meant better value for money. It was also a good choice in this market because it at least has a built-in video processor, and again, citing the current market, I wasn't sure when I might be able to get my hands on a new GPU. At least this chip would tide me over for playing games that would not be too demanding.After I committed to this chip, I realize that it would be a lightly better choice for dual-booting Linux (or using WSL2 Linux on Windows), since it seems that the Linux kernel is often developed around Intel chips, first. I can be disabused of that notion, but I feel confident that I won't have issues running Linux on this chip.This chip was ... MoreI was initially looking at the Ryzen Gen 3 chipsets. With the market demand for those chips, going with Intel meant better value for money. It was also a good choice in this market because it at least has a built-in video processor, and again, citing the current market, I wasn't sure when I might be able to get my hands on a new GPU. At least this chip would tide me over for playing games that would not be too demanding.After I committed to this chip, I realize that it would be a lightly better choice for dual-booting Linux (or using WSL2 Linux on Windows), since it seems that the Linux kernel is often developed around Intel chips, first. I can be disabused of that notion, but I feel confident that I won't have issues running Linux on this chip.This chip was also good, because at least one more generation will use the same LGA 1200 socket. That means that I have the option of upgrading to another Intel chip without having to buy another motherboard. However, who knows what the market will look like when I am ready to upgrade.This chip can also be overclocked, and that means more performance options, as well.The downside for this chip is really the socket. One more generation upgrade, true, but AMD has the right of it in developing their chips with the same socket gen after gen. It means that the motherboard with AMD sockets will have a longer life if the user doesn't want to be forced to upgrade.
This was a day one purchase for me and it seems clear I've either lost the silicon lottery, or a lot of people are fudging numbers/not being very stringent with stress testing. Running this on a 240mm custom loop, I've hit a voltage wall at around 1.44v @ x50 to be stable in Prime95 AVX. Vcore reads 1.314 at that load with LLC4, so I'm ok with the worryingly high BIOS input. Now there is a lot of controversy around whether P95 AVX is a valid stress test, as it is an incredibly unrealistic workload. My opinion on this is that the point of a stress test is to simulate unrealistic workloads at the far end of sanity, to ensure that your daily driver is rock stable. I can get nice low voltage overclocks if I avoid the nasty AVX loads, but that doesn't really seem fair. I ... MoreThis was a day one purchase for me and it seems clear I've either lost the silicon lottery, or a lot of people are fudging numbers/not being very stringent with stress testing. Running this on a 240mm custom loop, I've hit a voltage wall at around 1.44v @ x50 to be stable in Prime95 AVX. Vcore reads 1.314 at that load with LLC4, so I'm ok with the worryingly high BIOS input. Now there is a lot of controversy around whether P95 AVX is a valid stress test, as it is an incredibly unrealistic workload. My opinion on this is that the point of a stress test is to simulate unrealistic workloads at the far end of sanity, to ensure that your daily driver is rock stable. I can get nice low voltage overclocks if I avoid the nasty AVX loads, but that doesn't really seem fair. I think 5.1 is achievable, but requires a better bin and better cooling than I have to stay below 1.45v. There's also a question of memory speeds, as my memory is quite heavily overclocked as well (rated at 4400MHz CAS 19). Downclocking the memory might give me more headroom, but without more experimenting I suspect the performance dip in overall workloads might not be worth 100MHz of clock speed. If you're going to get into the nitty gritty of tweaking your CPU, I recommend moving up to the 10900k for the better binning. General results suggest the binning is much tighter for that SKU, so you'll have less of a silicon lottery problem. I'll probably do this myself after I finish this build in a few months. The egg I took off is pretty much exclusively for loose binning at this SKU. Relevant hardware: ASUS Z490-i Patriot Viper 2x8GB @ 4400MHz EKWB 240 PE, with about 500ml in the loop altogether, with 2x Noctua NF-F12 static pressure fans Ncase M1 (You will likely get better results with more space to move air, and more radiator space) I'll come back and edit this review in a few months if I have a different opinion once my new GPU and slim radiator arrive, and the build is complete.
| General | |
| Product Type | Processor |
| Width | 4.4 cm |
| Depth | 11.6 cm |
| Height | 10.1 cm |
