The 70-210mm f4 Di VC USD Lens from Tamron is a telephoto zoom lens with a stable aperture of f4 offering unvarying brightness and improved color over depth field on overall focal length. It is compatible with Canon EF full frame DSLRs. The lens comes with a 4-stop VC image stabilization that reduces camera shakes during handheld shooting. It has an Ultrasonic Silent Drive autofocus motor that delivers fast and quiet autofocus performance. The lens features a magnification factor of 0.32x. The rounded 9 blade diaphragm facilitates smooth and pleasing bokeh effect. The Arca-type compatibility provides stability when used on a tripod with an optional tripod collar. The lens also features a 52mm front filter thread attachment.
The 70-210mm f4 Di VC USD Lens from Tamron is a telephoto zoom lens with a stable aperture of f4 offering unvarying brightness and improved color over depth field on overall focal length. It is compatible with Canon EF full frame DSLRs. The lens comes with a 4-stop VC image stabilization that reduces camera shakes during handheld shooting. It has an Ultrasonic Silent Drive autofocus motor that delivers fast and quiet autofocus performance. The lens features a magnification factor of 0.32x. The rounded 9 blade diaphragm facilitates smooth and pleasing bokeh effect. The Arca-type compatibility provides stability when used on a tripod with an optional tripod collar. The lens also features a 52mm front filter thread attachment.
in 3 offers
The lowest price for Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD Lens for Canon right now is $871.20 at CameraClix, compared across 3 retailers.
The all-time low was $414.74 on 7 May 2026 — today's price is 110% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 27 June 2026.
Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD Lens for Canon
The 70-210mm f4 Di VC USD Lens from Tamron is a telephoto zoom lens with a stable aperture of f4 offering unvarying brightness and improved color over depth field on overall focal length. It is compatible with Canon EF full frame DSLRs. The lens comes with a 4-stop VC image stabilization that reduces camera shakes during handheld shooting. It has an Ultrasonic Silent Drive autofocus motor that delivers fast and quiet autofocus performance. The lens features a magnification factor of 0.32x. The rounded 9 blade diaphragm facilitates smooth and pleasing bokeh effect. The Arca-type compatibility provides stability when used on a tripod with an optional tripod collar. The lens also features a 52mm front filter thread attachment.
The 70-210mm f4 Di VC USD Lens from Tamron is a telephoto zoom lens with a stable aperture of f4 offering unvarying brightness and improved color over depth field on overall focal length. It is compatible with Canon EF full frame DSLRs. The lens comes with a 4-stop VC image stabilization that reduces camera shakes during handheld shooting. It has an Ultrasonic Silent Drive autofocus motor that delivers fast and quiet autofocus performance. The lens features a magnification factor of 0.32x. The rounded 9 blade diaphragm facilitates smooth and pleasing bokeh effect. The Arca-type compatibility provides stability when used on a tripod with an optional tripod collar. The lens also features a 52mm front filter thread attachment.
Last updated at 27/06/2026 20:23:45
Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD - Canon EF
Free delivery
Tamron 70-210mm F/4 Di VC USD Model A034
TAMRON 70-210mm F4 Di VC USD Model A034 for Canon
Delivery between 2–6 July $15.52
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
The terrific B&H sale inspired me to get this lens. My Tamron 70-300 vc usd had become less reliable and I was thinking about getting it repaired. But, spending $150 or more to repair a 9 year old lens made little sense when I could get a brand new, much more recently released fixed aperture lens for $369.My intitial impression was extremely positive. Opening up the box, I saw a beautiful lens. Sleek and slim. Once I put it on my cameras (D500, D610) I have rarely taken it off. Shooting with it is very enjoyable. One thing that sets this apart from all of my lenses, which were all more expensive, even those I bought used, is the internal zooming. Nothing external moves. Not even the front element. The body of my Sigma 14-24 does not move but the front element ... MoreThe terrific B&H sale inspired me to get this lens. My Tamron 70-300 vc usd had become less reliable and I was thinking about getting it repaired. But, spending $150 or more to repair a 9 year old lens made little sense when I could get a brand new, much more recently released fixed aperture lens for $369.My intitial impression was extremely positive. Opening up the box, I saw a beautiful lens. Sleek and slim. Once I put it on my cameras (D500, D610) I have rarely taken it off. Shooting with it is very enjoyable. One thing that sets this apart from all of my lenses, which were all more expensive, even those I bought used, is the internal zooming. Nothing external moves. Not even the front element. The body of my Sigma 14-24 does not move but the front element does.Now onto its performance. After using it for a while, I determined that it needn't af fine-tuning with the console. It required back focusing correction, particularly at 210mm. From the images I viewed before correction (I was usually able to examine sharpness if at a slightly different plane of focus than intended) and after, I can say that the sharpness is typically very good at f 4. Sharpness improves at F 5.6 and is very fine at f 8. At 210mm it does not rival my Tamron 70-300 zoomed to 300mm when shooting at distance. Those 90mm do matter. I don't think I will use it often for wildlife as I used my older Tamron at times. So, less versatile. I do have a Tamron 100-400 and a 150-600 G2, lenses more specialized for that pursuit. Focus is fast. I think it requires a more contrasty point of focus than my other lenses so can be somewhat erratic.Ca's are often present in high contrast areas but are not as strong as in my Tamron 35 and very easy to correct. One click. My impression of the bokeh is very positive.These are all still early impressions and subject to change (except for my feelings about its looks and handling). For value, handling, and looks 5 stars. I will dock it one point for af inconsistencies and ca's. The value all by itself would not prevent me from returning it if I felt the limitations of the lens frustrated me. My interest is in getting these great (to me) images. So, I am pleased. I can't necessarily recommend it to others as so many folks I meet online are much more demanding than I am in terms of sharpness. I don't know how well it would do on a camera with more than the 24mp of the D610. Focusing may be better on a camera with a newer af system. For now, I will give it four stars. These are still pretty early impressions. And, I am trying to be objective. Purely subjectively, I give it 4 3/4 stars. I enjoy shooting with it and that counts a great deal.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I've only taken the lens out once, but so far it has performed well. It's very light although quite long. One of the reviewers complained that it has a plasticky feel. Of course, these feelings are very subjective, but it didn't feel that way to me at all. Another person complained that it focuses slowly but didn't say what camera he is using. I can't help thinking if you have an old or low-end camera, you might get that result with just about any lens. I'm using it on a Canon 5Ds, which I recently bought new from B&H even though the camera came out five years ago, and I find this lens to focus very quickly. I haven't had time to analyze my photos, but if they're in any way inferior, I'll revise my review. In any case, I paid about a third for this lens than I would ... MoreI've only taken the lens out once, but so far it has performed well. It's very light although quite long. One of the reviewers complained that it has a plasticky feel. Of course, these feelings are very subjective, but it didn't feel that way to me at all. Another person complained that it focuses slowly but didn't say what camera he is using. I can't help thinking if you have an old or low-end camera, you might get that result with just about any lens. I'm using it on a Canon 5Ds, which I recently bought new from B&H even though the camera came out five years ago, and I find this lens to focus very quickly. I haven't had time to analyze my photos, but if they're in any way inferior, I'll revise my review. In any case, I paid about a third for this lens than I would have for a comparable Canon lens, and its performance appears to be excellent. The only downside of saving money on a third-party lens is that it doesn't hold its value the way a major manufacturer like Canon would. On the other hand, if you like the lens and plan on keeping it, so what?
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
I'm an event and sports photographer (mostly amateur running and triathlon events) and bought this lens due to low price and light weight. Just used it to shoot a 5K run fundraising event and was extremely pleased with the results using it on my Nikon Z6 with the FTZ adapter. Focus is snappy and the colors are rich and contrasty. For the price it's a fantastic lens. I will probably not use my Tamron 70-200mm f2.8 lens too much due to the weight difference between the 2 lenses. The photo quality is equal to the heavier lens. If you absolutely need f2.8 for darker environment then go for the heavier and more expensive lens but for me I prefer to carry lighter primes like 85mm f1.8 for darker environments.
| Focal Length | 70 to 210mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/32 |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF |
| Lens Format Coverage | Full-Frame |
Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD - Canon EF
Free delivery
Tamron 70-210mm F/4 Di VC USD Model A034
TAMRON 70-210mm F4 Di VC USD Model A034 for Canon
Delivery between 2–6 July $15.52
The terrific B&H sale inspired me to get this lens. My Tamron 70-300 vc usd had become less reliable and I was thinking about getting it repaired. But, spending $150 or more to repair a 9 year old lens made little sense when I could get a brand new, much more recently released fixed aperture lens for $369.My intitial impression was extremely positive. Opening up the box, I saw a beautiful lens. Sleek and slim. Once I put it on my cameras (D500, D610) I have rarely taken it off. Shooting with it is very enjoyable. One thing that sets this apart from all of my lenses, which were all more expensive, even those I bought used, is the internal zooming. Nothing external moves. Not even the front element. The body of my Sigma 14-24 does not move but the front element ... MoreThe terrific B&H sale inspired me to get this lens. My Tamron 70-300 vc usd had become less reliable and I was thinking about getting it repaired. But, spending $150 or more to repair a 9 year old lens made little sense when I could get a brand new, much more recently released fixed aperture lens for $369.My intitial impression was extremely positive. Opening up the box, I saw a beautiful lens. Sleek and slim. Once I put it on my cameras (D500, D610) I have rarely taken it off. Shooting with it is very enjoyable. One thing that sets this apart from all of my lenses, which were all more expensive, even those I bought used, is the internal zooming. Nothing external moves. Not even the front element. The body of my Sigma 14-24 does not move but the front element does.Now onto its performance. After using it for a while, I determined that it needn't af fine-tuning with the console. It required back focusing correction, particularly at 210mm. From the images I viewed before correction (I was usually able to examine sharpness if at a slightly different plane of focus than intended) and after, I can say that the sharpness is typically very good at f 4. Sharpness improves at F 5.6 and is very fine at f 8. At 210mm it does not rival my Tamron 70-300 zoomed to 300mm when shooting at distance. Those 90mm do matter. I don't think I will use it often for wildlife as I used my older Tamron at times. So, less versatile. I do have a Tamron 100-400 and a 150-600 G2, lenses more specialized for that pursuit. Focus is fast. I think it requires a more contrasty point of focus than my other lenses so can be somewhat erratic.Ca's are often present in high contrast areas but are not as strong as in my Tamron 35 and very easy to correct. One click. My impression of the bokeh is very positive.These are all still early impressions and subject to change (except for my feelings about its looks and handling). For value, handling, and looks 5 stars. I will dock it one point for af inconsistencies and ca's. The value all by itself would not prevent me from returning it if I felt the limitations of the lens frustrated me. My interest is in getting these great (to me) images. So, I am pleased. I can't necessarily recommend it to others as so many folks I meet online are much more demanding than I am in terms of sharpness. I don't know how well it would do on a camera with more than the 24mp of the D610. Focusing may be better on a camera with a newer af system. For now, I will give it four stars. These are still pretty early impressions. And, I am trying to be objective. Purely subjectively, I give it 4 3/4 stars. I enjoy shooting with it and that counts a great deal.
I've only taken the lens out once, but so far it has performed well. It's very light although quite long. One of the reviewers complained that it has a plasticky feel. Of course, these feelings are very subjective, but it didn't feel that way to me at all. Another person complained that it focuses slowly but didn't say what camera he is using. I can't help thinking if you have an old or low-end camera, you might get that result with just about any lens. I'm using it on a Canon 5Ds, which I recently bought new from B&H even though the camera came out five years ago, and I find this lens to focus very quickly. I haven't had time to analyze my photos, but if they're in any way inferior, I'll revise my review. In any case, I paid about a third for this lens than I would ... MoreI've only taken the lens out once, but so far it has performed well. It's very light although quite long. One of the reviewers complained that it has a plasticky feel. Of course, these feelings are very subjective, but it didn't feel that way to me at all. Another person complained that it focuses slowly but didn't say what camera he is using. I can't help thinking if you have an old or low-end camera, you might get that result with just about any lens. I'm using it on a Canon 5Ds, which I recently bought new from B&H even though the camera came out five years ago, and I find this lens to focus very quickly. I haven't had time to analyze my photos, but if they're in any way inferior, I'll revise my review. In any case, I paid about a third for this lens than I would have for a comparable Canon lens, and its performance appears to be excellent. The only downside of saving money on a third-party lens is that it doesn't hold its value the way a major manufacturer like Canon would. On the other hand, if you like the lens and plan on keeping it, so what?
I'm an event and sports photographer (mostly amateur running and triathlon events) and bought this lens due to low price and light weight. Just used it to shoot a 5K run fundraising event and was extremely pleased with the results using it on my Nikon Z6 with the FTZ adapter. Focus is snappy and the colors are rich and contrasty. For the price it's a fantastic lens. I will probably not use my Tamron 70-200mm f2.8 lens too much due to the weight difference between the 2 lenses. The photo quality is equal to the heavier lens. If you absolutely need f2.8 for darker environment then go for the heavier and more expensive lens but for me I prefer to carry lighter primes like 85mm f1.8 for darker environments.
This lens is truly the best in this focal length of lens. The Sharpness on both full frame and crop sensor DSLR's is outstanding. The functionality is simple a nd quite easy to use, I really enjoy the one-piece design without having telescoping barrel and I think that truly adds to the tremendous sharpness of the lens. Having a constant F4 is a real plus also. I highly recommend this lens to any Canon DSLR users or Nikon for that matter also. Tamron has a true winner with this lens.
This lens will give you sharp images with good color. Bokeh is smooth and pleasant. Please refer to attached images which are unedited from the RAW file, but cropped to show best detail: Coffee cup shot at 70mm @ f4.5 and bycyclist shot at 210mm @ f4.The build is solid and light enough to carry without discomfort for hours.I only caution buyers to test the lens' auto focus. It's quick and does well with my Canon 6D MkII, but there seems to be a bug that may apply to this lens. I use back button focusing, to which it is responsive, but when I press on the shutter button to take the exposure, the focus will occassionally shift rather slightly; just enough to ruin a shallow DoF image. I've checked the stabilization settings using the Tap In Console, and setting it ... MoreThis lens will give you sharp images with good color. Bokeh is smooth and pleasant. Please refer to attached images which are unedited from the RAW file, but cropped to show best detail: Coffee cup shot at 70mm @ f4.5 and bycyclist shot at 210mm @ f4.The build is solid and light enough to carry without discomfort for hours.I only caution buyers to test the lens' auto focus. It's quick and does well with my Canon 6D MkII, but there seems to be a bug that may apply to this lens. I use back button focusing, to which it is responsive, but when I press on the shutter button to take the exposure, the focus will occassionally shift rather slightly; just enough to ruin a shallow DoF image. I've checked the stabilization settings using the Tap In Console, and setting it to Capture seems to help, but not all the time. The only sure fire way to prevent this issue is to turn VC off.I'd give it three stars for this issue, but the savings in comparison to the Canon version is incredible, so that deserves a star in itself considering that the EF mount is all but officially dead.
I have the Tamron 70-210 f4 lens for one week and, to behonest, it was a purchase that was mainly driven by the generally positive reviews on the picture quality, despite the bargain price. And there is not the slightest regret having done that.Indeed, the lens provides very good quality over the entire zoom and focus range on a full frame as well as APS-C sensor. Manufacturing quality appears to be high standard.Generally, you have to be used to relatively heavy lenses. Theimage stabilizer does a good job (handheld done at 210 mm with 1/30sec) but I must do more testing.The auto focus is the weak point of the lens. It would need improvements if the lens should be used for sports and wildlife. If you don’t regularly need quick responses for adjustment of large ... MoreI have the Tamron 70-210 f4 lens for one week and, to behonest, it was a purchase that was mainly driven by the generally positive reviews on the picture quality, despite the bargain price. And there is not the slightest regret having done that.Indeed, the lens provides very good quality over the entire zoom and focus range on a full frame as well as APS-C sensor. Manufacturing quality appears to be high standard.Generally, you have to be used to relatively heavy lenses. Theimage stabilizer does a good job (handheld done at 210 mm with 1/30sec) but I must do more testing.The auto focus is the weak point of the lens. It would need improvements if the lens should be used for sports and wildlife. If you don’t regularly need quick responses for adjustment of large distance differences (from far to close or vice versa) e.g. portrait studio, it works well. Yet manual override is possible.One point which irritated me is the placement of the focus and focal length rings. I am used to have the ring for the focal length closer to the body of the camera and the focus ring at the end of the lens. This lens provides it revers. Yet it is a matter of getting used to (but if the other zoom lenses do it the other way you might have to make a practice at lens change).Due to the Corona Pandemic my test photos were limited to my garden.All in all, for my purposes it is a great addition to my other lenses, and I can recommend it wholeheartedly particularly to all photographers who operate under a tight budget.
I was quite happy to get this lens (Nikon F mount) for less than $400; two days later I see it's on backorder and the price is now $600. Glad I didn't hesitate.Let me just say that I've read the negative reviews and I'm unimpressed with their lucidity. Here's the bottom line - this is an excellent mid range telephoto lens with good performance that will equal any other glass you put on a 24MP FX Nikon and print at up to 12x18 inches. Don't get me started on web page photos or even worse, cell phones and instagram. Anything looks good on a phone screen. Web pages are limited by display resolution and color calibration, not at all by which Tamron or Nikon or Sigma lens you used. And just don't bring up video at all, ok? If you want to do video use a video lens, not a ... MoreI was quite happy to get this lens (Nikon F mount) for less than $400; two days later I see it's on backorder and the price is now $600. Glad I didn't hesitate.Let me just say that I've read the negative reviews and I'm unimpressed with their lucidity. Here's the bottom line - this is an excellent mid range telephoto lens with good performance that will equal any other glass you put on a 24MP FX Nikon and print at up to 12x18 inches. Don't get me started on web page photos or even worse, cell phones and instagram. Anything looks good on a phone screen. Web pages are limited by display resolution and color calibration, not at all by which Tamron or Nikon or Sigma lens you used. And just don't bring up video at all, ok? If you want to do video use a video lens, not a photo lens. This is a photo lens.Ok so I own the Nikon 70-200mm f/4. I would say the Tamron is just as good on my D750 and I wouldn't use anything other than the Nikon on my D850. I wouldn't use either one on a Z6 or Z7. Use native Z glass if you go that route. This lens is just great for 24MP and probably not quite good enough for 46MP.Some reviewers whined that the plastic is too smooth. Seems fine to me. Others complained that the zoom ring is at the end instead of the middle. Hey, at one third or one fourth of the price, I can live with that.So I just got the lens, took few test shots. Focus accuracy is spot on, no adjustment needed. VR system works well enough to shoot 210mm at 1/60 sec hand held reliably. The lens meters exposure just as accurately as any of my Nikon lenses. Edge to edge sharpness at f5.6 looks good at normal display sizes. Geometric distortion is minimal and easily corrected in post processing. Happy to see Made in Vietnam on the lens barrel. The lens is light but feels tight, smooth, and professional quality. I will try to limit this to f5.6 because I suspect there will be some significant vignetting and loss of edge sharpness at f/4. Nikon kit lenses are worse. I'm thinking this would be a great portrait lens since you need telephoto to get some distance from your subject, you aren't looking for ultimate resolution, you will likely be shooting at 24MP or less, and you need f5.6 or greater for portraits anyway. This is all with full frame sensors; guys with DX cameras can figure out their own stuff. I think this lens will be awesome on my D500. Obviously not a landscape lens but none of these mid range zooms are. Not a lens for a D850 or Z7 but hey, $400. Buy the couple thousand dollar version for your high megapixel beast. Yeah I have a D850 and honestly I like the D810 better. Sometimes I like the D750 or the D500 better. Nice that the D850 is two cameras in one though - a 46MP FX and virtually a clone of the 20MP D500 shooting in DX mode.Oh yeah the Tamron zoom. Good lens, buy it.
I'm a serious enthusiast photographer. Several people were telling me that I needed to get a 70-200 f/2.8. I had been using the Tamron 16-300 which is nice but nowhere near the same class of lens as these others. The closest price range I could eventually afford was to buy either a used Canon or new Tamron 70-200. I had been looking at the 70-210 as an alternate choice even though it isn't quite as fast. However, when the price drop occurred, the decision was easily made for buying this lens. The construction of the lens is solid. I like the wide focus ring. I have the 45mm in this series of lenses and the quality of this lens is just as good if not better. This lens is giving me excellent photos. The detail in the images is very good, the color is sharp, and I get ... MoreI'm a serious enthusiast photographer. Several people were telling me that I needed to get a 70-200 f/2.8. I had been using the Tamron 16-300 which is nice but nowhere near the same class of lens as these others. The closest price range I could eventually afford was to buy either a used Canon or new Tamron 70-200. I had been looking at the 70-210 as an alternate choice even though it isn't quite as fast. However, when the price drop occurred, the decision was easily made for buying this lens. The construction of the lens is solid. I like the wide focus ring. I have the 45mm in this series of lenses and the quality of this lens is just as good if not better. This lens is giving me excellent photos. The detail in the images is very good, the color is sharp, and I get nice bokeh with it. This lens was the perfect combination of cost and value for me.
I've owned several 70-200 2.8's in my 50 years on this rock, to include Canon and Pentax. So I'm not easily impressed by anything I encounter. Canon has held first for reliability, Nikon first for image quality. Pentax images very good, horrible reliability. Professionally, I usually don't use this focal length for anything other than fun. I'll use a quality 85mm for portraits before I'd ever use a telephoto--I think it's a pain in the rearend. I haven't had a 70-200 for quite a while due to extra dead weight in my kit. I found myself coming back after seeing some of the reviews of Tamrons new lenses. I had bought a version 1 24-70 Tamron, and loved the image quality, liked the AF, but it was so GIANT. Went with Nikon 24-70 and took a financial beating. ... MoreI've owned several 70-200 2.8's in my 50 years on this rock, to include Canon and Pentax. So I'm not easily impressed by anything I encounter. Canon has held first for reliability, Nikon first for image quality. Pentax images very good, horrible reliability. Professionally, I usually don't use this focal length for anything other than fun. I'll use a quality 85mm for portraits before I'd ever use a telephoto--I think it's a pain in the rearend. I haven't had a 70-200 for quite a while due to extra dead weight in my kit. I found myself coming back after seeing some of the reviews of Tamrons new lenses. I had bought a version 1 24-70 Tamron, and loved the image quality, liked the AF, but it was so GIANT. Went with Nikon 24-70 and took a financial beating. Anyway--recent reviews peaked my interest in the 24-70 G2. Bought one, and it's incredible! Made some of my primes look weak. I previously owned an A009 last series Tamron 70-200, and it was pretty soft, didn't care for it, sold it. Recently read up on the 70-200 2.8 G2. Shot some images at a local store. Loved it, couldn't bring myself to spend $1,200.00 (My wife would complain, for sure.) So I found myself looking for another 70-200--I just missed the range. So we have this guy, 70-210 F4. It's only one stop different. Rave reviews. Found a KILLER deal with B&H, ordered it. Came to me like a Star Trek teleporter--Ordered at 5:45 Black Friday. Arrives Monday! Anyway, been playing around with it in my dark house at 12,800 on my D850. Locks focus really well, and the vibration control is good for at least 3 stops. And super sharp out of the box, I don't have the tap in console--I can only image what that would do. It's really unbelievable at $799.00. I paid way less than that, and it's a steal. Buy it, try it, you won't return it. And B&H just became the only place I'll order from. Forget the other guys in New York.
I had been looking at this lens and when B&H had a sale I decided to purchase. Very impressed with the lens, and the sale price was an added bonus. While this lens might not be as sharp as the Tamron SP offerings, the sharpness is so close I can accept it. This lens gives me the range of a much larger and heavier 70-200 2.8 G2 and I can hand hold and carry as a travel / walk around lens. I do not need a tripod with this lens so that gives me much more flexibility over the larger 2.8 version.The autofocus is quick and accurate on my Canon DSLR's and EOS RP.My only comment would be the ergonomics. The zoom ring is at the end of the lens. This doesn't bother me as much as the fact that you can't access the zoom ring with the hood reversed. Not a big deal unless you ... MoreI had been looking at this lens and when B&H had a sale I decided to purchase. Very impressed with the lens, and the sale price was an added bonus. While this lens might not be as sharp as the Tamron SP offerings, the sharpness is so close I can accept it. This lens gives me the range of a much larger and heavier 70-200 2.8 G2 and I can hand hold and carry as a travel / walk around lens. I do not need a tripod with this lens so that gives me much more flexibility over the larger 2.8 version.The autofocus is quick and accurate on my Canon DSLR's and EOS RP.My only comment would be the ergonomics. The zoom ring is at the end of the lens. This doesn't bother me as much as the fact that you can't access the zoom ring with the hood reversed. Not a big deal unless you are needing to get a quick shot and grab the camera/lens out of the bag without mounting the hood.Even at the full MSRP this lens is a bargain. The lens hood is included unlike Canon's non-L lenses. Unless you are needed absolute tack sharp images for larger prints, this lens is great. I can't tell much difference between this lens and the 70-200 2.8 G2 in prints up to 12X18.
| Focal Length | 70 to 210mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/32 |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF |
| Lens Format Coverage | Full-Frame |
