Last updated at 02/07/2026 22:27:20
Canon RF 14-35mm f4L is Lens - AU Version
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $9.90
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery between 9–14 July $8.95
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM Lens
Delivery between 8–13 July $21.20
Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Zoom
Free delivery
Canon RF 14-35mm f4 L IS USM
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM Lens
Free delivery between 9–16 July
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens with 5 Year Warranty Full Frame
Delivery $26.90
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $15
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM
Free delivery
originally posted on adorama.com
Have only had a few outings with this new lens, but so far - it has been a stellar performer. As a landscape photographer and backpacker, lens weight and size are a big consideration for what I am hauling around for days in the mountains. This lens is very light weight and compact for a lens in its class and the image quality from my first outings have been outstanding.Lens build quality appears to be what you would expect from a Canon "L" lens. My first shoot was in some pretty rough conditions, and this lens suffered no apparent ill effects.The few negatives so far, at 14mm noticeable vignetting is present, with a low profile adapter from 77mm to 82mm and a filter attached vignetting was quite pronounced. Not a deal breaker, but something to be aware of. The ... MoreHave only had a few outings with this new lens, but so far - it has been a stellar performer. As a landscape photographer and backpacker, lens weight and size are a big consideration for what I am hauling around for days in the mountains. This lens is very light weight and compact for a lens in its class and the image quality from my first outings have been outstanding.Lens build quality appears to be what you would expect from a Canon "L" lens. My first shoot was in some pretty rough conditions, and this lens suffered no apparent ill effects.The few negatives so far, at 14mm noticeable vignetting is present, with a low profile adapter from 77mm to 82mm and a filter attached vignetting was quite pronounced. Not a deal breaker, but something to be aware of. The other consideration is the cost! This is an expensive lens; $700.00 more than the 16-15 f/4 L EF version - also an outstanding lens! --- Worth it?? For me; yes.Overall I am extremely pleased with this lens, and for my longer treks it will take the place of my 15-35 2.8 L - and possibly be my go-to after I have had more time with it.
originally posted on adorama.com
I'm going to compare this to the 15-35 f/2.8 version for explaining my pros and cons. I have used the 16-35 f/2.8 III for many years, so there was a level of expectation that was relatively high.f/4 is the starting aperture for many landscape and wide angle photography needs. f/2.8 is great for low light, but if not in that situation, the f/4 option is perfectly fine, even as far as pro standards go. At wide angles, you won't notice depth of field nearly as much anyway. So with that intro, this lens is a good lens to have. It's light and it goes to 14mm which is incredible and it's a significant smaller price tag to the 15-35 f/2.8.However, the 14mm without lens profile adjustments is somewhat useless in the corners. Very strong vignetting. It's not as noticeable ... MoreI'm going to compare this to the 15-35 f/2.8 version for explaining my pros and cons. I have used the 16-35 f/2.8 III for many years, so there was a level of expectation that was relatively high.f/4 is the starting aperture for many landscape and wide angle photography needs. f/2.8 is great for low light, but if not in that situation, the f/4 option is perfectly fine, even as far as pro standards go. At wide angles, you won't notice depth of field nearly as much anyway. So with that intro, this lens is a good lens to have. It's light and it goes to 14mm which is incredible and it's a significant smaller price tag to the 15-35 f/2.8.However, the 14mm without lens profile adjustments is somewhat useless in the corners. Very strong vignetting. It's not as noticeable for video as it'll ignore the full frame corners, so for real estate video and the like it's a great lens. You likely wouldn't go wider than f/4 for that in most situations anyway. Unfortunately, though, if you do lens profile adjustments it will crop the images by removing distortion. This results in making it appear tighter than 14mm, thus removing one of the selling points. I will say it does apply a good quality distortion correction, so if you aren't needing every original pixel in the shot, you may really like the result.So if you don't need f/2.8 with the 15-35 counterpart, keep in mind what you gain when you get a wider aperture. You can stop it down to f/4 and avoid the strong vignette. But that comes as a price, and maybe 14 is more important than the vignette benefits of the 15 starting focal length.All in all, I think the 14-35 is a good lens. I don't think it's great coming from years of using the 16-35 f/2.8 III, but it's still very much a pro level lens. Every photographer who has gotten used to having 2.8 lenses likely has a hard time ever settling for a starting aperture that is smaller, but when it comes to ultra wide angle photography, most will never know the difference between f/2.8 and f/4 besides the shooter.For me, the vignetting is why I couldn't keep this lens. The aperture wasn't something I felt I was missing. So if you're ok with lens profile adjustments, I really think this is a high quality lens.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
The focal length of this lens is very nice for landscape, real estate, and some all-around photos. I liked the final outcome of the photos after software correction. However, quite a bit of the photo was lost due to what in my opinion is very heavy vignetting and barrel distortion. Without software correction the corners are dark and for example doorways near the edges of the photo come out warped into a rounded appearance. I seriously suggest considering the 15-35 L lens if you ever look at raw files prior to correction.
| Focal Length | 14 to 35mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 |
| Lens Mount | Canon RF |
| Format Compatibility | Full-Frame |
Canon RF 14-35mm f4L is Lens - AU Version
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $9.90
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery between 9–14 July $8.95
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM Lens
Delivery between 8–13 July $21.20
Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Zoom
Free delivery
Have only had a few outings with this new lens, but so far - it has been a stellar performer. As a landscape photographer and backpacker, lens weight and size are a big consideration for what I am hauling around for days in the mountains. This lens is very light weight and compact for a lens in its class and the image quality from my first outings have been outstanding.Lens build quality appears to be what you would expect from a Canon "L" lens. My first shoot was in some pretty rough conditions, and this lens suffered no apparent ill effects.The few negatives so far, at 14mm noticeable vignetting is present, with a low profile adapter from 77mm to 82mm and a filter attached vignetting was quite pronounced. Not a deal breaker, but something to be aware of. The ... MoreHave only had a few outings with this new lens, but so far - it has been a stellar performer. As a landscape photographer and backpacker, lens weight and size are a big consideration for what I am hauling around for days in the mountains. This lens is very light weight and compact for a lens in its class and the image quality from my first outings have been outstanding.Lens build quality appears to be what you would expect from a Canon "L" lens. My first shoot was in some pretty rough conditions, and this lens suffered no apparent ill effects.The few negatives so far, at 14mm noticeable vignetting is present, with a low profile adapter from 77mm to 82mm and a filter attached vignetting was quite pronounced. Not a deal breaker, but something to be aware of. The other consideration is the cost! This is an expensive lens; $700.00 more than the 16-15 f/4 L EF version - also an outstanding lens! --- Worth it?? For me; yes.Overall I am extremely pleased with this lens, and for my longer treks it will take the place of my 15-35 2.8 L - and possibly be my go-to after I have had more time with it.
I'm going to compare this to the 15-35 f/2.8 version for explaining my pros and cons. I have used the 16-35 f/2.8 III for many years, so there was a level of expectation that was relatively high.f/4 is the starting aperture for many landscape and wide angle photography needs. f/2.8 is great for low light, but if not in that situation, the f/4 option is perfectly fine, even as far as pro standards go. At wide angles, you won't notice depth of field nearly as much anyway. So with that intro, this lens is a good lens to have. It's light and it goes to 14mm which is incredible and it's a significant smaller price tag to the 15-35 f/2.8.However, the 14mm without lens profile adjustments is somewhat useless in the corners. Very strong vignetting. It's not as noticeable ... MoreI'm going to compare this to the 15-35 f/2.8 version for explaining my pros and cons. I have used the 16-35 f/2.8 III for many years, so there was a level of expectation that was relatively high.f/4 is the starting aperture for many landscape and wide angle photography needs. f/2.8 is great for low light, but if not in that situation, the f/4 option is perfectly fine, even as far as pro standards go. At wide angles, you won't notice depth of field nearly as much anyway. So with that intro, this lens is a good lens to have. It's light and it goes to 14mm which is incredible and it's a significant smaller price tag to the 15-35 f/2.8.However, the 14mm without lens profile adjustments is somewhat useless in the corners. Very strong vignetting. It's not as noticeable for video as it'll ignore the full frame corners, so for real estate video and the like it's a great lens. You likely wouldn't go wider than f/4 for that in most situations anyway. Unfortunately, though, if you do lens profile adjustments it will crop the images by removing distortion. This results in making it appear tighter than 14mm, thus removing one of the selling points. I will say it does apply a good quality distortion correction, so if you aren't needing every original pixel in the shot, you may really like the result.So if you don't need f/2.8 with the 15-35 counterpart, keep in mind what you gain when you get a wider aperture. You can stop it down to f/4 and avoid the strong vignette. But that comes as a price, and maybe 14 is more important than the vignette benefits of the 15 starting focal length.All in all, I think the 14-35 is a good lens. I don't think it's great coming from years of using the 16-35 f/2.8 III, but it's still very much a pro level lens. Every photographer who has gotten used to having 2.8 lenses likely has a hard time ever settling for a starting aperture that is smaller, but when it comes to ultra wide angle photography, most will never know the difference between f/2.8 and f/4 besides the shooter.For me, the vignetting is why I couldn't keep this lens. The aperture wasn't something I felt I was missing. So if you're ok with lens profile adjustments, I really think this is a high quality lens.
The focal length of this lens is very nice for landscape, real estate, and some all-around photos. I liked the final outcome of the photos after software correction. However, quite a bit of the photo was lost due to what in my opinion is very heavy vignetting and barrel distortion. Without software correction the corners are dark and for example doorways near the edges of the photo come out warped into a rounded appearance. I seriously suggest considering the 15-35 L lens if you ever look at raw files prior to correction.
I have used the canon 17-40 mm zoom lens for years. Last year I bought the canon R5 and have been using the 17-40 with the adapter and it's been fine. Recently I decided to purchase a dedicated RF Lens.I read the reviews on this lens and they were mixed, but I have to say this is a fabulous Lens! I have no issues with this lens and I absolutely love it. I love the extra wide view that it gives just those three extra millimeters is amazing. I have no issues processing the images in Lightroom. For whatever reason the exact correct lens doesn't pop up in the correction box one of the lenses on that list works every time. I will also say when you shoot raw that it pops up in the dialogue box every time. If you shoot JPEG's for some reason it doesn't show up exactly ... MoreI have used the canon 17-40 mm zoom lens for years. Last year I bought the canon R5 and have been using the 17-40 with the adapter and it's been fine. Recently I decided to purchase a dedicated RF Lens.I read the reviews on this lens and they were mixed, but I have to say this is a fabulous Lens! I have no issues with this lens and I absolutely love it. I love the extra wide view that it gives just those three extra millimeters is amazing. I have no issues processing the images in Lightroom. For whatever reason the exact correct lens doesn't pop up in the correction box one of the lenses on that list works every time. I will also say when you shoot raw that it pops up in the dialogue box every time. If you shoot JPEG's for some reason it doesn't show up exactly correct, but it doesn't matter the 10-22 or 15 mm will work. And of course if needed you can always adjust manually. But about the lens I absolutely love it. I love that it's a little smaller and lighter and dedicated to my R5 and I'm not fooling around with the adapter ring. For me it is really the perfect lens for doing interior architectural shots.
Got this on the current sale for $400 off and I've used this on a couple of video shoots for walk and talk videos with associated b roll and I absolutely love it. It's a great focal range and covers about 95 percent of the shots that I want to get. I had a different lens that was 14-24 and hardly ever used it, because that focal range was too specialized. Another great feature is that the lens is very light weight, so on a gimbal it's easier on the battery life than the previous lens I was using (sigma 24-105, f4). I love the image quality, and the look of the lens the wider it gets. I don't mind that it's F4. I also plan on using it on the wide shot when I do live performances, and I'm sure it will come in just as handy giving me the flexibility I need to adjust to ... MoreGot this on the current sale for $400 off and I've used this on a couple of video shoots for walk and talk videos with associated b roll and I absolutely love it. It's a great focal range and covers about 95 percent of the shots that I want to get. I had a different lens that was 14-24 and hardly ever used it, because that focal range was too specialized. Another great feature is that the lens is very light weight, so on a gimbal it's easier on the battery life than the previous lens I was using (sigma 24-105, f4). I love the image quality, and the look of the lens the wider it gets. I don't mind that it's F4. I also plan on using it on the wide shot when I do live performances, and I'm sure it will come in just as handy giving me the flexibility I need to adjust to the different performance venues I record in, whether I'm using full frame or super 35 camera for the master shot.
In other reviews, I understand the dismay at the vignetting in the raw image, but since it disappears like magic when Lightroom uses the correction for this lens, let me start this review by saying: modern digital images are made to be corrected and I've had to get used to that, so that I have to with this lens doesn't bother me.Because this is a superb lens in every other respect-lightweight, especially compared to the beautiful RF 15-35 2.8 brick; it's small enough for easy portability, and reasonably priced. And the images are excellent-I can easily look past the easily correctable vignetting.Maybe my acceptance and appreciation comes from shooting long enough when the neighborhood camera store shooed people away from anything wider than 28mm due to ... MoreIn other reviews, I understand the dismay at the vignetting in the raw image, but since it disappears like magic when Lightroom uses the correction for this lens, let me start this review by saying: modern digital images are made to be corrected and I've had to get used to that, so that I have to with this lens doesn't bother me.Because this is a superb lens in every other respect-lightweight, especially compared to the beautiful RF 15-35 2.8 brick; it's small enough for easy portability, and reasonably priced. And the images are excellent-I can easily look past the easily correctable vignetting.Maybe my acceptance and appreciation comes from shooting long enough when the neighborhood camera store shooed people away from anything wider than 28mm due to distortion.Early attempts to get below 20mm and not have an increasingly fisheyed image were big, cumbersome, expensive lenses, and for all that, marginally effective. And correcting for the distortion in the darkroom usually meant cropping to the center, effectively eliminating the wide view we really wanted. Those days are long gone, but the memories still guide me now.Now, for example, the RF 14-35 has little distortion on the edges at 14mm, and the need for correction in Lightroom is very minimal as well.Canon continued the somewhat weird zoom mechanism I have with their RF 15-35 2.8, where 14mm is actually to the left of "center", and neutral is at 20mm. It's more curious than annoying, but worth mentioning.One of my reasons for switching to mirrorless was to get back to the smaller-even if not really lighter-camera bodies I carried for years when shooting film. The R5 finally enticed me to make the plunge, and the RF lenses are uniformly above the EF lenses they replace. Even the non-L RFs I own are excellent lenses, and are far lighter than their L counterpart.I sold my RF 15-35 to buy the 14-35 just for the weight, size and cost savings over the 2.8. The weight of digital is hard to avoid, but I'm succeeding with the smaller L and non-L lenses, and I don't seem to be giving up any quality in the image. By these criteria, Canon seems to be doing a pretty amazing job at design and execution.
I bought this to replace my EF 16-35 f/4L, as I'm now using an EOS R5. Having read several excellent reviews and trying a friend's 14-35, I had an idea of what to expect, and the reality matches.The good: Excellent range of angle-of-view, light, compact, and good-to-excellent image quality at all FLs.The not-so-good: As reviewers said, the lens vignettes at the short end and is my softest L-lens at the long end. The images look fine until they're viewed at half-size or larger magnification. It's unfortunate that Canon's design decisions/tradeoffs resulted in these shortcomings. Also, interestingly, the FoV at 14mm is noticeably narrower than with my EF 14 f/2.8 L (II). I think this is mostly the result of default lens correction (cropping) done by processing ... MoreI bought this to replace my EF 16-35 f/4L, as I'm now using an EOS R5. Having read several excellent reviews and trying a friend's 14-35, I had an idea of what to expect, and the reality matches.The good: Excellent range of angle-of-view, light, compact, and good-to-excellent image quality at all FLs.The not-so-good: As reviewers said, the lens vignettes at the short end and is my softest L-lens at the long end. The images look fine until they're viewed at half-size or larger magnification. It's unfortunate that Canon's design decisions/tradeoffs resulted in these shortcomings. Also, interestingly, the FoV at 14mm is noticeably narrower than with my EF 14 f/2.8 L (II). I think this is mostly the result of default lens correction (cropping) done by processing apps like Lightroom and Capture One, but of course I can't be sure.The redeeming: Imaging shortcomings can generally be overcome in post with a bit of effort.Bottom line: I don't know of a lens that can do what this lens does, and it's a good complement to the RF 24-105L; just be prepared to do a bit of extra processing to pull L quality from this lens.
If you are doing any landscape or wide field this lens does the job. It is well built and feels like a quality product. You need be close to your point of interest as in your model face to ge the most out of the AF functions. The AF works like a champ in this scenario. However the AF does struggle wide open in lower light at distance when trying to catch eyes. In bright light is generally finds the subject. Over all the cost is stupid high for the focal range and the aperture of F2.8. I expected more from the AF but that could just be me? I usually shoot in manual mode anyway. I plan on using this lens for astro in manual mode so this lens fits the bill. However for anything else I will need another lens. My recommendation is to skip this lens in favor of a sigma EF ... MoreIf you are doing any landscape or wide field this lens does the job. It is well built and feels like a quality product. You need be close to your point of interest as in your model face to ge the most out of the AF functions. The AF works like a champ in this scenario. However the AF does struggle wide open in lower light at distance when trying to catch eyes. In bright light is generally finds the subject. Over all the cost is stupid high for the focal range and the aperture of F2.8. I expected more from the AF but that could just be me? I usually shoot in manual mode anyway. I plan on using this lens for astro in manual mode so this lens fits the bill. However for anything else I will need another lens. My recommendation is to skip this lens in favor of a sigma EF prime or canon EF prime lens unless you really need a flexible 15-35mm zoom for wide use. If your goal is general photography then buy the 24-70mm RF as it will be a more useful focal range. This will be my next lens purchase.
With the new Lightroom lens profile out, the wide end of this lens cleans up really well. If you didn't know such extreme corrections were being made, you may not suspect it. (Go into Lightroom and toggle on/off the profile correction). The corrections do trim the edges a bit, and I'm not sure if it's still a true 14mm after corrections, or maybe it was even wider before so that the adjusted image lands around 14mm. Regardless, I really have no complaints with most of the zoom range. But where this lens falls down is at 35mm. It is super soft, and features chromatic aberation at 35mm. This is a super important end of the zoom range for this lens, as it is where you can achieve a normal focal length for an environmental portrait. But it just doesn't deliver at 35. ... MoreWith the new Lightroom lens profile out, the wide end of this lens cleans up really well. If you didn't know such extreme corrections were being made, you may not suspect it. (Go into Lightroom and toggle on/off the profile correction). The corrections do trim the edges a bit, and I'm not sure if it's still a true 14mm after corrections, or maybe it was even wider before so that the adjusted image lands around 14mm. Regardless, I really have no complaints with most of the zoom range. But where this lens falls down is at 35mm. It is super soft, and features chromatic aberation at 35mm. This is a super important end of the zoom range for this lens, as it is where you can achieve a normal focal length for an environmental portrait. But it just doesn't deliver at 35. Also, the lens features a 0.38x magnification at 35mm, which I found unusable because of softness. This was one aspect of this lens I planned to use a lot, as 0.38 would make it the closest focusing lens in my collection.It was hard to return this lens because this does fit a niche for which there is literally no alternative. That niche being a light, compact UWA RF mount zoom. I wanted it to work. I will probably end up with the 15-35 2.8, which I was hoping to avoid due to weight and size. But bottom line is at this price I found the flaws just not worth it. If it ever fell to about $1100, where it's predecessor was priced I might consider it in the future.
I originally rented this lens for a project and then immediately turned around and bought it. For the size, weight, aperture, and performance of this lens it is a real gem. The maximum aperture of F/4 does not bother me for a wide angle lens and I would happily trade one stop of light for the small size and weight advantage. Standard screw on filters will work however I noticed a very slight vignette. A slim screw on filter might not vignette at all. I was using NiSi TrueColor ND with a filter ring adapter.It does rely heavily on software lens correction but it was never a problem for any photo or video I used it for.
| Focal Length | 14 to 35mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/4 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 |
| Lens Mount | Canon RF |
| Format Compatibility | Full-Frame |
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L Is USM Lens
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
in 34 offers
The lowest price for Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L Is USM Lens right now is $1,848.00 at Georges Cameras, compared across 28 retailers.
The all-time low was $1,239.83 on 9 May 2026 — today's price is 49% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 2 July 2026.
