Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L Is USM Lens
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
The Canon RF 14-35mm F/4.0 L IS USM is a light wide-angle lens that's suitable for full-frame mirrorless cameras by Canon. The wide viewing angle of the lens makes it very suitable for landscape and architectural photography. The RF 14-35mm f/4.0 L IS USM only weighs 540g, so it's easy to carry all day long. The 5.5 stops image stabilization allows you to even take sharp photos in low light. The light intensity of the lens remains the same when you zoom in. Thanks to this, you don't have to adjust the lighting for your photo after zooming in or out. The casing of the lens is waterproof and dustproof, so you can use the lens in all kinds of circumstances.
in 34 offers
The lowest price for Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L Is USM Lens right now is $1,848.00 at Amazon.com.au, compared across 27 retailers.
The all-time low was $88.00 on 25 May 2026 — today's price is 2000% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before — worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 29 June 2026.
Last updated at 29/06/2026 22:55:54
Canon RF 14-35mm f4L is Lens - AU Version
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $7.95
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $9.90
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Free delivery between Tue – Sat
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Free delivery between 2–9 July
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery between 2–7 July $12.90
Canon RF 14-35mm F4 L IS USM Lens RF Mount Camera Lens - Best For Landscape Photography
Free delivery between Wed – Thu
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4 L IS USM Lens
Delivery between 3–8 July $21.20
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens with 5 Year Warranty Full Frame
Delivery $26.90
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $15
originally posted on canon.com
I was originally going to write a scathing review of this lens. As it turns out, the issue I was having wasn't with the lens at all, it was the software I was using (Lightroom Classic). I was experiencing terrible vignetteing and barrel distortion that was especially noticeable when shooting wide. Lightroom was reading the meta data correctly but was not applying the correct profile in the develop module. Now that I've discovered that, I am totally thrilled with this lens. It is every bit as good as my EF 16-35L that this replaced. Excellent for landscapes and works great for architectural applications as well. I just can't believe I was ready to sell this lens and go back to the EF 16-35L. This lens will be going with me everywhere.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
Sharp and nice color just like any other L lenses. Focuses very close. It is not macro but good for flowers and any other larger objects.Uncorrected, there is significant vignetting. Once correction is applied, there is no problem. I do not mind the uncorrected image as I often like to crop to 16:9. The vignetting is off the image and I get a view wider than 14mm. It is ok for some of the shots I take.One negative is there is significant lens breathing.
originally posted on bhphotovideo.com
Have had this lens for a little better than a week now. This lens represents another step in the process to convert all my EF glass to RF. I shot the EF16-35mm f2.8 v ll for several years. It was one of the lens that I used the most. So I think that I'm probably qualified to make a comparison. One of the reasons that I wanted to replace the EF version was that I felt that it wasn't as sharp as I would like. My regular work flow almost always involved sharpening. Now that I have shot with the RF f4 version for a couple of extended shoots, I think that I can provide a useful review. The size difference is nice, so is the weight and filter size. For sharpness, compared to the EF 16-35mm f2.8 vll. the RF f4 version is in my opinion sharper. No need to sharpen anything ... MoreHave had this lens for a little better than a week now. This lens represents another step in the process to convert all my EF glass to RF. I shot the EF16-35mm f2.8 v ll for several years. It was one of the lens that I used the most. So I think that I'm probably qualified to make a comparison. One of the reasons that I wanted to replace the EF version was that I felt that it wasn't as sharp as I would like. My regular work flow almost always involved sharpening. Now that I have shot with the RF f4 version for a couple of extended shoots, I think that I can provide a useful review. The size difference is nice, so is the weight and filter size. For sharpness, compared to the EF 16-35mm f2.8 vll. the RF f4 version is in my opinion sharper. No need to sharpen anything so far. However; the barrel distortion @ 14mm is heavier than I anticipated. Since Adobe hasn't got a profile for this lens yet. I had to make my own. Kind of a pain, but doable. Overall, I LOVE this lens. The difference between 16mm and 14mm is amazing. I certainly don't miss the added weight of the EF version either (even though not a great difference). Highly recommended. One star subtracted for the barrel distortation.
| Lens system | |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.2 m |
| Maximum aperture number | 22 |
| Lens mount interface | Canon RF |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
Canon RF 14-35mm f4L is Lens - AU Version
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $7.95
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Delivery $9.90
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Free delivery between Tue – Sat
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Free delivery between 2–9 July
I was originally going to write a scathing review of this lens. As it turns out, the issue I was having wasn't with the lens at all, it was the software I was using (Lightroom Classic). I was experiencing terrible vignetteing and barrel distortion that was especially noticeable when shooting wide. Lightroom was reading the meta data correctly but was not applying the correct profile in the develop module. Now that I've discovered that, I am totally thrilled with this lens. It is every bit as good as my EF 16-35L that this replaced. Excellent for landscapes and works great for architectural applications as well. I just can't believe I was ready to sell this lens and go back to the EF 16-35L. This lens will be going with me everywhere.
Sharp and nice color just like any other L lenses. Focuses very close. It is not macro but good for flowers and any other larger objects.Uncorrected, there is significant vignetting. Once correction is applied, there is no problem. I do not mind the uncorrected image as I often like to crop to 16:9. The vignetting is off the image and I get a view wider than 14mm. It is ok for some of the shots I take.One negative is there is significant lens breathing.
Have had this lens for a little better than a week now. This lens represents another step in the process to convert all my EF glass to RF. I shot the EF16-35mm f2.8 v ll for several years. It was one of the lens that I used the most. So I think that I'm probably qualified to make a comparison. One of the reasons that I wanted to replace the EF version was that I felt that it wasn't as sharp as I would like. My regular work flow almost always involved sharpening. Now that I have shot with the RF f4 version for a couple of extended shoots, I think that I can provide a useful review. The size difference is nice, so is the weight and filter size. For sharpness, compared to the EF 16-35mm f2.8 vll. the RF f4 version is in my opinion sharper. No need to sharpen anything ... MoreHave had this lens for a little better than a week now. This lens represents another step in the process to convert all my EF glass to RF. I shot the EF16-35mm f2.8 v ll for several years. It was one of the lens that I used the most. So I think that I'm probably qualified to make a comparison. One of the reasons that I wanted to replace the EF version was that I felt that it wasn't as sharp as I would like. My regular work flow almost always involved sharpening. Now that I have shot with the RF f4 version for a couple of extended shoots, I think that I can provide a useful review. The size difference is nice, so is the weight and filter size. For sharpness, compared to the EF 16-35mm f2.8 vll. the RF f4 version is in my opinion sharper. No need to sharpen anything so far. However; the barrel distortion @ 14mm is heavier than I anticipated. Since Adobe hasn't got a profile for this lens yet. I had to make my own. Kind of a pain, but doable. Overall, I LOVE this lens. The difference between 16mm and 14mm is amazing. I certainly don't miss the added weight of the EF version either (even though not a great difference). Highly recommended. One star subtracted for the barrel distortation.
I have used the canon 17-40 mm zoom lens for years. Last year I bought the canon R5 and have been using the 17-40 with the adapter and it's been fine. Recently I decided to purchase a dedicated RF Lens.I read the reviews on this lens and they were mixed, but I have to say this is a fabulous Lens! I have no issues with this lens and I absolutely love it. I love the extra wide view that it gives just those three extra millimeters is amazing. I have no issues processing the images in Lightroom. For whatever reason the exact correct lens doesn't pop up in the correction box one of the lenses on that list works every time. I will also say when you shoot raw that it pops up in the dialogue box every time. If you shoot JPEG's for some reason it doesn't show up exactly ... MoreI have used the canon 17-40 mm zoom lens for years. Last year I bought the canon R5 and have been using the 17-40 with the adapter and it's been fine. Recently I decided to purchase a dedicated RF Lens.I read the reviews on this lens and they were mixed, but I have to say this is a fabulous Lens! I have no issues with this lens and I absolutely love it. I love the extra wide view that it gives just those three extra millimeters is amazing. I have no issues processing the images in Lightroom. For whatever reason the exact correct lens doesn't pop up in the correction box one of the lenses on that list works every time. I will also say when you shoot raw that it pops up in the dialogue box every time. If you shoot JPEG's for some reason it doesn't show up exactly correct, but it doesn't matter the 10-22 or 15 mm will work. And of course if needed you can always adjust manually. But about the lens I absolutely love it. I love that it's a little smaller and lighter and dedicated to my R5 and I'm not fooling around with the adapter ring. For me it is really the perfect lens for doing interior architectural shots.
Got this on the current sale for $400 off and I've used this on a couple of video shoots for walk and talk videos with associated b roll and I absolutely love it. It's a great focal range and covers about 95 percent of the shots that I want to get. I had a different lens that was 14-24 and hardly ever used it, because that focal range was too specialized. Another great feature is that the lens is very light weight, so on a gimbal it's easier on the battery life than the previous lens I was using (sigma 24-105, f4). I love the image quality, and the look of the lens the wider it gets. I don't mind that it's F4. I also plan on using it on the wide shot when I do live performances, and I'm sure it will come in just as handy giving me the flexibility I need to adjust to ... MoreGot this on the current sale for $400 off and I've used this on a couple of video shoots for walk and talk videos with associated b roll and I absolutely love it. It's a great focal range and covers about 95 percent of the shots that I want to get. I had a different lens that was 14-24 and hardly ever used it, because that focal range was too specialized. Another great feature is that the lens is very light weight, so on a gimbal it's easier on the battery life than the previous lens I was using (sigma 24-105, f4). I love the image quality, and the look of the lens the wider it gets. I don't mind that it's F4. I also plan on using it on the wide shot when I do live performances, and I'm sure it will come in just as handy giving me the flexibility I need to adjust to the different performance venues I record in, whether I'm using full frame or super 35 camera for the master shot.
In other reviews, I understand the dismay at the vignetting in the raw image, but since it disappears like magic when Lightroom uses the correction for this lens, let me start this review by saying: modern digital images are made to be corrected and I've had to get used to that, so that I have to with this lens doesn't bother me.Because this is a superb lens in every other respect-lightweight, especially compared to the beautiful RF 15-35 2.8 brick; it's small enough for easy portability, and reasonably priced. And the images are excellent-I can easily look past the easily correctable vignetting.Maybe my acceptance and appreciation comes from shooting long enough when the neighborhood camera store shooed people away from anything wider than 28mm due to ... MoreIn other reviews, I understand the dismay at the vignetting in the raw image, but since it disappears like magic when Lightroom uses the correction for this lens, let me start this review by saying: modern digital images are made to be corrected and I've had to get used to that, so that I have to with this lens doesn't bother me.Because this is a superb lens in every other respect-lightweight, especially compared to the beautiful RF 15-35 2.8 brick; it's small enough for easy portability, and reasonably priced. And the images are excellent-I can easily look past the easily correctable vignetting.Maybe my acceptance and appreciation comes from shooting long enough when the neighborhood camera store shooed people away from anything wider than 28mm due to distortion.Early attempts to get below 20mm and not have an increasingly fisheyed image were big, cumbersome, expensive lenses, and for all that, marginally effective. And correcting for the distortion in the darkroom usually meant cropping to the center, effectively eliminating the wide view we really wanted. Those days are long gone, but the memories still guide me now.Now, for example, the RF 14-35 has little distortion on the edges at 14mm, and the need for correction in Lightroom is very minimal as well.Canon continued the somewhat weird zoom mechanism I have with their RF 15-35 2.8, where 14mm is actually to the left of "center", and neutral is at 20mm. It's more curious than annoying, but worth mentioning.One of my reasons for switching to mirrorless was to get back to the smaller-even if not really lighter-camera bodies I carried for years when shooting film. The R5 finally enticed me to make the plunge, and the RF lenses are uniformly above the EF lenses they replace. Even the non-L RFs I own are excellent lenses, and are far lighter than their L counterpart.I sold my RF 15-35 to buy the 14-35 just for the weight, size and cost savings over the 2.8. The weight of digital is hard to avoid, but I'm succeeding with the smaller L and non-L lenses, and I don't seem to be giving up any quality in the image. By these criteria, Canon seems to be doing a pretty amazing job at design and execution.
I bought this to replace my EF 16-35 f/4L, as I'm now using an EOS R5. Having read several excellent reviews and trying a friend's 14-35, I had an idea of what to expect, and the reality matches.The good: Excellent range of angle-of-view, light, compact, and good-to-excellent image quality at all FLs.The not-so-good: As reviewers said, the lens vignettes at the short end and is my softest L-lens at the long end. The images look fine until they're viewed at half-size or larger magnification. It's unfortunate that Canon's design decisions/tradeoffs resulted in these shortcomings. Also, interestingly, the FoV at 14mm is noticeably narrower than with my EF 14 f/2.8 L (II). I think this is mostly the result of default lens correction (cropping) done by processing ... MoreI bought this to replace my EF 16-35 f/4L, as I'm now using an EOS R5. Having read several excellent reviews and trying a friend's 14-35, I had an idea of what to expect, and the reality matches.The good: Excellent range of angle-of-view, light, compact, and good-to-excellent image quality at all FLs.The not-so-good: As reviewers said, the lens vignettes at the short end and is my softest L-lens at the long end. The images look fine until they're viewed at half-size or larger magnification. It's unfortunate that Canon's design decisions/tradeoffs resulted in these shortcomings. Also, interestingly, the FoV at 14mm is noticeably narrower than with my EF 14 f/2.8 L (II). I think this is mostly the result of default lens correction (cropping) done by processing apps like Lightroom and Capture One, but of course I can't be sure.The redeeming: Imaging shortcomings can generally be overcome in post with a bit of effort.Bottom line: I don't know of a lens that can do what this lens does, and it's a good complement to the RF 24-105L; just be prepared to do a bit of extra processing to pull L quality from this lens.
If your looking for very high quality ultra wide angle lens for RF system, then this is your lens. Very sharp with only bit softening in the corners, only noticeable when pixel peeping on computer. No lens is perfect from center to corner. I sold my RF 15-35mm f/2.8 for this lens with no regrets. It does suffer from vignetting in corners as most reviews have pointed out, not unusual for WA lens like this. Lightroom now has the lens profile for it to correct that. But I personally use the lens profile for the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1, it does great job of removing the vignetting and distortion but crops out very little of the over all image. The lens profile for this lens, does good job but it crops the image more than I would like. Small light and takes 77mm filters is ... MoreIf your looking for very high quality ultra wide angle lens for RF system, then this is your lens. Very sharp with only bit softening in the corners, only noticeable when pixel peeping on computer. No lens is perfect from center to corner. I sold my RF 15-35mm f/2.8 for this lens with no regrets. It does suffer from vignetting in corners as most reviews have pointed out, not unusual for WA lens like this. Lightroom now has the lens profile for it to correct that. But I personally use the lens profile for the RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1, it does great job of removing the vignetting and distortion but crops out very little of the over all image. The lens profile for this lens, does good job but it crops the image more than I would like. Small light and takes 77mm filters is also big plus. LOVE IT!
With the new Lightroom lens profile out, the wide end of this lens cleans up really well. If you didn't know such extreme corrections were being made, you may not suspect it. (Go into Lightroom and toggle on/off the profile correction). The corrections do trim the edges a bit, and I'm not sure if it's still a true 14mm after corrections, or maybe it was even wider before so that the adjusted image lands around 14mm. Regardless, I really have no complaints with most of the zoom range. But where this lens falls down is at 35mm. It is super soft, and features chromatic aberation at 35mm. This is a super important end of the zoom range for this lens, as it is where you can achieve a normal focal length for an environmental portrait. But it just doesn't deliver at 35. ... MoreWith the new Lightroom lens profile out, the wide end of this lens cleans up really well. If you didn't know such extreme corrections were being made, you may not suspect it. (Go into Lightroom and toggle on/off the profile correction). The corrections do trim the edges a bit, and I'm not sure if it's still a true 14mm after corrections, or maybe it was even wider before so that the adjusted image lands around 14mm. Regardless, I really have no complaints with most of the zoom range. But where this lens falls down is at 35mm. It is super soft, and features chromatic aberation at 35mm. This is a super important end of the zoom range for this lens, as it is where you can achieve a normal focal length for an environmental portrait. But it just doesn't deliver at 35. Also, the lens features a 0.38x magnification at 35mm, which I found unusable because of softness. This was one aspect of this lens I planned to use a lot, as 0.38 would make it the closest focusing lens in my collection.It was hard to return this lens because this does fit a niche for which there is literally no alternative. That niche being a light, compact UWA RF mount zoom. I wanted it to work. I will probably end up with the 15-35 2.8, which I was hoping to avoid due to weight and size. But bottom line is at this price I found the flaws just not worth it. If it ever fell to about $1100, where it's predecessor was priced I might consider it in the future.
I originally rented this lens for a project and then immediately turned around and bought it. For the size, weight, aperture, and performance of this lens it is a real gem. The maximum aperture of F/4 does not bother me for a wide angle lens and I would happily trade one stop of light for the small size and weight advantage. Standard screw on filters will work however I noticed a very slight vignette. A slim screw on filter might not vignette at all. I was using NiSi TrueColor ND with a filter ring adapter.It does rely heavily on software lens correction but it was never a problem for any photo or video I used it for.
| Lens system | |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.2 m |
| Maximum aperture number | 22 |
| Lens mount interface | Canon RF |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
