Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC Usd G2 Lens (Canon)
The Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 is a telephoto lens with zoom for full-frame cameras that allows you to capture nature, portrait, landscape, and sports photos. The lens has 23 elements divided over 17 groups. The 1XLD and 5LD element prevent optical errors. The lens also has eBAND and BBAR coatings to prevent lens errors and ghosting. It also has a fast autofocus. Thanks to this, you can capture moving objects accurately. The built-in image stabilization compensates up to 5 stops. The fixed aperture of f/2.8 over the entire zoom range allows you to take clear photos in poor-light situations. You can focus from 95cm.
The Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 is a telephoto lens with zoom for full-frame cameras that allows you to capture nature, portrait, landscape, and sports photos. The lens has 23 elements divided over 17 groups. The 1XLD and 5LD element prevent optical errors. The lens also has eBAND and BBAR coatings to prevent lens errors and ghosting. It also has a fast autofocus. Thanks to this, you can capture moving objects accurately. The built-in image stabilization compensates up to 5 stops. The fixed aperture of f/2.8 over the entire zoom range allows you to take clear photos in poor-light situations. You can focus from 95cm.
The Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 is a telephoto lens with zoom for full-frame cameras that allows you to capture nature, portrait, landscape, and sports photos. The lens has 23 elements divided over 17 groups. The 1XLD and 5LD element prevent optical errors. The lens also has eBAND and BBAR coatings to prevent lens errors and ghosting. It also has a fast autofocus. Thanks to this, you can capture moving objects accurately. The built-in image stabilization compensates up to 5 stops. The fixed aperture of f/2.8 over the entire zoom range allows you to take clear photos in poor-light situations. You can focus from 95cm.
The Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 is a telephoto lens with zoom for full-frame cameras that allows you to capture nature, portrait, landscape, and sports photos. The lens has 23 elements divided over 17 groups. The 1XLD and 5LD element prevent optical errors. The lens also has eBAND and BBAR coatings to prevent lens errors and ghosting. It also has a fast autofocus. Thanks to this, you can capture moving objects accurately. The built-in image stabilization compensates up to 5 stops. The fixed aperture of f/2.8 over the entire zoom range allows you to take clear photos in poor-light situations. You can focus from 95cm.
in 8 offers
The lowest price for Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC Usd G2 Lens (Canon) right now is $1,199.95 at Ted's Cameras, compared across 6 retailers.
The all-time low was $389.97 on 8 June 2026 ā today's price is 208% above the lowest ever. It has been notably cheaper before ā worth setting a price alert.
Prices last updated 28 July 2026.
Last updated at 28/07/2026 16:38:19
Tamron SP AF 70-200MM F2.8 VC USD G2 - Canon EF | Secondhand
Delivery $9.95
[top Mint] Tamron Sp 70-200mm F/2.8 Di Vc Usd G2 For Canon Ef Mount
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Tamron SP A025 70-200mm F/2.8 VC Di USD Lens For Canon (G2)
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
TAMRON Camera Lens SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Black A025 [Canon EF / zoom lens]
Delivery $50.41
Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 - Canon
Free delivery
Tamron - SP 70-200 mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 - Lens for Canon Cameras - Black - A025E
Delivery between 2ā6 Aug $35.88
Tamron A025C SP 70-200mm F2.8 Di VC USD G2 for Canon Digital SLR Camera
Delivery between 2ā6 Aug $35.88
Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2
originally posted on lensrentals.com
I rented this lens to try out to see if I liked it enough to buy and save money rather than buying the Nikon version. I had the opportunity to photograph a theater performance with it. Using a Nikon D850, I found the autofocus to be incredibly inconsistent using only the F2.8 aperture. Many of the shots I took came out just slightly out of focus. When they did show in focus, they were tack sharp and looked as I hoped they would. I've shot theater for 10 years and never had a lens this inconsistent. By contrast I shot the same performance the next day with my Nikon 70-200 F4 and had great results as I usually do.Maybe the Tamron would do better on a D5 or sports body, or maybe it's just not great in inconsistent lighting, or maybe I'm not the photographer I think I ...Ā MoreI rented this lens to try out to see if I liked it enough to buy and save money rather than buying the Nikon version. I had the opportunity to photograph a theater performance with it. Using a Nikon D850, I found the autofocus to be incredibly inconsistent using only the F2.8 aperture. Many of the shots I took came out just slightly out of focus. When they did show in focus, they were tack sharp and looked as I hoped they would. I've shot theater for 10 years and never had a lens this inconsistent. By contrast I shot the same performance the next day with my Nikon 70-200 F4 and had great results as I usually do.Maybe the Tamron would do better on a D5 or sports body, or maybe it's just not great in inconsistent lighting, or maybe I'm not the photographer I think I am! Either way, I'm glad I rented before buying.Thanks to Liz who was very helpful during the rental process. Great customer service.
originally posted on adorama.com
Excellent image quality and good autofocus on my Canon 5D Mark III. It's very sharp, I really love this lens. I updated from the old Tamron 70-200. Just 2 things that bug me -1. The switches are really easy to accidentally hit and move, especially if you carry it on a crossbody strap or holdfast harness like I do. It bumps up against my leg and moves the switches. A few times I've missed a shot at a wedding because it had switched to manual focus accidentally. If I carry it on the left side of my body it reduces the accidental hits, but still happens sometimes. I "fixed" this by putting some velcro straps around the lens over the switches so they can't move (you can also use gaffer's tape).2. This is a personal preference, but I liked how the zoom ring on the old ...Ā MoreExcellent image quality and good autofocus on my Canon 5D Mark III. It's very sharp, I really love this lens. I updated from the old Tamron 70-200. Just 2 things that bug me -1. The switches are really easy to accidentally hit and move, especially if you carry it on a crossbody strap or holdfast harness like I do. It bumps up against my leg and moves the switches. A few times I've missed a shot at a wedding because it had switched to manual focus accidentally. If I carry it on the left side of my body it reduces the accidental hits, but still happens sometimes. I "fixed" this by putting some velcro straps around the lens over the switches so they can't move (you can also use gaffer's tape).2. This is a personal preference, but I liked how the zoom ring on the old model was near the back of the lens (closer to the camera). This model it's near the front of the lens (reversing the place of the focus ring and zoom ring). It's a bit awkward for my hands to reach to the front of the lens to zoom. It's taken quite a while to get used to.
originally posted on bestbuy.com
This lens is fantastic. Itās sharp from 70mm all the way to 200mm wide open. Itās a great low light lens. VR is amazing. The build quality is top notch. It doesnāt lengthen to expand to 200mm. It does that internally. The weather sealing is also great. I am in love with this lens. This is the only zoom lens I would ever consider to use for portraits. Just a fantastic lens all around**the best thing about this lens is the Vibration Reduction or VC as they call it. Itās 2nd to none. Better than lenses twice the price. The stills VR setting is such a fantastic feature. It will allow you to hand hold shots at very low shutter speeds. You can shoot 200mm at 1/30 SS or even lower.
| Earn | 3x points |
| Focal Length | 70 to 200mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF |
Tamron SP AF 70-200MM F2.8 VC USD G2 - Canon EF | Secondhand
Delivery $9.95
[top Mint] Tamron Sp 70-200mm F/2.8 Di Vc Usd G2 For Canon Ef Mount
Free delivery
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
Tamron SP A025 70-200mm F/2.8 VC Di USD Lens For Canon (G2)
Affiliate Disclosure: We may receive a small commission for purchases made through this link at no extra cost to you. This helps support our site. Thank you!
TAMRON Camera Lens SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Black A025 [Canon EF / zoom lens]
Delivery $50.41
Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 - Canon
Free delivery
I rented this lens to try out to see if I liked it enough to buy and save money rather than buying the Nikon version. I had the opportunity to photograph a theater performance with it. Using a Nikon D850, I found the autofocus to be incredibly inconsistent using only the F2.8 aperture. Many of the shots I took came out just slightly out of focus. When they did show in focus, they were tack sharp and looked as I hoped they would. I've shot theater for 10 years and never had a lens this inconsistent. By contrast I shot the same performance the next day with my Nikon 70-200 F4 and had great results as I usually do.Maybe the Tamron would do better on a D5 or sports body, or maybe it's just not great in inconsistent lighting, or maybe I'm not the photographer I think I ...Ā MoreI rented this lens to try out to see if I liked it enough to buy and save money rather than buying the Nikon version. I had the opportunity to photograph a theater performance with it. Using a Nikon D850, I found the autofocus to be incredibly inconsistent using only the F2.8 aperture. Many of the shots I took came out just slightly out of focus. When they did show in focus, they were tack sharp and looked as I hoped they would. I've shot theater for 10 years and never had a lens this inconsistent. By contrast I shot the same performance the next day with my Nikon 70-200 F4 and had great results as I usually do.Maybe the Tamron would do better on a D5 or sports body, or maybe it's just not great in inconsistent lighting, or maybe I'm not the photographer I think I am! Either way, I'm glad I rented before buying.Thanks to Liz who was very helpful during the rental process. Great customer service.
Excellent image quality and good autofocus on my Canon 5D Mark III. It's very sharp, I really love this lens. I updated from the old Tamron 70-200. Just 2 things that bug me -1. The switches are really easy to accidentally hit and move, especially if you carry it on a crossbody strap or holdfast harness like I do. It bumps up against my leg and moves the switches. A few times I've missed a shot at a wedding because it had switched to manual focus accidentally. If I carry it on the left side of my body it reduces the accidental hits, but still happens sometimes. I "fixed" this by putting some velcro straps around the lens over the switches so they can't move (you can also use gaffer's tape).2. This is a personal preference, but I liked how the zoom ring on the old ...Ā MoreExcellent image quality and good autofocus on my Canon 5D Mark III. It's very sharp, I really love this lens. I updated from the old Tamron 70-200. Just 2 things that bug me -1. The switches are really easy to accidentally hit and move, especially if you carry it on a crossbody strap or holdfast harness like I do. It bumps up against my leg and moves the switches. A few times I've missed a shot at a wedding because it had switched to manual focus accidentally. If I carry it on the left side of my body it reduces the accidental hits, but still happens sometimes. I "fixed" this by putting some velcro straps around the lens over the switches so they can't move (you can also use gaffer's tape).2. This is a personal preference, but I liked how the zoom ring on the old model was near the back of the lens (closer to the camera). This model it's near the front of the lens (reversing the place of the focus ring and zoom ring). It's a bit awkward for my hands to reach to the front of the lens to zoom. It's taken quite a while to get used to.
This lens is fantastic. Itās sharp from 70mm all the way to 200mm wide open. Itās a great low light lens. VR is amazing. The build quality is top notch. It doesnāt lengthen to expand to 200mm. It does that internally. The weather sealing is also great. I am in love with this lens. This is the only zoom lens I would ever consider to use for portraits. Just a fantastic lens all around**the best thing about this lens is the Vibration Reduction or VC as they call it. Itās 2nd to none. Better than lenses twice the price. The stills VR setting is such a fantastic feature. It will allow you to hand hold shots at very low shutter speeds. You can shoot 200mm at 1/30 SS or even lower.
I do a lot of photography in performance venues and can't use flash so a fast lens is very important. I lusted after the comparable Canon offerings but this lens had great reviews and was considerably less expensive; then B&H dropped the price a hundred bucks and I couldn't say no!So far I'm very pleased with this lens. It's heavy, but that's the nature of constant aperture engineering. You'll want a tripod or monopod for long shoots.I would give this five stars except for the sun shade. It feels like Tamron cut corners here. The attachment feels much less sturdy than the shade on its sister 24-70 G2 and I was disappointed when I went to put the shade on the lens.
The only way this business could be better is if they donated everything they made to charity.This is my second rental with Lens Rentals. I tried a Tamron 70-200 f2.8 first, and enjoyed it. This Canon has better AF, Detail. The colors are the biggest difference, they were true and noticeably better than the Tamron.The customer service is top notch, the products are well taken care of, and the entire process is incredibly easy. Receive your box with your product in a pelican case, use the same box to ship it back, put the included return label over the original shipping label, and tape it back up to drop it off. They even include the shipping tape for the return box.
For all Nikon users it was shame to use 3rd party lens if there is native.. lets be honest..But this one outperformed nikons 70-200 EI am pretty amazed with photo quality, solid built and everything elseIn phitography already 15years and yes first time bought 3rd party Tamron for D610 and z6 ii , this little joy is incredibleExcellent quality of images fast quiet autofocus and VC is simmilar to VR in NikonAt its price 1000$ cheaper then Nikons this marvel is the best dear(Just lens leg is not as comfy to grab as nikons,the rest buttery smooth)With love from Armenia))
TL;DR: I settled on this lens because you get a fantastic IQ for the price. I would recommend it to others.Some background. My friend let me borrow the Nikon 70-200 f/4 for testing purposes. I was very impressed by the lightning-fast focus, sharpness, lightweight body, and OS. That was an excellent lens! However, I also enjoy taking portraits and low light nature pictures and craving more light and shallower DOF.My experience with the Tamron is from a Nikon d780 shooting hummingbirds, portraits, and a few landscapes during hikes in dry climates/cities. For these purposes, I have no complaints and would easily compare it to the Nikon 70-200 f4. The focus is fast/accurate, and the main reason for blurry shots is that I lose track of small subjects or some other ...Ā MoreTL;DR: I settled on this lens because you get a fantastic IQ for the price. I would recommend it to others.Some background. My friend let me borrow the Nikon 70-200 f/4 for testing purposes. I was very impressed by the lightning-fast focus, sharpness, lightweight body, and OS. That was an excellent lens! However, I also enjoy taking portraits and low light nature pictures and craving more light and shallower DOF.My experience with the Tamron is from a Nikon d780 shooting hummingbirds, portraits, and a few landscapes during hikes in dry climates/cities. For these purposes, I have no complaints and would easily compare it to the Nikon 70-200 f4. The focus is fast/accurate, and the main reason for blurry shots is that I lose track of small subjects or some other user error. Note that my copy came with a free Tap-in console, so it would have been easy to correct any focusing issues from the factory.The biggest drawback of this lens is that it is somewhat heavy (~1.5kg) to carry around your neck. The weight comes mostly from of the wide aperture in this zoom range and solid construction. I rarely use a tripod/monopod because I'm always moving around and was worried that the weight would be an issue. However, after using this lens as a walking-around lens, I was happy to find that this is not a big issue. Note that all f/2.8 lenses in this focus range have a similar weight. Thus, if this is an essential factor, you might want to consider an f/4 lens (~0.9kg) or smaller.Enjoy.
Lens arrived 2 (free!) days early in near new condition. Popped it on my Z7 and went out to play! At first focus was soft, I recalibrated for mild front focus and got shots sharper than my Nikon z series 24-70 s f4! Big shocker was the vibration control. Shooting at 1/20th with 70 year old hands and getting shots very sharp indeed! I surprised myself and bought the thingā¦.Before retirement I used to help Retail and Service companies improve their customer experience functions. Lens Rental could serve as an example of excellence in this area.
Im sure I got a bad lens (four, actually!), because thereās no way the Tamron flagship lens duo (the 24-70mm and 70-200mm G2) were meant to perform this way, but alas ā and Iām not the only person whoās suffered the wrath of poor quality controlā¦The 70-200mm G2 (and itās little brother, the 24-70mm G2) have the potential of being great lenses, and apparently there are a lot of āgoodā ones out there. The ones Iāve owned (and no longer do) were āwell builtā (in appearance), and āseemedā to focus fast. But the autofocus consistency was so poor on all the units that I owned that I simply could not trust the glass. These lenses have the potential of being very sharp as well, but that is the direct by-product of hitting accurate focus ā or being able to calibrate the ...Ā MoreIm sure I got a bad lens (four, actually!), because thereās no way the Tamron flagship lens duo (the 24-70mm and 70-200mm G2) were meant to perform this way, but alas ā and Iām not the only person whoās suffered the wrath of poor quality controlā¦The 70-200mm G2 (and itās little brother, the 24-70mm G2) have the potential of being great lenses, and apparently there are a lot of āgoodā ones out there. The ones Iāve owned (and no longer do) were āwell builtā (in appearance), and āseemedā to focus fast. But the autofocus consistency was so poor on all the units that I owned that I simply could not trust the glass. These lenses have the potential of being very sharp as well, but that is the direct by-product of hitting accurate focus ā or being able to calibrate the lenses consistently, which I could not do. Each time I thought I had the lenses dialed in, Iād take them in the field and get tons of throw-aways. I was to the point that I was switching to ālesserā lenses to get the shots ā like Tamronās own 17-35mm which is a sweet lens, or their 100-400mm which was more consistent at 100-200 than the 70-200mm G2 (shame, shame, lol) ā and while typically not as sharp as the G2 lenses, when you have accurate autofocus in these other lenses, you end up keeping more shots!The first copy I got was horribly with auto-focus, sometimes slow, sometimes fastā¦and no matter of Tap-in calibration was able to create consistent performance. I also had to combine a ton of AF Fine Tune in addition to Tap-in calibration, which is simply unacceptable - That unit was sent back for exchange, only for me to get one that back-focused pretty bad. But I was able to calibrate it quite well with my SpyderLensCal as well as with Focal software. But, like the 24-70mm G2, the calibrations I did didnāt hold in the field, as I just started getting really bad shots. Each time I re-calibrated, the lens took a different calibration. Again, tested it out in the field, and poor results.So I did some tests and concluded that this lens (as well as the 24-70mm) had issues when the focus distance changed substantially ā if I took at shot, then defocused to the rear or to the front heavily, I couldnāt get focus back on the original subject; it was either front of rear focused. If I made small changes in defocus, the lenses were fine. The lens was really bad at the long end (200mm).As well, something I noticed immediately was that both of these lenses (24-70 and 70-200) actually LOST significant sharpness as you stopped down! What?! The lens sharpness was best at wide open, and dropped off between f/4 and f/11 (with f/6.3 and f/8 being the worst! Stay what??), and then actually got better up to f/16. What a really weird sharpness curveā¦Then JUST recently Tamron released firmware updates which 1) changed the calibration numbers again (I reloaded my previous calibrations and they arenāt even close now), and 2) the lens seemed to actually perform worse.I spent more time trying to calibrate these lenses than I did in post processing, and thatās a problem.I hope you get a good copy if you purchase ā I didnāt (twice). And I no longer own either of them.
While I have not had this lens very long, I am very happy with the results so far. I enjoy taking sports photos (college baseball, currently), and those have turned out exceptionally well. (I use this lens with my Canon EOS 80D digital camera.) I wanted to test the lens under the artificial lighting of a night game, but I didn't get the chance before the team I photograph played its final home game. That is the only reason I've given this lens 4 stars instead of 5 - the lack of opportunity to test it under low-light conditions. I also do some scenic/landscape and wildlife photography, but again, I haven't had the opportunity to use the lens in those situations yet. However, based on its performance at the baseball games, there's no reason for me to think it wouldn't ...Ā MoreWhile I have not had this lens very long, I am very happy with the results so far. I enjoy taking sports photos (college baseball, currently), and those have turned out exceptionally well. (I use this lens with my Canon EOS 80D digital camera.) I wanted to test the lens under the artificial lighting of a night game, but I didn't get the chance before the team I photograph played its final home game. That is the only reason I've given this lens 4 stars instead of 5 - the lack of opportunity to test it under low-light conditions. I also do some scenic/landscape and wildlife photography, but again, I haven't had the opportunity to use the lens in those situations yet. However, based on its performance at the baseball games, there's no reason for me to think it wouldn't result in excellent photos for those types of photos as well. The big test will come when I have the chance to photograph events "under the lights." But so far: I love this lens.
| Earn | 3x points |
| Focal Length | 70 to 200mm |
| Maximum Aperture | f/2.8 |
| Minimum Aperture | f/22 |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF |
